I address some of the issues connected with the elusive concept of quality, especially in the process of qualitative inquiry. I do so by contrasting the relatively simple term “qualities” (or characteristics) with the more contentious idea of quality. I begin by considering aspects of psychogeography (assuming it to be one form of qualitative inquiry) and then by concentrating on the concept of quality itself in autoethnography, specifically as well as in higher education in general.
KnabbK. (Ed.). (1981). Situationist international anthology. Bureau of Public Secrets.
23.
MosesI. (1985). High quality teaching in a university: Identification and description. Studies in Higher Education, 10(3), 301–313.
24.
The Polytechnics & Colleges Funding Council. (1990, October). Teaching quality: Report of the committee of enquiry appointed by the council [The Warnock Report].
25.
RamsdenP. (1993). What is good teaching in higher education? In KnightP. T. (Ed.), The audit and assessment of teaching quality (pp. 43–52). Society for Research in Higher Education.
ShumarW. (1997). College for sale: A critique of the commodification of higher education. Falmer Press.
28.
SinclairI. (2002). London orbital. Granta.
29.
SpryT. (2011). Body, paper, stage: Writing and performing autoethnography. Left Coast Press.
30.
SpryT. (2017). Who are “we” in performative autoethnography?International Review of Qualitative Research, 10(1), 46–53.
31.
VesseyN. (2023, December11). Closing Google Maps opened up my world. The Guardian, p. 4.
32.
Watson-GegeoK. A. (1988). Ethnography in ESL: Defining the essential. TESOL Quarterly, 22, 575–592.
33.
WoolfV. (1925). The Common Reader (Vol. 1, McNeilliamA., Ed.). Vintage.
34.
WyattJ.GaleK. (2013). Getting out of ourselves: An assemblage autoethnography. In AdamsT.Holman-JonesS.EllisC. (Eds.), Handbook of autoethnography (pp. 300–312). Left Coast Press.
