This article addresses how researchers have drawn from qualitative methods when engaging with/in liminal populations, with a focus on historically marginalized populations and their rhetorical and material (dis)placement. As scholars housed within distinct domains of educational scholarship, we embrace this opportunity to “think-with-theory” and collaborate across methodological and theoretical differences. Ecologies of liminal (in)humanisms are discussed across analytic snapshots of seemingly incommensurate empirical research traversing analytic domains: state, institutions, and practices. We consider a liminality of (in)human politics, one that unravels the entanglement of what data, research/er, and method(ology) are in our contemporary context.
CannonS. O. (2018). Teasing transcription: Iterations in the liminal space between voice and text. Qualitative Inquiry, 24, 571-582. doi:10.1177/1077800417742412
11.
Castro SamayoaA.NicolazzoZ. (2017). Affect and/as collective resistance in a post-truth moment. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 30, 988-993. doi:10.1080/09518398.2017.1312595
12.
ChenM. Y. (2012). Animacies: Biopolitics, racial mattering, and queer affect. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
13.
De SchauwerE.Van de PutteI.BlockmansI. G. E.DaviesB. (2018). The intra-active production of normativity and difference. Gender and Education, 30, 607-622. doi:10.1080/09540253.2016.1259463
14.
Dixon-RománE. (2017). Inheriting possibility: Social reproduction & quantification in education. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
15.
EhrenreichB.HochschildA. (2002). Global woman: Nannies, maids, and sex workers in the new economy. New York, NY: Metropolitan Books.
16.
Fernandez-KellyM. P. (1984). For we are sold, I and my people: Women and industry in Mexico’s Frontier. Albany: State University of New York Press.
17.
Fernandez-KellyM. P. (2008). Gender and economic change in the United States and Mexico, 1900–2000. American Behavioral Scientist, 52, 377-404.
18.
GálvezA. (2010). Guadalupe in New York: Devotion and the struggle for citizenship rights. New York: New York University Press.
19.
GálvezA. (2011). Patient citizens, immigrant mothers: Mexican women, public prenatal care, and the birth weight paradox. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
20.
Glick SchillerN.BaschL.Szanton BlancC. (1995). From immigrant to transmigrant: Theorizing transnational migration. Anthropological Quarterly, 68, 48-63.
21.
GroszE. (2010). Feminism, materialism, and freedom. In CooleD.FrostS. (Eds.), New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics (pp. 139-157). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
22.
GuptaA.FergusonJ. (1992). Beyond “culture”: Space, identity, and the politics of difference. Cultural Anthropology, 7, 6-23.
23.
HackingI. (1990). The taming of chance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Hondagneu-SoteloP.AvilaE. (1997). I’m not here but I’m there: The meanings of Latina transnational motherhood. Gender & Society, 11, 548-560.
25.
IgoS. (2008). The averaged American: Surveys, citizens, and the making of a mass public. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
JacksonA.MazzeiL. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge.
27.
JagoseA. (1996). Queer theory: An introduction. New York: New York University Press.
28.
JohnsonE. P. (2001). “ Quare” studies, or (almost) everything I know about queer studies I learned from my grandmother. Text and Performance Quarterly, 21, 1-25.
29.
JohnsonJ. A. (2015). Information systems and the translation of transgender. TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, 2, 160-165. doi:10.1215/23289252-2848940
30.
KearneyM. (1986). From the invisible hand to visible feet: Anthropological studies of migration and development. Annual Review of Anthropology, 15, 331-361.
31.
KearneyM. (2004). Changing fields of anthropology: From local to global. Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield.
MenjívarC. (2006). Liminal legality: Salvadoran and Guatemalan immigrants’ lives in the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 111, 999-1037.
34.
NicolazzoZ. (2017). Trans* in college: Transgender students’ strategies for navigating campus life and the institutional politics of inclusion. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
35.
OliveiraG. (2018). Motherhood across borders: Immigrants and their children in Mexico and New York. New York: New York University Press.
36.
OrtnerS. B. (1997). Fieldwork in the postcommunity. Anthropology and Humanism, 22, 61-80.
37.
ParreñasR. S. (2001). Mothering from a distance: Emotions, gender, and intergenerational relations in Filipino transnational families. Feminist Studies, 27, 361-390.
38.
ParreñasR. S. (2005a). Children of global migration: Transnational families and gendered woes. Manila, Philippines: Ateneo de Manila University Press.
39.
ParreñasR. S. (2005b). The gender paradox in the transnational families of Filipino migrant women. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 14, 243-268.
40.
PorterT. (1986). The rise of statistical thinking: 1820-1900. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
RichA. (1984). Notes towards a politics of location;. In A. Rich Blood, Bread and Poetry: Selected Prose, 1979-1985, (pp. 210-231). London: Little Brown & Co.
43.
RosaldoR. (2014). Vital Topics Forum on Latin@s and the immigration debate. American Anthropologist, 116, 1-14.
44.
SamayoaA. C. (2019). Starting with sexuality: Conceptualizing (mis)translations of sexualities and genders as willful strategies of organizational survival at a Mexican University. In HendersonE.NicolazzoZ. (Eds.), Starting with gender in international higher education research: Conceptual debates and methodological considerations (pp. 83-97). London, England: Routledge.
45.
SchiltK.BratterJ. (2015). From multiracial to transgender? Assessing attitudes toward expanding gender options on the U.S. Census. TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, 2, 77-100.
46.
ScottD. (2000). The re-enchantment of humanism: An interview with Sylvia Wynter. Small Axe: A Caribbean Journal of Criticism, 4, 118-208.
47.
SpadeD. (2015). Normal life: Administrative violence, critical trans politics, and the limits of law. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
48.
TuckE.YangK. W. (2014). R-words: Refusing research. In ParisD.WinnM. (Eds.), Humanizing research: Decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities (pp. 223-248). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
49.
TurnerV. (1974). Liminal to liminoid, in play, flow, and ritual: An essay in comparative symbology. Rice Institute Pamphlet—Rice University Studies, 60(3), 53-92.
50.
WargoJ. M. (2015). “Every selfie tells a story . . .”: LGBTQ youth lifestreams and new media narratives as connective identity texts. New Media & Society, 19, 560-578. doi:10.1177/1461444815612447
51.
WargoJ. M. (2017a). Designing more just social futures or remixing the radical present? Reading LGBTQ youths’ multimodal (counter)storytelling as activist practice. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 16, 145-160.
52.
WargoJ. M. (2017b). #donttagyourhate: Reading collecting and curating as genres of participation in LGBT youth activism on Tumblr. Digital Culture & Education, 9, 14-31.
53.
WeheliyeA. G. (2014). Habeas viscus: Racializing assemblages, biopolitics, and Black feminist theories of the human. Durham: Duke University Press.
54.
YarovaO. (2006). The migration of Ukrainian women to Italy and the impact on their family in Ukraine. In SzczepanikovaA.CanekM.GrillJ. (Eds.), Migration processes in central and Eastern Europe: Unpacking the diversity (pp. 38-41). Prague, Czech Republic: Multicultural Centre.
55.
ZuberiT. (2001). Thicker than blood: How racial statistics lie. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
