Here the author presents a sequentially yet nonlinearly organized collage of previously published writing, curated under the title “Replication Crisis: Framing Science for Untold Crimes.” The collage is composed entirely of quotations. Here, a thesis-driven expository regime is replaced with open-ended discursive potential. The excerpts include assessments of the replication crisis in science; discussions of p values and their centrality in the crisis; reviews and analysis of recent scientific hoaxes, “sting” operations, and/or fraudulent studies (some attempting to delegitimize poststructuralist, postmodernist, and feminist critiques of science); discussions of the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis and Wittgensteinian language games; and quotations from contemporary social theory and literature. The collage, as an experiment, offers readers an opportunity for re-contextualization through their own associative sense-making. Readers determine what is important information, what might be fruitfully compared and contrasted, and how discourses come to “mean.”
BergerL. S. (1991). Substance abuse as symptom: A psychoanalytic critique of treatment. The Analytic Press.
12.
BiancuzziF.WardenS. (2009). Masterminds of programming: Conversations with the creators of major programming languages. O’Riley Media.
13.
BourdieuP. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press.
14.
CaldwellC. (2020). The age of entitlement: America since the sixties. Simon & Schuster.
15.
DenzinN. K.GiardinaM. D. (2016). Introduction: The elephant in the living room, OR advancing the conversation about the politics of evidence. In DenzinN.GiardinaM. (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry and the politics of evidence (pp. 9–51). Sage.
16.
DerridaJ. (1978). Writing and difference [Introduction; BassA., Trans.]. The University of Chicago Press.
17.
EbnerJ. (2020). Going dark: The secret social lives of extremists. Bloomsbury.
GreeneL. (2018). Talk on the wild side: Why language can’t be tamed. The Economist.
27.
GreerJ. M. (2009). The ecotechnic future: Envisioning a post-peak world. New Society Publishers.
28.
GrimesD. R.BachC. T.IoannidisJ. P. A. (2018). Modelling science trustworthiness under publish or perish pressure. Royal Society Open Science, 5, 171511. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.171511
29.
HannayT. (2012). The controlled experiment. In BrockmanJ. (Ed.), This will make you smarter: 150 new scientific concepts to improve your thinking (pp. 25–27). Harper Perennial.
HardingS. (2004). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is “strong objectivity?” In HardingS. (Ed.), The feminist standpoint theory reader: Intellectual & political controversies (pp. 127–140). Routledge.
32.
HardingS. (2011). Preface. In HardingS. (Ed.), The postcolonial science and technology studies reader (pp. ix–xiii). Duke University Press.
33.
HarfordT. (2021). The data detective: Ten easy rules to make sense of statistics. Riverhead Books.
34.
HorkheimerM.AdornoT. W. (2002). Dialectic of enlightenment: Philosophical fragments. Stanford University Press.
35.
HossenfelderS. (2020). Lost in math: How beauty leads physics astray. Basic Books.
KitchinR. (2014). The data revolution: Big data, open data, data infrastructures and their consequences. SAGE.
42.
KonnikovaM. (2013). Mastermind: How to think like Sherlock Holmes. Penguin Books.
43.
LaingR. D. (1970). Knots. Vintage Books.
44.
LakatosI. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In LakatosI.MusgraveA. (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91–195). Cambridge University Press.
45.
LatourB. (1993). We have never been modern (PorterC., Trans.). Harvard University Press.
46.
LessingD. (1962). The golden notebook. McGraw Hill.
47.
LevittS. D.DubnerS. J. (2009). Freakonomics: A rogue economist explores the hidden side of everything. William Morrow.
LubbockJ. (2005). The beauties of nature and the wonders of the world we live in. Macmillan. (Original work published 1892)
50.
Mayer-SchönbergerV.CukierK. (2014). Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work and think. John Murray.
51.
MurrayC. (2020). Human diversity: The biology of gender, race, and class. Twelve.
52.
OkrentA. (2010). In the land of invented languages: Adventures in linguistic creativity, madness, and genius. Random House.
53.
PetersM. A. (2020). Language-games philosophy: Language-games as rationality and method. Educational Philosophy and Theory. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1821190
54.
PinkerS. (2021). Rationality: What it is, why it seems scarce, why it matters. Viking Press.
55.
ProtoF. (2003). Mass identity architecture: Architectural writings of Jean Baudrillard. John Wiley.
56.
ProtoF. (2019). Baudrillard for architects. Routledge.
57.
ReeceB. (2018). The fourth age: Smart robots, conscious computers, and the future of humanity. Atria Books.
RitchieS. (2020). Science fictions: How fraud, bias, negligence, and hype undermine the search for truth. Metropolitan Books.
61.
RostF. (2021). Q-sort methodology: Bridging the divide between qualitative and quantitative. An introduction to an innovative method for psychotherapy research. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21, 98–106.
SmithD. E. (2004). Women’s perspective as a radical critique of sociology. In HardingS. (Ed.), The feminist standpoint theory reader: Intellectual & political controversies (pp. 21–33). Routledge.
66.
SpiegelhalterD. (2019). The art of statistics: How to learn from data. Basic Books.
67.
StrevensM. (2020). The knowledge machine: How irrationality created modern science. Liveright Publishing.
68.
SubramanianS. (2020). A dominant character: The radical science and restless politics of J. B. S. Haldane. W.W. Norton.
69.
SwartzA. (2016). The boy who could change the world: The writings of Aaron Swartz [Introduction by LessigL.]. New Press.
70.
TaplinJ. (2017). Move fast and break things: How Facebook, Google, and Amazon cornered culture and undermined democracy. Little, Brown.
71.
Teixeira da SilvaJ. A.Al-KhatibA. (2016). Questioning the ethics of John Bohannon’s hoaxes and stings in the context of science publishing. KOME—An International Journal of Pure Communication Inquiry, 4(1), 84–88. http://komejournal.com/files/KOME_TdaSAceil.pdf
72.
von SavignyE. (2002). No chapter “on philosophy” in the philosophical investigations. In ShankerS.KilfoyleD. (Eds.), Ludwig Wittgenstein: Critical assessments of leading philosophers (Second Series, Volume II: The later Wittgenstein: From philosophical investigations to on certainty) (pp. 39–51). Routledge.
