The bricolage of discourses that is part of the mystory approach offers a way to make sense of disparate resources relevant to the study of everyday life. These resources can include popular culture and social media materials, interviews and observations, and academic literature. Here, I explain what mystory is, as well as how and why I fused together personal (autoethnographic), popular and different kinds of academic discourses as bricolage. By layering difference discourses (popular, field-based, academic) with personal reflections (memory), I created coherent narratives that explicitly answered research questions. By weaving these different discourses into distinct patterns of thinking and writing, I found a way to balance my voice alongside the voices of my research participants and other artifacts of their world of cafés, roasteries, coffee, and the Internet to overcome writers’ block. As such, this is also a story of how I found my voice through autoethnography.
AdamsT. E.BoylornR. M.TillmanL. M. (2021). Righting and writing (for) our lives: Turning inward when the world falls apart. In AdamsT. E.BoylornR. M.TillmannL. M. (Eds.), Advances in autoethnography: Reflections on the legacy of Carolyn Ellis and Arthur Bochner (pp. 1–14). Routledge.
2.
AdamsT. E.Holman JonesS. (2008). Autoethnography is queer. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S.SmithL. T. (Eds.), Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies (pp. 373–390). SAGE.
3.
AdamsT. E.Holman JonesS. (2011). Telling stories: Reflexivity, queer theory, and autoethnography. Cultural Studies↔Critical Methodologies, 11(2), 108–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708611401329
4.
AdamsT. E.Holman-JonesS.EllisC. (2022). Introduction—Making sense and taking action: Creating a caring community of autoethnographers. In AdamsT. E.Holman-JonesS.EllisC. (Eds.), Handbook of autoethnography (2nd ed., pp. 1–19). Routledge.
5.
ArroyoS. (2009). The Medium is the Medium: Writing with Digital Movies. In CarterT.ClaytonM.A. (Eds.). Writing and the iGeneration: Composition in the Computer-Mediated Classroom, (pp. 245–259) Southlake: Fountainhead.
BochnerA. P.EllisC. (2021). Epilogue: Autoethnography as a warm idea. In AdamsT. E.BoylornR. M.TillmannL. M. (Eds.), Advances in autoethnography: Reflections on the legacy of Carolyn Ellis and Arthur Bochner (pp. 250–254). Routledge.
8.
ChawlaD. (2022). Walk, walking, talking home. In AdamsT. E.Holman-JonesS.EllisC. (Eds.), Handbook of autoethnography (2nd ed., pp. 513–520). Routledge.
CummingsD. (2021). Searching for Utopia in rural queer narratives. In AdamsT. E.BoylornR. M.TillmannL. M. (Eds.), Advances in autoethnography: Reflections on the legacy of Carolyn Ellis and Arthur Bochner (pp. 155–171). Routledge.
GiorgioG. (2013). Reflections on writing through memory in autoethnography. In JonesS. HolmanAdamsT.E.EllisC. (Eds). The handbook of autoethnography. (pp. 406-424). Walnut Creek, C.A.: Left Coast Press Inc.
Holman JonesS.AdamsT. E. (2010). Autoethnography and queer theory: Making possibilities. In DenzinN. K.GiardinaM. D. (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry and human rights (pp.136–157). Left Coast Press, Inc
21.
IosefoF.Holman JonesS.HarrisA. (2021). Introduction: Critical autoethnography and/as wayfinding in the global south. In IosefoF.Holman JonesS.HarrisA. (Eds.), Wayfinding and critical autoethnography (pp. 1–12). Routledge.
22.
JagoB. J. (2021). Risk and reward in autoethnography: Revisiting “chronicling an academic depression.” In AdamsT. E.BoylornR. M.TillmannL. M. (Eds.), Advances in autoethnography: Reflections on the legacy of Carolyn Ellis and Arthur Bochner (pp. 15–26). Routledge.
23.
JenksE. B. (2002). Searching for autoethnographic credibility: Reflections from a mom with a note pad. In BochnerA.EllisC. (Eds.), Ethnographically speaking: Autoethnography, literature, and aesthetics (pp. 170–186). AltaMira Press.
24.
LapadatJ. C. (2017). Ethics in Autoethnography and Collaborative Autoethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(8) 589–603. https://doi.org/10.10.1177/107780
25.
MadisonD. S. (2012). Critical ethnography: Method, ethics, and performance (2nd ed.). SAGE.
26.
MagoldaP. (1999). Mystories about alternative discourses in a qualitative inquiry seminar. Qualitative Inquiry, 5(2), 208–243.
MillsC. W. (1970). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
OlesenH. S. (2015, August11–14). A psycho-societal approach to lifelong learning. Why? How? [Paper presentation]. Paper presented at Lifelong learning and everyday life—Methodological and theoretical approaches Summer Seminar, Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark.
30.
OlesenH. S.WeberK. (2001). Space for experience and learning: Theorizing the subjective side of work. In WeberK. (Ed.), Experience and discourse: Theorizing professions and subjectivity (pp. 27–58). Adult Education Research Group; Roskilde University Press.
RaimondiG. A.MoreiraC.de BarrosN. F. (2020). This text is (not) a scientific paper. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(7), 931–940. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419868510
33.
RathJ. (2009). Writing my migrant selves: Using mystory to script a multi-reflective account of context appropriate pedagogy. Reflective Practice, 10(2), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623940902786131
34.
RonaiC. R. (1995). Multiple reflections of child sex abuse: An argument for a layered account. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 23(4), 395–426.
SparkesA. C. (2021). Making a spectacle of oneself in the academy using the H-Index: From becoming an artificial person to laughing at absurdities. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(8–9), 1027–1039.
37.
SparkesA. C. (2002). Autoethnography: Self-indulgence or something more? In BochnerA.EllisC. (Eds.), Ethnographically speaking: Autoethnography, literature and aesthetics (pp. 209–232). Altamira Press.
38.
TamasS. (2018). Performance autoethnography, critical inquiry, and the future of ICQI: Three “truths” and a lie. International Review of Qualitative Research, 11(1), 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1525/irqr.2018.11.1.57
