Grading has long been the source of negative emotions in Writing Studies for teachers and students alike; these negative emotions and experiences especially affect women-identifying professors and professors of color. This poetic research study presents the found poems of writing instructors in one predominantly White Midwest US university English department; poems came from restories from participants’ interviews about how they developed as assessors of writing. The aim is to foreground lived experiences of college professors who teach undergraduate writing for a living as the field continues to explore ethical and humane ways of assessment for all involved.
BabbJ.CorbettS. J. (2016). From zero to sixty: A survey of college writing teachers’ grading practices and the affect of failed performance. Composition Forum, 34. http://compositionforum.com/issue/34/zero-sixty.php
2.
BarkhuizenG.BensonP.ChikA. (2014). Narrative inquiry in language teaching and learning research. Routledge.
3.
BasowS. A. (2000). Best and worst professors: Gender patterns in students’ choices. Sex Roles, 43(5), 407–417.
BloomL. Z. (1997). Why I (used to) hate to give grades. College Composition and Communication, 48(3), 360–371.
6.
Brunk-ChavezB.FredericksenE. (2008). Predicting success: Increasing retention and pass rates in college composition. Writing Program Administration, 32(1), 76–96.
7.
CarloneH. B.JohnsonA. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20237
8.
ClandininD. J.ConnellyF. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. Jossey-Bass.
9.
ConefreyT. (2018). Supporting first-generation students’ adjustment to college with high-impact practices. Journal of College Student Retention, 23(1), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025118807402
DanielewiczJ.ElbowP. (2009). A unilateral grading contract to improve learning and teaching. College Composition and Communication, 61(2), 244–268.
12.
DouglassB. G.MoustakasC. (1985). Heuristic inquiry: The internal search to know. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 25(3), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167885253004
13.
GarrettN.BridgewaterM.FeinsteinB. (2017). How student performance in first-year composition predicts retention and overall student success. In RueckerT.ShepherdD.EstremH.Brunk-ChavezB. (Eds.), Retention, persistence, and writing programs (pp. 93–113). University Press of Colorado.
14.
GubaE. G.LincolnY. S. (1981). Effective evaluation: Improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approaches. Jossey-Bass.
15.
GuskeyT. R. (1994). Making the grade: What benefits students?Educational Leadership, 52, 14–20.
16.
HanauerD. I. (2021). Poetic writing research: The history, methods and outcomes of poetic (auto) ethnography. In KuikenD.JacobsA. (Eds.), Handbook of empirical literary studies (pp. 421–448). John Benjamins.
17.
InmanJ. O.PowellR. A. (2018). In the absence of grades: Dissonance and desire in course-contract classrooms. College Composition and Communication, 70(1), 30–56.
18.
InoueA. B. (2014). Theorizing failure in US writing assessments. Research in the Teaching of English, 48(3), 330–352.
JoyeS.WilsonJ. H. (2015). Professor age and gender affect student perceptions and grades. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 15(4), 126–138.
21.
KirschenbaumH. (1973). Boxed in by grades. Teacher, 91(1), 46–48.
22.
LaCosseJ.SekaquaptewaD.BennettJ. (2016). STEM Stereotypic Attribution Bias among women in an unwelcoming science setting. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(3), 378–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684316630965
23.
MacNellL.DriscollA.HuntA. N. (2015). What’s in a name: Exposing gender bias in student ratings of teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 40(4), 291–303.
24.
McAdamsD. P. (2012). Exploring psychological themes through life-narrative accounts. In HolsteinJ. A.GubriumJ. F. (Eds.), Varieties of narrative analysis (pp. 15–32). SAGE.
25.
MoustakasC. (1990). Heuristic research: Design, methodology, and applications. SAGE.
26.
NicholesJ.ReimerC. (2020a). Evaluating the impact of first-year writing course grades on college-student persistence. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 64, 100841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100841
27.
NicholesJ.ReimerC. (2020b). The impact of taking basic writing on later writing course performance and graduation at a career-focused four-year university. Journal of Basic Writing, 39(1), 36–63.
28.
O’HaganL. K. (1997). It’s broken—Fix it! In TchudiS. (Ed.), Alternatives to grading student writing (pp. 3–14). National Council of Teachers of English.
