Practicing Qualitative Research Under the “Big Tent”: Origins,Development,and Continuing Relevance of the Eight Big-Tent Framework for Qualitative Quality

Abstract

Developed from a keynote delivered at the 21st Annual International Congress of Qualitative Inquiry (ICQI) in 2025, this article explores the joys and challenges of practicing qualitative research within the “big-tent” framework—an inclusive and evolving space for diverse paradigms, methods, and voices. I reflect on the development and application of the Eight Big-Tent Framework, which I originally designed to help researchers craft rigorous, resonant, and impactful qualitative inquiry. The article discusses the distinction between end goals and the varied practices that support them, addresses common misreadings of the framework, and responds to critiques that have emerged over time. Emphasizing curiosity, collaboration, and accessibility, I advocate for a vision of qualitative research that values both philosophical diversity and methodological coherence. Ultimately, I offer guidance for dwelling well in the Big Tent—encouraging research that is reflexive, service-oriented, and committed to human flourishing.

Keywords

qualitative research quality criteria big tent research evaluation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

T. E.

Hermann

A. F.

(2023). Good autoethnography. Journal of Autoethnography, 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1525/joae.2023.4.1.1

Bhattacharya

(2018). Coloring memories and imaginations of “home”: Crafting a de/colonizing autoethnography. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 18(1), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708617734010

Bhattacharya

(2021). Rejecting labels and colonization: In exile from post-qualitative approaches. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(2), 179–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800420941049

Bloor

(2001). Techniques of validation in qualitative research: A critical commentary. In Emerson

R. M.

(Ed.), Contemporary field research (pp. 383–396). Waveland Press.

Bochner

(2000). Criteria against ourselves. Qualitative Inquiry, 6(2), 266–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780040000600209

Braun

Clarke

(2021). To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 13(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846

Braun

Clarke

(2025). Reporting guidelines for qualitative research: A values-based approach. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 22(2), 399–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2024.2382244

Burke

(2016). Rethinking ‘validity’ and ‘trustworthiness’ in qualitative inquiry: How might we judge the quality of qualitative research in sport and exercise sciences? In Smith

Sparkes

A. C.

(Eds.), Routledge handbook of qualitative research in sport and exercise, (pp. 330–339). Routledge.

Charmaz

(2017). Constructivist grounded theory. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 299–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262612

10.

Cheek

(2007). Qualitative inquiry, ethics and politics of evidence: Working within these spaces rather than being worked over by them. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(8), 1051–1059. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800407308227

11.

Corley

(2012). Publishing in AMJ—Part 7: What’s different about qualitative research? Academy of Management Journal, 55(3), 509–513. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.4003

12.

Crenshaw

(2013). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. In Maschke

(Ed.), Feminist legal theories (pp. 23–51). Routledge.

13.

Creswell

J. W.

Poth

C. N.

(2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.

14.

Gunasekaran

(2002). Cheese rheology and texture. CRC Press.

15.

Davis

M. S.

(1971). That’s interesting! Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1(2), 309–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/004839317100100211

16.

Deetz

S. A.

(1992). Democracy in an age of corporate colonization: Developments in communication and the politics of everyday life. State University of New York Press.

17.

Denzin

N. K.

(1978). Triangulation: A case for methodological evaluation and combination. In Sociological methods (pp. 339–357).

18.

Denzin

N. K.

(2008). The new paradigm dialogs and qualitative inquiry. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 21(4), 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390802136995

19.

Denzin

N. K.

(2017a). Critical qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(1), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780041668186

20.

Denzin

N. K.

(2017b). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Routledge.

21.

Denzin

N. K.

(2018). The qualitative manifesto: A call to arms. Routledge.

22.

Denzin

N. K.

Giardina

M. D.

(Eds.). (2024). Qualitative inquiry in transition—Pasts, presents, & futures: A critical reader. Taylor & Francis.

23.

Ellingson

L. L.

(2017). Embodiment in qualitative research. Routledge.

24.

Ellingson

L. L.

(2008). Engaging crystallization in qualitative research. Sage.

25.

Ellis

(2007). Telling secrets, revealing lives: Relational ethics in research with intimate others. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800406294947

26.

Faulkner

S. L.

(2016). Poetry as method: Reporting research through verse. Routledge.

27.

