St. Pierre describes post qualitative inquiry as something that “must be created, invented anew each time” and as residing on an ontological plane of possibles. What we present below are a series of possibles.
BrownS. P. (2017). Doing, undoing, and redoing collegiate athletics: Conceptual tales of marginality and mattering [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Appalachian State University].
3.
ButlerJ. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex.”Routledge.
4.
ButlerJ. (2004). Undoing gender. Routledge.
5.
ButlerJ. (2005). Giving an account of oneself. Fordham University Press.
6.
CharmazK. (2016). The power of stories and the potential of theorizing for social justice studies. In DenzinN.GiardinaM. (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry through a critical lens (pp. 41–56). Routledge.
7.
DenzinN.GiardinaM. (2009). Introduction qualitative inquiry and social justice: Toward a politics of hope. In DenzinN.GiardinaM. (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry and social justice (pp. 11–50). Left Coast Press.
8.
FosterW. (1986). Paradigms and promises: New approaches to educational administration. Prometheus Books.
9.
JacksonA. Y. (2017). Thinking without method. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(9), 666–674.
10.
JacksonA. Y.MazzeiL. A. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. Routledge.
11.
SpivakG. C. (1993). Outside in the teaching machine. Routledge.
12.
St. PierreE. A. (1997) Methodology in the fold and the irruption of transgressive data. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 10(2), 175–189.
13.
St. PierreE. A. (2011). Post qualitative research: The critique and the coming after. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 611–626). SAGE.
14.
St. PierreE. A. (2017). Haecceity: Laying out a plane for post qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(9), 686–698.
