Qualitative inquiry in the public sphere is discussed with a study concerning intercultural palliative care. For the case of Russian-speaking immigrants in Germany, language problems in care are analyzed as an issue of organizational ethics. Interviews with this target group originally addressing barriers of access to professional care are reanalyzed for the roles of language, limited language skills, and the lack of professional translation in care. The focus is on ethical implications for organizing services and the health care system planned for organizational justice for all groups in a diversifying society. Findings are discussed with Burawoy’s concept of a public sociology.
BognerA.LittigB.MenzW. (2018). Generating qualitative data with experts and elites. In FlickU. (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data collection (pp. 652-665). London, England: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781526416070.n41
ConradiE. (2001). Take care: Grundlagen einer Ethik der Achtsamkeit[Take care: Basics of an ethics of mindfulness]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Campus Verlag.
4.
CortiL. (2018). Data collection in secondary analysis. In FlickU. (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data collection (pp. 164-181). London, England: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781526416070.n11
5.
DüwellM. (2005). Sozialwissenschaften, Gesellschaftstheorie und Ethik. Jahrbuch für Wissenschaft und Ethik [Social Sciences, Societal Theory and Ethics. Yearbook for Science and Ethics], 10, 5-22. doi:10.1515/9783110182521.5
6.
FlickU. (Ed.). (1998). The psychology of the social. Representations in knowledge and language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7.
FlickU. (2015). Qualitative inquiry—2.0 at 20? Developments, trends, and challenges for the politics of research. Qualitative Inquiry, 21, 599-608.
FlickU. (2018b). Doing triangulation and mixed methods. London, England: Sage.
10.
FlickU. (2018c). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). London, England: Sage.
11.
FlickU. (2020). Hearing and Being Heard, Seeing and Being Seen: Qualitative inquiry in the public sphere—Introduction to the special issue. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(2), 135-141.
12.
FlickU.RöhnschG. (2014). Migrating diseases: Triangulating approaches—Applying qualitative inquiry as a global wndeavor. Qualitative Inquiry, 20, 1096-1109. doi:10.1177/1077800414543694
13.
GrützmannT.RoseC.PetersT. (2012). Interkulturelle Kompetenz in der medizinischen Praxis. Ethik in der Medizin [Intercultural Competence in Medical Practice. Ethics in Medicine], 24, 323-334.
14.
HamburgerF. (2018). Edition Soziale Arbeit: Abschied von der Interkulturellen Pädagogik: Plädoyer für einen Wandel sozialpädagogischer Konzepte [Edition Social Work: Farewell to Intercultural Pedagogic: A Case for a Change in Social Education Concepts.] (3rd ed.). Weinheim, Germany: Beltz Juventa. Retrieved from http://www.content-select.com/index.php?id=bib_view&ean=9783779949466
15.
HolsteinJ. A.MillerG. (Eds.) (2003). Challenges & Choices. Constructionist Perspectives on Social Problems. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
16.
HusebøS. (2009). Kommunikation. In HusebøS.KlaschickE. (Eds.), Palliativmedizin: Grundlagen und Praxis. Schmerztherapie, Gesprächsführung, Ethik [Palliative Medicine: Basics and Practice. Pain Therapy, Counselling Techniques, Ethics] (5th ed., pp. 147-205). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
17.
KappaufH. W. (2004). Kommunikation in der Onkologie [Communication in oncology]. Der Hautarzt. Zeitschrift für Dermatologie, Venerologie und verwandte Gebiete, 55, 709-714. doi:10.1007/s00105-004-0767-7
MigalaS.FlickU. (2018). Individual needs, cultural barriers, public discourses: Taking qualitative inquiry into the public sphere. In DenzinN. K.GiardinaM. D. (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry in the public sphere (pp. 90-107). New York, NY: Routledge.
20.
MigalaS.FlickU. (2019). Cultural and individual barriers to palliative care from different angles: Data triangulation in practice. Qualitative Inquiry, 25, 786-798. doi:10.1177/1077800418809475
21.
