This article acts as a reflexive account of my experience of doing qualitative research with d/Deaf people in a prison setting. This research was the first in England and Wales (excluding small-scale unpublished undergraduate dissertations) to include semi-structured interviews with multiple d/Deaf prisoners, and thus the journey documented is both innovative and unique. Because I was entering unmarked territory methodologically, my experience was laden with obstacles, as is discussed throughout. Key issues explored relate first to the process of gaining access to d/Deaf prisoners, second to researcher–participant language barriers, and third to issues of ethics and authenticity generated by the Deaf participants’ preference for a visual language (British Sign Language) in a setting like prison. Guidance is given throughout about how to overcome complex methodological issues, and concluding remarks include a set of recommendations for prospective researchers.
AlmalikM.KigerA.TuckerJ. (2010). “What did she say? What did she say?” The impact of interpretation on recruiting and interviewing European migrant women in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 9, 252-269.
3.
AthertonM.RussellD.TurnerG. H. (2001). Looking to the past: The role of oral history research in recording the visual history of Britain’s Deaf community. Oral History, 29(2), 35-47.
CrawleyE. (2004). Doing prison work: The public and private lives of prison officers. Cullompton, UK: Willan.
8.
CreweB. (2009). The prisoner society: Power, adaptation and social life in an English prison. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.
CreweB. (2011). Depth, weight, tightness: Revisiting the pains of imprisonment. Punishment & Society, 13, 509-529.
10.
CreweB. (2014). Not looking hard enough: Masculinity, emotion, and prison research. Qualitative Inquiry, 20, 426-437.
11.
CreweB.IevinsA. (2015). Closeness, distance and honesty in prison ethnography. In DrakeD.EarleR.SloanJ. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of prison ethnography (pp. 124-142). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
12.
DaviesP. (2011). Doing interviews in prison. In DaviesP.FrancisP.JuppV. (Eds.), Doing criminological research (2nd ed., pp. 161-178). London, England: Sage.
13.
DrakeD. (2012). Prisons, punishment and the pursuit of security. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
14.
DrakeD.HarveyH. (2014). Performing the role of ethnographer: Processing and managing the emotional dimensions of prison research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 17, 489-501.
15.
EarleR. (2014). Insider and out: Making sense of a prison experience and a research experience. Qualitative Inquiry, 20, 429-438.
16.
EmeryF. E. (1970). Freedom and justice within walls: The Bristol prison experiment. London, England: Tavistock.
17.
GelsthorpeL. (1990). Feminist methodologies in criminology: A new approach or old wine in new bottles? In GelsthorpeL.MorrisA. (Eds.), Feminist perspectives in criminology (pp. 89-106). Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
18.
GendersE.PlayerE. (1995). Grendon: A study of a therapeutic prison. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
19.
HammersleyM. (2015). Research “inside” viewed from “outside”: Reflections on prison ethnography. In DrakeD.EarleR.SloanJ. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of prison ethnography (pp. 21-39). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
20.
HarrisJ. (2010). Boiled eggs and baked beans—A personal account of a hearing researcher’s journey through Deaf culture. Disability & Society, 10, 295-308.
21.
HarringtonF.TurnerG. (2001). Interpreting: Studies and reflections on sign language interpreting. Coleford, UK: Douglas Mclean.
22.
HigginsP. (1980). Outsiders in a hearing world: A sociology of deafness. London, England: Sage.
23.
IngvarsdotterK.JohnsdotterS.OstmanM. (2010). Lost in interpretation: The use of interpreters in research on mental ill health. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 58, 34-40.
JewkesY. (2012). Autoethnography and emotion as intellectual resources: Doing prison research differently. Qualitative Inquiry, 18, 63-75.
26.
JewkesY. (2014). An introduction to “doing prison research differently.”Qualitative Inquiry, 20, 387-391.
27.
KellyL. (2017). Suffering in silence: The unmet needs of d/Deaf prisoners. Prison Service Journal, November, 234, 3-15.
28.
KellyL. (2018). Sounding out d/Deafness: The experiences of d/Deaf prisoners. Journal of Criminal Psychology, 8, 20-32.
