In this article, I think retrospectively with art and passages of writing produced in connection to a study on aesthetic activity and urban nature with two classes of fifth graders attending school in a city of the American Midwest. For this, I take on the art philosophy of Deleuze, Deleuze and Guattari and Deleuzian scholars to discuss how aesthetics and processes of art-making can inform empirical gestures based on distance from and invention of worlds. Art extracts sensations from chaotic forces that function in excess, variation, and proliferation, offering valuable practices to attune toward the affectivity of post-phenomenological life worlds.
ColebrookC. (2010). Expression. In ParrA. (Ed.), The Deleuze dictionary (Kindle DX version). Available from Amazon.com
5.
De FreitasL. (2017). New empiricism and the moving image: Rethinking video data in education research. In LungbergM. KoroLoytonenT.TesarM. (Eds.), Disrupting Data in Qualitative Inquiry: Entanglements with the Post-Critical and Post-Anthropocentric (pp. 211-224). New York: Peter Lang.
6.
DeleuzeG. (1986). Cinéma 1: The movement-image. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
7.
DeleuzeG. (1989). Cinéma 2: The time-image. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
8.
DeleuzeG. (2003). Francis Bacon: The logic of sensation. London, England: Continuum.
9.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
10.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1994). What is philosophy?New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
11.
DemosT. J. (2017). Against the anthropocene: Visual culture and environment today. Berlin, Germany: Sternberg Press.
12.
DuhnI.MaloneK.TesarM. (2017). Troubling the intersections of urban/nature/childhood in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 23, 1357-1368.
13.
GroszE. (2008). Chaos, territory, art: Deleuze and the framing of the earth. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
14.
HarawayD. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
15.
IngoldT. (2013). Making: Anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. New York, NY: Routledge.
16.
MacLureM. (2013). The wonder of data. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 13, 228-232.
17.
MaloneK. (2007). The bubble-wrap generation: Children growing up in walled gardens. Environmental Education Research, 13, 513-527.
18.
MaloneK. (2016). Reconsidering children’s encounters with nature and place using post-humanism. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 32, 42-56.
19.
ManningE. (2007). Politics of touch: Sense, movement, sovereignty. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
OlssonL. M. (2013). Taking children’s questions seriously: The need for creative thought. Global Studies of Childhood, 3, 230-252.
26.
O’SullivanD. (2016). Myth-science and the fictioning of reality. Paragrana, 25, 80-93.
27.
O’SullivanS. (2006). Art encounters Deleuze and Guattari: Thought beyond representation. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
28.
PyyryN. (2017). Thinking with broken glass: Making pedagogical spaces of enchantment in the city. Environmental Education Research, 23, 1391-1401.
29.
RautioP.HohtiR.LeinonenR.-M.TammiT. (2017). Reconfiguring urban environmental education with “shitgull” and a “shop.”Environmental Education Research, 23, 1379-1390.
30.
RousellD.Cutter-McKenzieA. (2019). Uncommon worlds: Towards an ecological aesthetics of childhood in the anthropocene. In Cutter-MackenzieA.MaloneK.Barratt HackingE. (Eds.), Research handbook on childhoodnature. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
31.
SauvagnarguesA. (2016). Art machines: Deleuze, Guattari, Simondon. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
32.
SpringgayS.TrumanS. (2018). On the need for methods beyond proceduralism: Speculative middles, (in)tensions, and response-ability in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 24, 203-214.
33.
StewartK. (2007). Ordinary affects. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
34.
TaylorA. (2013). Reconfiguring the natures of childhood. London, England: Routledge.
35.
TaylorA.BlaiseM. (2014). Queer worlding childhood. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35, 377-392.
36.
TaylorA.Pacini-KetchabawV. (2015). Learning with children, ants, and worms in the Anthropocene: Towards a common world pedagogy of multispecies vulnerability. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 23, 507-529.
37.
TaylorA.Pacini-KetchabawV. (2017). Kids, raccoons, and roos: Awkward encounters and mixed affects. Children’s Geographies, 15, 131-145.
38.
Trafi-PratsL. (2009). Destination Raval Sud: A visual ethnography on pedagogy, aesthetics, and the spatial experience of growing up urban. Studies in Art Education, 51, 6-20.
39.
Trafi-PratsL. (2012). Urban children as emancipated viewers: Narratives of self and place in the city of Milwaukee. Studies in Art Education, 53, 125-137.
40.
Trafi-PratsL. (2017a). Learning with children, trees, and art: For a compositionist visual art-based research. Studies in Art Education, 4, 325-334.
41.
Trafi-PratsL. (2017b). What do Walmart, grandma’s house, church, a motel or the school library have in common? Investigating video self-portraits of place with elementary children. In EmmeM.KirovaA. (Eds.), Good question: Art-based approaches to collaborative research with children and youth (pp. 179-193). Victoria, British Columbia: Canadian Society for Education through Art.
42.
TsingA. (2015). The mushroom at the end of the world: On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
