The article proposes that there cannot be truly emancipatory participatory research or participatory research advocates without explicit incorporation of feminist perspectives. As part of the larger dialogue regarding taking sides through research, the author asks us to consider a more feminist participatory research. The basis of her argument relates to issues of ontological congruency. After defining feminism(s), the article briefly identifies the androcentric and incongruous aspects of participatory research. It con cludes with specific areas for discussion if we are to consider more feminist participatory research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Becker, H. (1970). Whose side are we on? In W. J. Filstead (Ed.), Qualitative methodology. Chicago: Markam.
2.
Duelli Klein, R. (1983). How to do what we want to do: Thought about feminist methodology. In G. Bowles & R. Duelli Klein (Eds.), Theories of women's studies. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
3.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Seabury.
4.
Hall, B. (1993). Introduction. In P. Park, M. Brydon-Miller, B. Hall, & T. Jackson (Eds.), Voices of change: Participatory research in the United States and Canada. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
5.
Hall, B. (1981). Participatory research, popular knowledge, and power: A personal reflection. Convergence, pp. 24-32.
6.
Harding, S. (1986). The science question in feminism. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
7.
Hartsock, N. (1974). Political change: Two perspectives on power. Quest: A Feminist Quarterly, 1(1. (Reprinted in C. Bunch [Ed.], Building feminist theory: Essays from Quest . New York: Longman, 1981)
8.
Hurtado, A. (1989). Relating to privilege: Seduction and rejection in the subordination of White women and women of color. Signs, 14, 833-855.
9.
Johnson-Odim, C. (1991). Common themes, different contexts: Third World women and feminism. In C Mohanty, A. Russo, & L. Torres (Eds.), Third World women and the politics of feminism . Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
10.
Joseph, G., & Lewis, J. (1981). Common differences: Conflicts in Black and White feminist perspectives. New York: Doubleday.
11.
Khanna, R. (1994). Participatory action research (PAR) in women's health. In K. de Koning (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Participatory Research in Health Promotion (pp. 25-32). Liverpool, UK: Education Resource Group, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine.
12.
Kindervatter, S. (1979). Nonformal education as an empowering process. Amherst: Center for International Education, University of Massachusetts.
13.
Lather, R. (1991). Gettmg smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge .
14.
Maguire, P. (1987). Doing participatory research: Afeminist approach . Amherst: Center for International Education, University of Massachusetts.
15.
Maguire, P. (1994). Participatory research from one feminist's perspective: Moving from exposing androcentricism to embracing possible contributions of feminisms to participatory research and practice. In K. de Koning (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Participatory Research in Health Promotion (pp. 5-14). Liverpool , UK: Education Resource Group, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine.
16.
Meulenberg-Buskens, I. (1994). The participatory researcher as education in research: Some notes. In K. de Koning (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Participatory Research in Health Promotion (pp. 42-45). Liverpool, UK: Education Resource Group, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine.
17.
Mills, C.W. (1961). The sociological imagination. New York: Grove.
18.
Mohanty, C.T. (1991a). Introduction: Cartographies of struggle—Third World women and the politics of feminism. In C. T. Mohanty, A. Russo, & L. Torres (Eds.), Third World women and the politics of feminism (pp. 1-47). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
19.
Mohanty, C.T. (1991b). Under Western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. In C. T. Mohanty, A. Russo, & L. Torres (Eds.), Third World women and the politics of feminism (pp. 51-80). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
20.
Mohanty, C. T., Russo, A. , & Torres, L. (Eds.). ( 1991). Preface. In C. T. Mohanty , A. Russo, & L. Torres (Eds.), Third World women and the politics of feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
21.
Park, P. (1993). What is participatory research? A theoretical and methodological perspective. In P. Park , M. Brydon-Miller, B. Hall, & T. Jackson (Eds.), Voices of change : Participatory research in the United States and Canada. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
22.
Reason, P. (1996). Reflections on the purposes of human inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 2, 15-29.
23.
Schechter, S. (1982). Women and male violence. Boston : South End.
24.
Smith, D. (1974). Women's perspective as a radical critique of sociology . Sociological Inquiry, 44, 7-13.
25.
Spender, D. (1983). Women of ideas (and what men have done to them . Boston: Ark Paperbacks.
26.
Stanley, L., & Wise, S. (1990). Feminist praxis and the academic mode in feminist research process. In L. Stanley (Ed.), Feminist praxis: Research, theory, and epistemology in feminist sociology (pp. 20-62). London: Routledge .
27.
Tandon, R. (1981). Participatory research in the empowerment of people . Convergence, 14(3), 20-27.
28.
Tandon, R. (1985, April 28). Participatory research and social action. Speech delivered at the Center for International Education, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
29.
Westkott, M. (1979). Feminist criticism of the social sciences. Harvard Educational Review, 49, 422-430.
