Deploying the Line to Study Young Adults’ Material-Discursive Identity Work and Its Slippery-Sticky Attachments to Developmentalism: A Diffractive Analysis
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online March, 2023
Deploying the Line to Study Young Adults’ Material-Discursive Identity Work and Its Slippery-Sticky Attachments to Developmentalism: A Diffractive Analysis
This article shares what surfaced during diffractive analysis of data from a participatory arts-engaged research project called Life Lines. Drawing on material feminism, studio-inquiry practices were designed to assist young adults in creatively speculating alongside researchers over varied conceptualizations of identity, including dominant explanations centering on cognitive development and alternative framings emphasizing materiality’s role in subjective formation. Lines as both culturally inscriptive “engines of theory” and as materially sensitive artistic inquiry practices were enlisted to open new insights about how it is for young adult bodies to sustain developmentalism’s “cruel optimism” about coherence, stability, and progression.
AbesE. S.JonesS. R.StewartD.-L. (2019). Rethinking college student development theory using critical frameworks. Stylus.
2.
AdamsK. L.SaundersK. E.Keown-StonemanC. D. G.DuffyA. C. (2021). Mental health trajectories in undergraduate students over the first year of university: A longitudinal cohort study. BMJ Open, 11(12), Article e047393. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047393
3.
AhmedS. K. (2010). Happy objects. In GreggM.SeigworthG. J. (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 29–51). Duke University Press.
4.
AhmedS. K. (2017). Living a feminist life. Duke University Press.
5.
AlcoffL. (1988). Cultural feminism versus post-structuralism: The identity crisis in feminist theory. Signs, 13(3), 405–436. https://doi.org/10.1086/494426
6.
AllenL.FenaughtyJ.CowieL. (2022). Thinking with new materialism about “safe-un-safe” campus space for LGBTTIQA+ students. Social & Cultural Geography, 23(5), 757–773.
7.
ArnettJ. J. (2015). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the early twenties (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
8.
AtkinsS.SnyderM. (2018). Nature-based expressive arts therapy: Integrating the expressive arts and ecotherapy. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
9.
BaradK. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
BeckerK. M.Clark/KeefeK.WhiteE. (2022). Creative space for navigating complex times: Using art-based inquiry to respond to uncertainty during COVID-19. Journal ofApplied Arts & Health, 13(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1386/jaah_00093_1
12.
BerlantL. (2011). Cruel optimism. Duke University Press.
13.
BhattacharyaK. (2021). Rejecting labels and colonization: In exile from post-qualitative approaches. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(2), 179–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800420941049
ButlerJ. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
18.
Clark/KeefeK. (2014a). Suspended animation: Attuning to material-discursive data and attending via art making during somatographic inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 790–800. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414530263
19.
Clark/KeefeK. (2014b). Becoming artist, becoming educated, becoming undone: Toward a nomadic perspective of college student identity development. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 7(1), 110–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2012.737048.
20.
Clark/KeefeK. (in press). Data’s entanglements: Artmaking as corresponding companion during diffractive analysis. Artizein: Arts and Teaching Journal.
Combahee River Collective. (1995). A Black feminist statement. In Guy-SheftallB. (Ed.), Words of fire: An anthology of African-American feminist thought (pp. 234–240). The New Press.
23.
CôtéJ. E. (2009). Youth-identity studies: History, controversies and future directions. In FurlongA. (Ed.), Routledge handbook of youth and young adulthood (pp. 267–376). Routledge.
24.
CrenshawK. W. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
25.
DaviesB. (2021). Entanglement in the world’s becoming and the doing of new materialist inquiry. Routledge.
26.
de BeauvoirS. (1952). The second sex (ParshleyH. M., Trans.). Vintage Books. (Original work published 1949)
27.
DeCuir-GunbyJ. T.ChapmanT. K.SchutzP. A. (2019). Understanding critical race research methods and methodologies: Lessons from the field. Routledge.
28.
de FreitasE. (2014). How theories of perception deploy the line: Reconfiguring students’ bodies through topo-philosophy. Educational Theory, 64(3), 285–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12062
29.
de FreitasE.CuringaM. X. (2015). New materialist approaches to the study of language and identity: Assembling the posthuman subject. Curriculum Inquiry, 45(3), 249–265. http://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.2015.1031059
30.
DentonJ. M. (2019). Queer theory: Deconstructing sexual and gender identity, norms, and developmental assumptions. In AbesE. S.JonesS. R.StewartD.-L. (Eds.), Rethinking college student development theory using critical frameworks (pp. 55–63). Stylus.
31.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (2017). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE.
32.
DillB. T.ZambranaR. (Eds.). (2009). Emerging intersections: Race, class, and gender in theory, policy, and practice. Rutgers University Press.
33.
DillardC. B. (2012). Learning to (re)member the things we’ve learned to forget: Endarkened feminisms, spirituality, and the sacred nature of research and teaching. Peter Lang Press.
34.
DuffyJ. (2019). Parenting the new teen in the age of anxiety: A complete guide to your child’s stressed, depressed, expanded, amazing adolescence. Mango.
35.
EllingsonL. L.SotirinP. (2020). Making data in qualitative research: Engagements, ethics, and entanglements. Routledge.
36.
