Biodesign disrupts the traditional temporalities of expectation and demand in wider design economies because designers are not selecting from a range of prefabricated samples from which they manufacture a product. Instead, they are plunged into the durations of other organisms for the simple reason that they must wait for something to grow. Situated in this context, this article considers how we might conceptualize these events of “waiting” such that we intensify their importance for ecological thought. In the philosophy of Henri Bergson, events of waiting are important as a mode of intuiting a register of movement beyond human habits of perception, what he refers to as duration. In this article, I suggest that thinking events of waiting in biodesign via Bergson intervenes in debates surrounding posthuman creativity, not because it multiplies creative agents but because it cultivates a sympathy for temporal ecologies from which human perception is alienated.
Ansell-PearsonK. (2018). Bergson: Thinking beyond the human condition. Bloomsbury.
3.
ArmstrongR. (2018). Soft living architecture: An alternative view of bio-informed practice. Bloomsbury.
4.
ArrigoE. (2018). The key role of retail stores in fast fashion companies: The H&M case study. In ChowP. S.ChiuC. H.YipC. Y. A.Tang AK. Y. (Eds.), Contemporary case studies on fashion production, marketing and operations: Springer series in fashion business (pp. 121–137). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7007-5_8
BergsonH. (2001). Time and free will: An essay on the immediate data of consciousness [PogsonF. L., Trans.]. Dover Books.
13.
BergsonH. (2007). The creative mind: An introduction to metaphysics [AndisonM. L., Trans.]. Dover Books.
14.
BrigstockeJ.NooraniT. (2016). Posthuman attunements: Aesthetics, authority and the arts of creative listening. Geohumanities, 2(1), 1–7.
15.
CamereS.KaranaE. (2017). Growing materials for product design. In Proceedings of the international conference of the DRS special interest group on experiential knowledge and emerging materials (pp. 101–115). Delft University of Technology.
16.
CastreeN. (2003). Commodifying what nature?Progress in Human Geography, 27, 273–297.
17.
CharltonD. G. (1979). France: A companion to French studies. Routledge.
18.
ColebrookC. (2012). The art of the future. In LefebvreA.WhiteM. (Eds.), Bergson, politics, and religion (pp. 75–96). Duke University Press.
19.
ColebrookC. (2017). Sex and the (Anthropocene) city. Theory, Culture & Society, 34(2–3), 39–60.
De FreitasE.TrumanS. E. (2021). New empiricisms in the Anthropocene: Thinking with speculative fiction about science and social inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(5), 522–533. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800420943643
24.
DeleuzeG. (1991). Bergsonism [TomlinsonH.HabberjamB., Trans.]. Zone Books.
25.
DixonD.HawkinsH.StraughanE. (2012). Of human birds and living rocks: Remaking aesthetics for post-human worlds. Dialogues in Human Geography, 2(3), 249–270.
26.
EscobarA. (2018). Designs for the pluriverse: Radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Duke University Press.
GroszE. (2005). Bergson, Deleuze and the becoming of unbecoming. Parallax, 11(2), 4–13.
29.
GrusinR. (2015). The nonhuman turn. University of Minnesota Press.
30.
GuattariF. (2000). The three ecologies. Continuum.
31.
HarrisA. (2018). Creative agency / creative ecologies. In SnepvangersK.ThomsonP.HarrisA. (Eds.), Creativity policy, partnerships and practice in education: Creativity, education and the arts (pp. 65–88). Palgrave Macmillan.
32.
HarrisD. (2021). Creative agency: A manifesto for posthuman creativity studies—In creative agency. Palgrave Macmillan.
33.
HörlE. (2017). Introduction to general ecology. In HörlE.BurtonJ. (Eds.), General ecology: The new ecological paradigm (pp. 1–73). Bloomsbury.
34.
KaranaE.BlauwhoffD.HultinkE.-J.CamereS. (2018). When the material grows: A case study on designing (with) mycelium-based materials. International Journal of Design, 12(2), 119–136.
35.
KatzC. (1998). Private productions of space and the “preservation” of nature. In BraunB.CastreeN. (Eds.), Remaking reality: Nature at the millenium (pp. 46–63). Routledge.
36.
LapoujadeD. (2018). Powers of time: Versions of Bergson. Univocal.
37.
LapworthA. (2021). Responsibility before the world: Cinema, perspectivism and a nonhuman ethics of individuation. Deleuze and Guattari Studies, 15(3), 386–410.
LinsteadS.MullarkeyJ. (2003). Time, creativity and culture: Introducing Bergson. Culture and Organization, 9(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/147595503027
40.
Moulard-LeonardV. (2008). Bergson-Deleuze encounters: Transcendental experience and the thought of the virtual. State University of New York Press.
41.
MullarkeyJ. (1995). Bergson’s method of multiplicity. Metaphilosophy, 26(3), 230–259.
42.
MyersW. (2012). Biodesign: Nature, science, creativity. Thames and Hudson.
PalmerJ. (2021). Putting forests to work? Enrolling vegetal labor in the socioecological fix of bioenergy resource making. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 111(1), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2020.1749022
RousellD. (2021). A map you can walk into: Immersive cartography and the speculative potentials of data. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(5), 580–597. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800420935927
48.
SawaM. (2016). The laboratory life of a designer at the intersection with algal biotechnology. Architectural Research Quarterly, 20, 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1359135516000191
49.
SinclairM. (2020). Bergson. Routledge.
50.
StengersI. (2005). Introductory notes on an ecology of practices. Cultural Studies Review, 11(1), 183–196.
ThieleK. (2008). The thought of becoming: Gilles Deleuze’s poetics of Life. Diaphanes.
53.
TsingA. L. (2015). The mushroom at the end of the world. Princeton University Press.
54.
WhiteM. (2019). The politics of sympathy in Bergson’s “the two sources of morality and religion.” In PittsA. J.WestmorelandM. W. (Eds.), Beyond Bergson: Examining race and colonialism through the writings of Henri Bergson (pp. 57–76). State University of New York Press.
55.
WidderN. (2012). Deleuze on Bergsonian duration and Nietzsche’s eternal return. In HerzogenrathB. (Ed.), Time and history in Deleuze and Serres (pp. 127–146). Continuum.
56.
WilliamsN. (2016). Creative processes: From interventions in art to intervallic experiments through Bergson. Environment and Planning A, 48(8), 1549–1564.
57.
WilliamsN.ColletC. (2021). Biodesign and the allure of “grow-made” textiles: An interview with Carole Collet. Geohumanities, 7(1), 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/2373566X.2020.1816141
