Analytic Ordering for Theoretical Purposes

Abstract

This article discusses why and how to make explicit the linkages between interaction and conditions affecting both the interaction and its consequences. The discussion aims at (a) extending the range of conditions/conseguences considered by researchers; (b) forcing self-consciousness in their analytic choices among these; (c) helping to trace the often-intricate connections among them, thus (d) facilitating their ordering into explanatory hypotheses and their testing; (e) ensuring, or raising the probability, that explanations encompass variation; and (f) ultimately enabling presentation of a more orderly, com plete, and persuasive explanatory account. To this end, an updated version of our conditional matrix and what are now termed connectivity paths are outlined and illustrated.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interaction Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Corbin, J. , & Strauss, A. (1990). Basics of qualitative research Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Dewey, J. (1922). Human nature and conduct New York: Holt.

Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

Glaser, B. , & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory Chicago: Aldine.

Maines, D. (1991). Forward. In A. Strauss, Continual permutations of action (pp. xii-xv). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.

Mead, G. (1934). Mind, self and society Chicago : University of Chicago Press.

Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists New York: Cambridge University Press.

Strauss, A. (1991). Creating sociological awareness New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

10.

Strauss, A. (1993). Continual permutations of action. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.

11.

Strauss, A. (1995). Notes on the nature and development of general theories. Qualitative Inquiry, 1, 7-18.