ElliotA. (Ed.). (2021). Routledge handbook of identity studies. Routledge.
37.
Evans-WintersV. (2019). Black feminism in qualitative inquiry: A mosaic for writing our daughter’s body. Routledge.
38.
FullagarS.TaylorC. A. (2022). Assemblage. In MurrisK. (Ed.), A glossary for doing postqualitative, new materialist and critical posthumanist research across disciplines (pp. 32–33). Routledge.
39.
GonzalesG.Loret de MolaE.GavulicK. A.McKayT.PurcellC. (2020). Mental health needs among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender college students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Adolescent Mental Health, 67, 645–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.08.006
40.
GreggM.SeigworthG. J. (Eds.). (2010). The affect theory reader. Duke University Press.
41.
GroszE. (2008). Chaos, territory, art: Deleuze and the framing of the earth. Columbia University Press.
42.
GubaE. G. (1990). The paradigm dialogue. SAGE.
43.
HarrisJ. C.PoonO. A. (2019). Critical race theory: Interrogating race and racism in college students’ development. In AbesE. S.JonesS. R.StewartD.-L. (Eds.), Rethinking college student development theory using critical frameworks (pp. 17–25). Stylus.
44.
HibbsB. J.RostainA. (2019). The stressed years of their lives: Helping your kid survive and thrive during the college years. St. Martin’s Press.
45.
HøjgaardL.SøndergaardD. O. (2011). Theorizing the complexities of discursive and material subjectivity: Agential realism and poststructural analyses. Theory & Psychology, 21(3), 338–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354309359965
46.
HolmesR. (2012). A fantastic decomposition: Unsettling the fury of having to wait. Qualitative Inquiry, 18(7), 544–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800412450158
47.
hooksb. (1984). Feminist theory: From margin to center. South End Press.
48.
hooksb. (2007). Ain’t I a woman: Black women and feminism. The South End Press Collective.
49.
IngoldT. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. Routledge.
50.
IngoldT. (2016). Lines. Routledge.
51.
IngoldT. (2021). Correspondences. Polity Press.
52.
IrigarayL. (1985). Speculum of the other woman (GillG. C., Trans.). Cornell University Press. (Original work published 1974)
53.
JacksonA. Y.MazzeiL. A. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. Routledge.
Koro-LjungbergM.LöytönenT.TesarM. (Eds.). (2017). Disrupting data in qualitative inquiry: Entanglements with the post-critical and post-anthropocentric. Peter Lang Press.
56.
KyröläK. (2017). Feeling bad and Precious (2009): Black suffering, white guilt, and intercorporeal subjectivity. Subjectivity, 10(3), 258–275. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41286-017-0029-7
57.
LangeA. C.StewartD.-L. (2019). High-impact practices. In AbesE. S.JonesS. R.StewartD.-L. (Eds.), Rethinking college student development theory using critical frameworks (pp. 221–235). Stylus.
LatherP.St. PierreE. A. (2013). Post-qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 629–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788752
60.
Lenz TaguchiH.PalmerA. (2013). A more “livable” school?: A diffractive analysis of the performative enactments of girls’ ill-/well-being with(in) school environments. Gender and Education, 26(6), 671–687. http://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2013.829909
61.
LovelessN. (2019). How to make art at the end of the world: A manifesto for research-creation. Duke University Press.
62.
MacLureM. (2013). Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 658–667. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788755
63.
MatiasC. E. (2016). Feeling white: Whiteness, emotionality, and emotion. Sense Publishers.
Monture-AngusP. (1995). Thunder in my soul: A Mohawk woman speaks. Fernwood.
66.
MorssJ. R. (1996). Growing critical: Alternatives to developmental psychology. Routledge.
67.
MurrayJ. L.ArnettJ. J. (2019). Emerging adulthood and higher education: A new student development paradigm. Routledge.
68.
MurrisK. (Ed.). (2021). Navigating the postqualitative, new materialist and critical posthumanist terrain across disciplines: An introductory guide. Routledge.
NordstromS. N. (2021). Plural pasts, presents, and futures of postqualitative inquiry: Two questions for the field. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(2), 247–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800420931130
71.
OkelloW. K. (2020). “Loving flesh”: Self-love, student development theory, and the coloniality of being. Journal of College Student Development, 61(6), 717–732. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2020.0071
72.
ReyesN. A. S.TaualaM. (2019). Indigenous paradigms: Decolonizing college student development theory through centering relationality. In AbesE. S.JonesS. R.StewartD.-L. (Eds.), Rethinking college student development theory using critical frameworks (pp. 45–54). Stylus.
73.
SmithL. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples (2nd ed.). Zed Books.
74.
SmithersL. E.EatonP. W. (2017). Nomadic subjectivity: Movement in contemporary student development theory. Thresholds, 40(1), 68–92. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11875/2368
75.
St. PierreE. A. (1997). Methodology in the fold and the irruption of transgressive data. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 10(2), 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/095183997237278
TrumanS. E. (2022). Feminist speculations and the practice of research-creation: Writing pedagogies and intertextual affects. Routledge.
78.
TsingA. L. (2015). The mushroom at the end of the world: On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton University Press.
79.
TuckE.McKenzieM. (2015). Relational validity and the “where” of inquiry: Place and land in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(7), 633–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414563809
