This article twists, folds, iterates, and proliferates figurations of field in/of/outside the academy as it works to undercut the taken-for-granted assumptions about the field and its borders and boundaries. I question how making boundaries fuzzy might work to open up radical possibilities for knowledge production and becoming with/in fields. Furthermore, the article considers how the way in which we tell ourselves stories of fields and our place(s) in them matters. How might we do different research or do research differently if we reconsider the cuts we always already make between field/researcher/researched? Can fieldness disappear and would we want it to?
AdlerJ.BallD.KrainerK.LinF. L.NovotnaJ. (2005). Reflections on an emerging field: Researching mathematics teacher education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60, 359-381.
2.
AdlerJ.LermanS. (2003). Getting the description right and making it count: Ethical practice in mathematics education research. In BishopA. J.ClementsM. A.KeitelC.KilpatrickJ.LeungK. F. S. (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 441-470). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
3.
AhmedS. (2006). Queer phenomenology: Orientations, objects, others. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
4.
BaradK. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of meaning and matter. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
5.
BaradK. (2012). On touching: The inhuman that therefore I am. Differences, 23, 206-223.
6.
CannonS. O.MyersK. D.CrossS. B. (2016). Mathematics as (double) gatekeeper, student as bordercrosser: A case study. In WoodM. B.TurnerE. E.CivilM.EliJ. A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (p. 929). Tucson, AZ: The University of Arizona.
7.
CannonS. O. (2020). Making kin with comprehensive exams: Producing scholar in intra-action. Qualitative Inquiry, 26, 36-50. doi:10.1177/1077800419869962
8.
CannonS. O. (2018). Teasing transcription: Iterations in the liminal space between voice and text. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(8), 571-582. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417742412
9.
ColebrookC. (2017). What is this thing called education?Qualitative Inquiry, 23, 649-655.
10.
ConfreyJ. (2017). Research: To inform, deform or reform? In CaiJ. (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 3-27). Washington, DC: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
11.
DaviesB.FlemmenA. B.GannonS.LawsC.WatsonB. (2002). Working on the ground. A collective biography of feminine subjectivities: Mapping the traces of power and knowledge. Social Semiotics, 12, 291-313.
12.
de FreitasE.LermanS.ParksA. N. (2017). Qualitative methods. In CaiJ. (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 159-182). Washington, DC: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
13.
de FreitasE.SinclairN. (2014). Mathematics and the body: Material entanglements in the classroom. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
HarawayD. (1992). The promises of monsters: A regenerative politics for inappropriate/d others. In GrossbergL.NelsonC.TreichlerP. (Eds.), Cultural studies (pp. 295-337). Abingdon, UK: Taylor & Francis.
18.
HarawayD. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucence. Durham. NC: Duke University Press.
19.
HeplerS.CannonS. O.HartnettC.HolbrookT. (2019). Undoing and doing-with: Practices of diffractive reading and writing in higher education. In TaylorC. A.BayleyA. (Eds.), Posthumanism and higher education: Reimagining pedagogy, practice and research (pp. 141-151). Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave.
20.
HolbrookT.CannonS. O. (2018). Threads and fingerprints: Partial and entangled readings and writings of place. In KubyC.SpectorK.ThielJ. J. (Eds.), Posthumanism and literacy education: Knowing/becoming/doing literacies (pp. 21-36). New York, NY: Routledge.
21.
JacksonA. Y.MazzeiL. A. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives:. New York, NY: Routledge.
22.
KilpatrickJ. (1992). A history of research in mathematics education. In GrouwsD. A. (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 3-38). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
23.
KilpatrickJ. (2014). History of research in mathematics education. In LermanS. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 267-272). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Reference.
24.
KimmererR. W. (2015). Braiding sweetgrass: Indigenous wisdom, scientific knowledge, and the teachings of plants. Minneapolis, MN: Milkweed Editions.
25.
KubyC. R.ChristR. C. (2017). Productive aporias and inten(t/s)ionalities of paradigming: Spacetimematterings in an introductory qualitative research course. Qualitative Inquiry, 24, 293-304.
26.
Lenz TaguchiH.St PierreE. A. (2017). Using concept as method in educational and social science inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 23, 643-648.
27.
ManningE. (2016). The minor gesture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
28.
ManningE.MassumiB. (2014). Thought in the act. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
29.
NordstromS. N. (2013). A conversation about spectral data. Cultural Studies↔critical Methodologies, 13, 316-341.
30.
PalmerM.SimmonsG.HallM. (2013). Textbook (non-) adoption motives, legitimizing strategies and academic field configuration. Studies in Higher Education, 38, 485-505. doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.583983
31.
PreissleJ. (2006). Envisioning qualitative inquiry: A view across four decades. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19, 685-695.
32.
SimmonsM.OlssenM.PetersM. A. (Eds.). (2009). Re-reading education policies: A handbook studying the policy agenda of the 21st century. Boston, MA: Sense Publishers.
33.
St. PierreE. A. (1997). Guest Editorial: An introduction to figurations—A poststructural practice of inquiry. Interna-tional Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 10, 279-284. doi:10.1080/095183997237115
34.
St. PierreE. A. (2017). Writing post qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(9), 603-608. doi: 10.1177/1077800417734567
35.
StinsonD. W.WalshawM. (2017). Exploring different theoretical frontiers for different (and uncertain) possibilities in mathematics education research. In CaiJ. (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 128-155). Washington, DC: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
