The social impact of reading the book Radical Love cannot be grasped by the dominant discourse on the evaluation of social impact. A deep understanding of autobiographical memories must go beyond the quantitative analysis of details and episodes to qualitatively examine the meanings constructed through recollection. Thus, we explored young women’s memories of intimate partner violence through memory narratives and the way these memories were reconstructed when the women read Radical Love. In addition, we examined the personal meanings given to this reading experience through in-depth interviews and a focus group. The results showed that Radical Love made the participants more critical about their memories and made these memories unappealing. This reading led some women to leave violent relationships and transform their prospective thinking. In a time when impact is measured mainly by research articles, this qualitative analysis of the memory transformation promoted by reading Radical Love demonstrates that books can also have a social impact.
Cabré-OlivéJ.FlechaR.IonescuV.PulidoC.Sordé-MartíT. (2017). Identifying the relevance of research goals through collecting citizens’ voices on social media. International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences, 6(1), 70–102. https://doi.org/10.17583/rimcis.2017.2652
2.
CarrilloA.Girbés-PecoS.De BottonL.Valls-CarolR. (2017). The role of communicative acts in the dream process: Engaging Moroccan migrants in a community development initiative in urban Spain. Community Development Journal, 54, 197–214.
3.
ChakrabortyS.KumarS.SubramaniamM. (2017). Safe city: Analysis of services for gender-based violence in Bengaluru, India. International Sociology, 32(3), 299–322.
4.
ConwayM. A.HolmesA. (2004). Psychosocial stages and the availability of autobiographical memories. Journal of Personality, 72, 461–480.
5.
ConwayM. A.Pleydell-PearceC. W. (2000). The construction of autobiographical memories in the self-memory system. Psychological Review, 107(2), 261–288.
6.
ConwayM. A.RubinD. C. (1993). The structure of autobiographical memory. In CollinsA. F.GathercoleS. E.ConwayM. A.MorrisP. E. (Eds.), Theories of memory (pp. 103–137). Laurence Erlbaum.
7.
DenzinN.LincolnS. I.GiardinaM. D. (2011). Disciplining qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19(6), 769–782.
FlechaA.PuigvertL. (2010). Contributions to social theory from dialogic feminism. In ChapmanP. (Ed.), Teaching social theory (pp. 161–174). Peter Lang.
11.
FlechaR.PuigvertL.RiosO. (2013). The new alternative masculinities and the overcoming of gender violence. International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences, 2(1), 88–113.
12.
FlechaR.Soler-GallartM.SordéT. (2015). Social impact: Europe must fund social sciences. Nature, 528(7581), Article 193.
13.
García-CarriónR.Molina-LuqueF.RoldánS. M. (2017). How do vulnerable youth complete secondary education? The key role of families and the community. Journal of Youth Studies, 27(14), 1–16.
14.
GinerE. (2011) Amistad deseada. Aportaciones de Jesús Gómez y Ramón Flecha que están acercando la realidad a nuestros sueños [Desired friendship. Contributions by Jesús Gómez and Ramón Flecha that are getting closer the reality to our dreams]. Hipatia.
15.
GómezA. (2014). How friendship generates key research questions that help to overcome gender-based violence: A personal narrative. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(7), 934–940.
16.
GómezJ. (2015). Radical love: A revolution for the 21st century. Peter Lang.
KandelE. R. (2007). In search of memory: The emergence of a new science of mind. W. W. Norton.
19.
KensingerE. A. (2009). Remembering the details: Effects of emotion. Emotion Review, 1(2), 99–113.
20.
KleinS. B.RobertsonT. E.DeltonA. W. (2010). Facing the future: Memory as an evolved system for planning future acts. Memory and Cognition, 38(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.1.13
21.
McDonaldK. (1998). Defining the nature of attraction. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 44, 14–15.
22.
PuigvertL. (2015–2016). Free teen desire. Transforming adolescents’ desires through dialogue for relationships free of violence (This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Grant Agreement No. 659299).
23.
PuigvertL. (2016). Female university students respond to gender violence through dialogic feminist gatherings. International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences, 5(2), 183–203.
24.
RamónyCajalS. (1917). Recuerdos de mi vida [Recollections of my life]. Crítica.
25.
RíosO.ChristouM. (2010). Más allá del lenguaje sexista: Actos comunicativos en las relaciones afectivo-sexuales de los y las adolescentes. Revista Signos, 43, 311–326.
26.
SearleJ.SolerM. (2004). Lenguaje y ciencias sociales [Language and social sciences]. El Roure.
27.
Soler-GallartM. (2017). Achieving social impact. Sociology in the public sphere. Springer.
28.
VallsR.PuigvertL.DuqueE. (2008). Gender violence among teenagers: Socialization and prevention. Violence against Women, 14(7), 759–785.
29.
Wade-ClarkeD. (2016). Fighting against forgetting: Remembering the places where my relationship with my father came into being. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(6), 473–477.
