The imperative for decolonial research methodology has been long discoursed in academia. However, there remains a rift between dominant colonial research practices in the academy and the needs of researchers of color. In this article, I explore autohistoria-teoría as a decolonial research methodology by weaving between personal narrative, magical thinking, and contemporary academic discourse on autoethnographical research methods. I will exemplify both the uniqueness and importance of spirit in Anzaldúa’s iteration of autohistoria-teoría. Finally, I will challenge the academy’s perception of autoethnographical research methods as navel gazing and reframe autohistoria-teoría as decolonial praxis, and as such does not need adhere to the validity paradigm of western hegemonic knowledge production.
AllenP. G. (1986). The sacred hoop: Recovering the feminine in American Indian traditions. Beacon Press.
2.
AllenP. G. (1998). Off the reservation: Reflections on boundary-busting, border-crossing, loose cannons. Beacon.
3.
Allen-CollinsonJ.HockeyJ. C. (2008). Autoethnography as “valid” methodology? A study of disrupted identity narratives. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 3(6), 209–217.
4.
AnzaldúaG. (1987). Borderlands, la frontera: The new mestiza. Aunt Lute Books.
5.
AnzaldúaG. (1990). Bridge, drawbridge, sandbar or island. In AlbrechtL. D.BrewerR. M. (Eds.), Bridges of power: Women’s multicultural alliances (pp. 216–231). New Society Publishers.
6.
AnzaldúaG. (2015). Light in the dark/Luz en lo Oscuro: Rewriting identity, spirituality, reality. Duke University Press.
7.
AxelsenD. E. (1985). Women as victims of medical experimentation: J. Marion Sims’ surgery on slave women. Sage, 2(2), 1845–1850.
8.
BhattacharyaK.KeatingA. (2017). Expanding beyond public and private realities: Evoking Anzaldúan Autohistoria-teoría in two voices. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(5), 345–354.
9.
ChilisaB. (2011). Indigenous research methodologies. SAGE.
GutiérrezE. (2016). “We Will No Longer be Silent or Invisible” Latinas organizing for reproductive justice. In RossL.GutiérrezE.GerberM.SillimanJ. (Eds.), Undivided rights: Women of color organizing for reproductive justice (pp. 215–240). Haymarket Books.
KeatingA. (2015). Editor’s introduction. In KeatingA. (Ed.), Light in the Dark/Luz en lo Oscar: Rewriting Identity, spirituality, reality (pp. ix–xxxvii). Duke University Press.
LordeA. (2003). The master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house. In LewisR.MillsS. (Eds.), Feminist postcolonial theory: A reader (pp. 25–27). Taylor & Francis.
16.
MartinezJ. M. (2000). Phenomenology of Chicana experience and identity: Communication and transformation in praxis. Rowman & Littlefield.
17.
Mercado-LópezL. (2011). “I feel a revolution occur in my womb”: Mapping cognitive and somatic transformation through readings of mestiza maternal facultad [Doctoral dissertation]. ProQuest. (UMI No. 3473376)
18.
OlmosM. F.Paravisini-GebertL. (2011). Creole religions of the Caribbean: An introduction from Vodou and Santería to Obeah and Espiritismo. New York University Press.
19.
OrtegaM. (2016). Speaking in resistant tongues: Latina feminism, embodied knowledge, and transformation. Hypatia, 31(2), 313–318.
20.
PérezE. (1999). The decolonial imaginary: Writing Chicanas into history. Indiana University Press.
21.
PérezE. (2016). The ontology of twerk: From “sexy” Black movement style to Afro-Diasporic sacred dance. African and Black Diaspora: An International Journal, 9(1), 16–31.
22.
SandovalC. (2000). Methodology of the oppressed (Vol. 18). University of Minnesota Press.
23.
SellersS. A.CaseM. (2017). Weaving the legacy: Remembering Paula Gunn Allen. West End Press.
24.
SmithL. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples. Zed Books.
25.
YoungS. (1997). Changing the world: Discourse, politics, and the feminist movement. Routledge.