MurrayM. (2014). Implementation: Putting Analyses into Practice. In FlickU. (ed.) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis. (pp. 585-599). London, England: Sage.
22.
Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften Leopoldina & Union der deutschen Akademien der Wissenschaften. (2015). Palliativversorgung in Deutschland: Perspektiven für Praxis und Forschung (Stellungnahme) [Palliative Care in Germany: Perspectives for Practice and Research]. Halle (Saale), Germany: Schriftenreihe zur wissenschaftsbasierten Politikberatung.
23.
PeintingerM. (2011). Lebensqualität als Element partnerschaftlicher Entscheidungen. In PeintingerM. (Ed.), Interkulturell kompetent: Ein Handbuch für Ärztinnen und Ärzte [Interclturally Competent: A Handbook for Physcians] (pp. 145-158). Wien, Austria: Facultas.
24.
RadbruchL.PayneS. (2010). White paper on standards and norms for hospice and palliative care in Europe: Part 1: Recommendations from the European Association for palliative care. European Journal of Palliative Care, 17, 22-33.
25.
RauA.EllikerF.CoetzeeJ. K. (2018). Collecting data for analyzing discourses. In FlickU. (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data collection (pp. 300-313). London, England: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781526416070.n19
26.
SallochS.RitterP.WäscherS.VollmannJ.SchildmannJ. (2016). Was ist ein ethisches Problem und wie finde ich es? Theoretische, methodologische und forschungspraktische Fragen der Identifikation ethischer Probleme am Beispiel einer empirisch-ethischen Interventionsstudie [What is an Ethical Problem and how Do I Find it? Theoretical, Methodological and Research Practical Questions of identifying Ethical Problems for the Example of an Empirical-ethical Intervention Study]. Ethik in der Medizin, 28, 267-281. doi:10.1007/s00481-016-0384-x
27.
SandelowskiM.LeemanJ. (2012). Writing usable qualitative health research findings. Qualitative Health Research, 22, 1404-1413. doi:10.1177/1049732312450368
StudentJ.-C.MühlumA.StudentU. (2007). Soziale Arbeit in Hospiz und palliative care [Social Work in Hospices and Palliative Car] (2 überarb. Aufl., Vol. 2547). Uni-Taschenbücher. Retrieved from http://www.utb-studi-e-book.de/9783838525471
31.
VogelC. (2012). Generationenbeziehungen der (Spät-)Aussiedler: Forschungsstand und exemplarische Befunde zu Einstellungen. In Baykara-KrummeH.SchimanyP.Motel-KlingebielA. (Eds.), Alter(n) und Gesellschaft: Band 22. Viele Welten des Alterns: Ältere Migranten im alternden Deutschland [Age/ing and Society, 22 Many Worlds of Ageing: Senior Migrants in an Ageing Germany] (pp. 289-313). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
32.
WästerforsD.ÅkerströmM.JacobssonK. (2014). Reanalysis of qualitative data. In FlickU. (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 467-480). London, England: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781446282243.n32
33.
WehkampK.-H. (2014). Interkulturalität im Gesundheitswesen: Organsiationsethische Aspekte. In CoorsM.GrutzmannT.PeterT. (Eds.), Edition Ethik: Band 13. Interkulturalität und Ethik: Der Umgang mit Fremdheit in Medizin und Pflege [Edition Ethics: Vol. 13, Interculturality and Ethics: Dealing with Otherness in Medicine and Care] (pp. 81-88). Göttingen, Germany: Ruprecht.
34.
WennerJ.RazumO. (2016). Ethische Fragen der Migrantinnen- und Migrantengesundheit. In Schröder-BäckP.KuhnJ. (Eds.), Grundlagentexte Gesundheitswissenschaften. Ethik in den Gesundheitswissenschaften: Eine Einführung [Basic Texts Health Sciences: Ethics in Health Sciences: An Introduction] (1st ed., pp. 182-191). Weinheim, Germany: Beltz Juventa.
35.
WilligC. (2014). Discourses and discourse analysis. In FlickU. (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 341-353). London, England: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781446282243.n23
