Three poet-researchers conduct three different readings of Tishani Doshi’s poem A Fable for the 21st Century. We ask how as creative practitioners and critics we can negotiate the desire for mastery of a text, and the dangers a semiotic reading presents, allowing for difference, indecision, and complexity. We present our initial readings of the poem and summarize our discussions of them grounded in the transactional reading theory of Louise Rosenblatt and nuanced by assemblage theory. A final section includes three original poems written in response to Doshi, together with a brief discussion of them, and forms part of our conclusion.
FishS. (1980). Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities. Harvard University Press.
11.
JoughinJ.MalpasS. (2013). The new aestheticism: An introduction. In JoughinJ.MalpasS. (Eds.), The new aestheticism (pp. 1-19). Manchester University Press.
12.
LeitchV. B. (2001). Introduction to theory and criticism. In LeitchV. B. (Ed.), The Norton anthology of theory and criticism (pp. 1–28). Norton.
13.
LucyN. (2001). Beyond semiotics: Text, culture and technology. Continuum.
McQuillanM. (2001). There is no such thing as reader-response theory. In WolfreysJ. (Ed.), Introducing literary theories: A guide and glossary (139-148). Edinburgh University Press.
16.
RiffaterreM. (1978). Semiotics of poetry. Indiana University Press.
17.
RosenblattL. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Southern Illinois University Press.
18.
SpivakG. C. (2000). Feminism and critical theory. In LodgeD. (Ed.), Modern criticism and theory. Pearson.
19.
ToddR.McKnightL.BullockO. (2017). Displaced metaphors: Collaborative poetic responses to language in a postphysical world. TEXT: A Journal of Writing and Writing Courses, 21(1). http://www.textjournal.com.au/april17/todd_et_al.htm
