Updating my earlier engagement with post-neoliberalism, this article looks at the “after” of neoliberalism as a “post” neoliberalism under construction. It is addressed to our “discursive confusion” in the belief that effective political understanding and action might still be possible.
BirchK.DoveE.ChiappettaM.GursoyU. K. (2016). Biobanks in oral health: Promises and implications of post-neoliberal science and innovation. OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology, 20, 36-41. doi:10.1089/omi.2015.0123
2.
DouthatR. (2016, October8). Among the post-liberals. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://nyti.ms/2dJauko
3.
EttlingerN.HartmannC. D. (2015). Post/neo/liberalism in relational perspective. Political Geography, 48, 37-48.
4.
HartmannC. D. (2016). Postneoliberal public health care reforms: Neoliberalism, social medicine, and persistent health inequalities in Latin America. American Journal of Public Health, 106, 2145-2151.
5.
HopeJ. (2015). The road to where? A political ecology of post-neoliberalism: Negotiations of extractive-led development, indigeneity and conservation in the Isiboro Secure Indigenous Territory and National Park (TIPNIS), Bolivia (Unpublished PhD thesis). The University of Manchester, UK.
LatherP. (2018). Within and beyond neoliberalism: Doing qualitative research in the afterward. In SpoonerM.McNinchJ. (Eds.), Dissident knowledge in higher education (pp. 102-120). Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada: University of Regina Press.
MalikS.PhillipsA. (2011). The wrong of contemporary art: Aesthetics and political indeterminacy. In BowmanP.StampR. (Eds.), Reading Ranciere (pp. 111-128). New York, NY: Continuum.
11.
MasonP. (2015). Postcapitalism: A guide to our future. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