Fine

Tuck

Zeller-Berkman

(2008). Do you believe in Geneva? Methods and ethics at the global-local nexus. In N. Denzin, Y. Lincoln, & L. T. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of critical and Indigenous methodologies (pp. 157–177). Sage.

28.

Fletcher

(1966). Situation ethics: The new morality. Westminster John Knox Press.

29.

Flick

(Ed.). (2024). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research quality. Sage.

30.

Flyvbjerg

(2011). Case study. In Denzin

N. K.

Lincoln

Y. S.

(Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 301–316). Sage.

31.

Geertz

(1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. Basic Books.

32.

Gonzalez

M. C.

(2000). The four seasons of ethnography: A creation-centered ontology for ethnography. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 24(5), 623–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(00)00020-1

33.

Gordon

Patterson

J. A.

(2013). Response to Tracy’s under the “big tent”: Establishing universal criteria for evaluating qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 19(9), 689–695. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800413500934

34.

Harley

Cornelissen

(2022). Rigor with or without templates? The pursuit of methodological rigor in qualitative research. Organizational Research Methods, 25(2), 239–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120937786

35.

Koro-Ljungberg

MacLure

Ulmer

(2018). D...a...t...a..., data++, data, and some problematics. In Denzin

N. K.

Lincoln

Y. S.

(Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed., pp. 462–484). Sage.

36.

Lather

(1986). Issues of validity in openly ideological research: Between a rock and a soft place. Interchange, 17(1), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800406294947

37.

Lather

St. Pierre

E. A.

(2014). Post-qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 629–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788752

38.

Leach

R. B.

Zanin

A. C.

Tracy

S. J.

Adame

E. A.

(2023). Collective compassion: Responding to structural barriers to compassion with agentic action in healthcare organizations. Management Communication Quarterly, 38(3), 477–503. https://doi.org/10.1177/08933189231209724

39.

Leach

R. B.

Dehnert

Reutlinger

Marr

Tracy

S. J.

(2024). Setting up the tent poles: An overview, discussion, and extension of the big-tent model of qualitative quality. In Flick

(Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research quality (pp. 469–483). Sage.

40.

Levitt

H. M.

Motulsky

S. L.

Wertz

F. J.

Morrow

S. L.

Ponterotto

J. G.

(2017). Recommendations for designing and reviewing qualitative research in psychology: Promoting methodological integrity. Qualitative Psychology, 4(1), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000082

41.

Lewis

Ritchie

Ormston

Morrell

(2014). Generalising from qualitative research. In Ritchie

Lewis

McNaughton Nicholls

Ormston

(Eds.), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers (pp. 347–366). Sage.

42.

Lindlof

T. R.

(1995). Qualitative communication research methods. Sage.

43.

Lindlof

T. R.

Taylor

B. C.

(2017). Qualitative communication research methods. Sage.

44.

López

Tracy

S. J.

(2020). Anchoring the big tent: How organizational autoethnography exemplifies and stretches notions of qualitative quality. In Hermann

A. F.

(Ed.), The Routledge international handbook of organizational autoethnography (pp. 383–398). Routledge.

45.

Lutgen-Sandvik

Tracy

S. J.

Alberts

J. K.

(2007). Burned by bullying in the American workplace: Prevalence, perception, degree, and impact. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 837–862.

46.

Miles

M. B.

Huberman

A. M.

Saldaña

(2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage.

47.

Mitchell

C. F.

Ore

E. J.

Wutich

SturtzSreetharan

Brewis

Davis

O. I.

(2022). Sister-girl talk: A community-based method for group interviewing and analysis. Field Methods, 34(2), 181–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X221093824

48.

O’Connor

Joffe

(2020). Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220

49.

Owens

O. L.

Beer

J. M.

Revels

Levkoff

(2017). Feasibility of using a video diary methodology with older African Americans living alone. Qualitative Social Work, 18(3), 397–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325017729570

50.

Ravenek

M. J.

Rudman

D. L.

(2013). Bridging conceptions of quality in moments of qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 12(1), 436–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691301200122

51.

Richardson

St Pierre

E. A.

(2018). Writing: A method of inquiry. In Denzin

N. K.

Lincoln

Y. S.

(Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (5th ed., pp. 818–838). Sage.

52.

Ronai

C. R.

(1992). The reflexive self through narrative: A night in the life of an erotic dancer/researcher. In Ellis

Flaherty

M. G.

(Eds.), Investigating subjectivity: Research on lived experience (pp. 102–123). Sage.

