This article focuses on using readers theater for the purpose of qualitative data display. The article describes what readers theater is and differentiates this approach from more conventional forms of theater. The article also uses a recent attempt to present data in a readers theater context to ground discussions of (a) the procedures used to convert qualitative data into a readers theater display format and (b) the advantages and disadvantages of displaying data in the context of a readers theater production.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Berlin, I. (1966). The concept of scientific history. In W. Dray (Ed.), Philosophical analysis of history (pp. 5-55). New York: Harper & Row.
2.
Brecht, B. (1992). Brecht on theatre: The development of an aesthetic (J. Willett, Trans.). New York: Hill & Wing.
3.
Coger, L., & White, M. (1982). Reader's theater handbook: A dramatic approach to literature. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
4.
Cohen, R. (1994). Theatre. Mountainview, CA: Mayfield.
5.
Connelly, F.M., & Clandinin, D.J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(4), 2-14.
6.
Denzin, N. (1994, April). The experiential text and the limits of visual understanding. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
7.
Donmoyer, R. (1990). Generalizability and the single case study. In E. Eisner and A. Peshkin (Eds.), Qualitative research in education: The continuing debate (pp. 175-200). New York: Teachers College Press.
8.
Donmoyer, R. (1991). Postpositivist evaluation: Give me a for instance . Educational Administration Quarterly, 27(3), 265-296.
9.
Donmoyer, R. (1993). Art criticism as a guide to student evaluation . Theory into Practice, 32(4), 252-259.
10.
Donmoyer, R. (1995a, April). The very idea of a knowledge base. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
11.
Donmoyer, R. (1995b). A knowledge base for educational administration? Notes for the field. In R. Donmoyer, M. Imber, & J. Scheurich (Eds.), The knowledge base in educational administration: Multiple perspectives (pp. 74-95). Albany: State University of New York Press.
12.
Donmoyer, R. (in press). The concept of a knowledge base. In F. Murray (Ed.), A knowledge base for teacher education . New York: Jossey-Bass.
13.
Dray, W. (1957). Laws and explanation in history. London: Oxford University Press.
14.
Eisner, E. (1979). The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs. New York: Macmillan.
15.
Eisner, E. (1991). The enlightened eye. New York : Macmillan.
16.
Emig, J. (1971). The composing processes of twelfth graders. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English .
17.
Feldman, E. (1970). Becoming human through art. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
18.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures; selected essays . New York: Basic Books.
19.
Geertz, C. (1983). Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology. New York: Basic Books .
20.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
21.
Guare, J. (1990). Six degrees of separation. New York: Vintage.
22.
Gusfield, J. (1976). The literary rhetoric of science. American Sociologist, 41(1), 11-33.
23.
Jefferson, M. (1995, April 23). Perfectly tuned actors hit a high note . The New York Times, p. H-5.
24.
Jenkins, D., & O'Toole, B. (1978). Curriculum evaluation, literary criticism, and the paracurriculum. In G. Willis (Ed.), Qualitative evaluation: Concepts and cases in curriculum criticism (pp. 524-554). Berkeley, CA: McCuthan.
25.
Kleinau, M., & McHughes, J. (1980). Theaters for literature: A practical aesthetics for group interpretation. Sherman Oaks, CA: Alfred.
26.
Langer, S. (1957). Problems of art. New York: Scribner.
27.
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
28.
Marcus, G. (1993, April). The use and abuse of ethnography in contemporary efforts to remake the human sciences. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.
29.
Martin, R. (1993, April). Women, culture and pedagogy. A reflective readers theater performance. Script presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.
30.
Mink, L. (1987). Historical understanding. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
31.
Pickering, J. (1975). Readers theatre. Encino, CA : Dickenson.
32.
Richardson, L. (1993). Poetics, dramatics, and transgressive validity . The Sociological Quarterly, 34(4), 695-710.
33.
Slack, P. (1994, April). The vampire chronicle: A reader's theater on women in academia. Script presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
34.
Smith, F. (1982). Understanding reading. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
35.
Trousdale, A., Adams, N., Jacobs, M., Munro, P., & Quinn, M. (1994, April). Women talkin': A reader's theater performance of teachers stories. Script presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
36.
White, H. (1987). The content of form: Narrative discourse and historical representation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
37.
Wilder, T. (1957). Our Town, a play in three acts. New York: Harper & Row.
38.
Yennie-Donmoyer, J., & Donmoyer, R. (1991). Readers theater: Give us some for instances. Literacy Matters, 3(1), 4-9.
39.
Yennie-Donmoyer, J., & Donmoyer, R. (1993). Creating a culture of writers with at-risk students . In R. Donmoyer & R. Kos (Eds.), At-risk students: Portraits, policies, programs, and practices (pp. 343-368). Albany: State University of New York Press.
40.
Yennie-Donmoyer, J., & Donmoyer, R. (1994, April). In their own words: A readers theater presentation of middle school students writing about writing. Script presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