53.

Saldaña

(2014). Blue-collar qualitative research: A rant. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(8), 976–980. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800413513739

54.

Scarduzio

J. A.

Geist-Martin

(2008). Making sense of fractured identities: Male professors’ narratives of sexual harassment. Communication Monographs, 75(4), 369–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750802512363

55.

Small

M. L.

Calarco

J. M.

(2022). Qualitative literacy: A guide to evaluating ethnographic and interview research. University of California Press.

56.

Smith

(2018). Generalizability in qualitative research: Misunderstandings, opportunities and recommendations for the sport and exercise sciences. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 10(1), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2017.1393221

57.

Smith

McGannon

K. R.

(2017). Developing rigor in qualitative research: Problems and opportunities within sport and exercise psychology. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2017.1317357

58.

Stake

R. E.

Trumbull

D. J.

(1982). Naturalistic generalizations. Review Journal of Philosophy and Social Science, 7(1&2), 1–12.

59.

St. Pierre

E. A

. (2021). Why post qualitative inquiry? Qualitative Inquiry, 27(2), 163–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800420931142

60.

St. Pierre

E. A

. (2014). A brief and personal history of post qualitative research: Toward “post inquiry.” Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 30(2), 2–19. https://journal.jctonline.org/index.php/jct/article/view/521

61.

Tracy

S. J.

(2000). Becoming a character for commerce: Emotion labor, self subordination and discursive construction of identity in a total institution. Management Communication Quarterly, 14(1), 90–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318900141004

62.

Tracy

S. J.

(2005). Locking up emotion: Moving beyond dissonance for understanding emotion labor discomfort. Communication Monographs, 72(3), 261–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750500206474

63.

Tracy

S. J.

(2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121

64.

Tracy

S. J.

(2012). The toxic and mythical combination of a deductive writing logic for inductive qualitative research. Qualitative Communication Research, 1(1), 109–141. https://doi.org/10.1525/qcr.2012.1.1.109

65.

Tracy

S. J.

(2018). A phronetic iterative approach to data analysis in qualitative research. Journal of Qualitative Research, 19(2), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.22284/qr.2018.19.2.61

66.

Tracy

S. J.

(2025). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact (3rd ed.). Wiley.

67.

Tracy

S. J.

Gist-Mackey

A. N.

Dehnert

(2024). Phronetic iterative qualitative data analysis (PIQDA) in organizational communication. In Brummans

B. H. J. M.

Taylor

B. C.

Sivunen

(Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in organizational communication (pp. 381–399). Sage.

68.

Tracy

S. J.

Lutgen-Sandvik

Alberts

J. K.

(2006). Nightmares, demons and slaves: Exploring the painful metaphors of workplace bullying. Management Communication Quarterly, 20(2), 148–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318906291980

69.

Tracy

S. J.

Reutlinger

(2020). How is qualitative data? An interrogation and puppet show dream. In Giardina

M. D.

Denzin

N. K.

(Eds.), Qualitative inquiry and the politics of resistance (pp. 55–73). Routledge.

70.

Tracy

S. J.

Rivera

K. D.

(2010). Endorsing equity and applauding stay-at-home moms: How male voices on work-life reveal aversive sexism and flickers of transformation. Management Communication Quarterly, 24(1), 3–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318909352248

71.

Tracy

S. J.

Tracy

(1998). Emotion labor at 911: A case study and theoretical critique. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 26(4), 390–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909889809365516

72.

Tsai

A. C.

Kohrt

B. A.

Matthews

L. T.

Betancourt

T. S.

Lee

J. K.

Papachristos

A. V.

Weiser

S. D.

Dworkin

S. L.

(2016). Promises and pitfalls of data sharing in qualitative research. Social Science & Medicine, 169, 191–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.08.004

73.

Tuval-Mashiach

(2017). Raising the curtain: The importance of transparency in qualitative research. Qualitative Psychology, 4(2), 126–138. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000062

74.

Vagle

M. D.

(2018). Crafting phenomenological research. Routledge.

75.

Way

Tracy

S. J.

(2012). Conceptualizing compassion as recognizing, relating and (re)acting: An ethnographic study of compassionate communication at hospice. Communication Monographs, 79(3), 292–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2012.697630

76.

Zanin

A. C.

(2018). Structuring bodywork: Control and agency in athlete injury discourse. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 46(3), 267–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2018.1465578

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.01 MB