29.
KingR. D.ElliottK. (1977). Albany: Birth of a prison. London, England: Routledge.
30.
KingR. D.LieblingA. (2008). Doing research in prisons. In KingR. D.WincupE. (Eds.), Doing research on crime and justice (2nd ed., pp. 431-451). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
31.
KingR. D.McDermottK. (1995). The state of our prisons. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
32.
LeighI. W. (2009). A Lens on Deaf Identities. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
33.
LieblingA. (1999). Doing research in prison: Breaking the silence?Theoretical Criminology, 3, 147-172.
34.
LieblingA. (2001). Whose side are we on? Theory, practice and allegiances in prison research. British Journal of Criminology, 41, 472-484.
35.
MarscharkM. (1993). Origins and interactions in language, cognitive and social development in deaf children. In MarscharkM.ClarkeM. D. (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on deafness (pp. 7-26). Hillsdale, MI: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36.
MartinC. (2000). Doing research in a prison setting. In JuppV.DaviesO.FrancisP. (Eds.), Doing criminological research (pp. 215-233). London, England: Sage.
MatthewsB.RossL. (2010). Research methods: A practical guide for the social sciences. Harlow, UK: Longman.
39.
MayT. (2001). Social research: Issues, methods and process (3rd ed.). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
40.
McCullochD. (2010). Not hearing us? A critical exploration of the current experiences of profoundly deaf prisoners in Anglo Welsh prisons (Unpublished dissertation). Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK.
41.
McCullochD. (2012). Not Hearing Us: An exploration of the experience of deaf prisoners in English and Welsh prisons (A report for the Howard league for penal reform). London, England: The Howard League for Penal Reform.
MurrayC. D.WynneJ. (2001). Using an interpreter to research community, work and family. Community, Work & Family, 4, 157-170.
46.
National Registers of Communication Professionals working with Deaf and Deaf blind People. (n.d.-a). About us. Retrieved from http://www.nrcpd.org.uk/index.php
47.
National Registers of Communication Professionals working with Deaf and Deaf blind People. (n.d.-b). Code of conduct. Retrieved from http://www.nrcpd.org.uk/code-of-conduct
48.
PaddenC. (1980). The deaf community and the culture of deaf people. In BakerC.BattisonR. (Eds.), Sign language and the deaf community: Essays in honor of William C. Stokoe (pp. 89-104). Silver Spring, MD: National Association of the Deaf.
49.
PhillipsC. (2012). The Multicultural Prison: Ethnicity, Masculinity, and Social Relations among Prisoners. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
50.
PiacentiniL. (2015). ‘Get in, get out, go back?’: Transitioning from prison ethnography to prison policy research in russia. In DrakeD.EarleR.SloanJ. (Eds.), The palgrave handbook of prison ethnography. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
51.
ReussA. (2000). The researcher’s tale. In WilsonD.ReussA. (Eds.), Prison(er) education: Stories of change and transformation (pp. 24-47). Hook, UK: Waterside Press.
52.
RoweA. (2014). Situating the self in prison research: Power, identity and epistemology. Qualitative Inquiry, 20:, 404-416.
53.
RoyC. B. (1992). A sociolinguistic analysis of the interpreter’s role in simultaneous talk in a face-to-face interpreted dialogue. Sign Language Studies, 74, 21-61.
54.
SchlosserJ. A. (2008). Issues in interviewing inmates: Navigating the methodological landmines of prison research. Qualitative Inquiry, 14, 1500-1525.
55.
ScottD. (1996). Heavenly confinement? The prison chaplain in North East England’s prisons. London, England: Lambert Press.
56.
ScottD. (2006). Ghosts beyond our realm: A neo-abolitionist analysis of prisoner human rights and prison officer culture. Preston, UK: University of Central Lancashire.
57.
ScottD. (2015a). Critical research values and the sociological imagination: Lessons from researching prison officers. In FrauleyJ. (Ed.), C. Wright Mills and the criminological imagination (pp. 185-199). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
58.
ScottD. (2015b). Walking amongst the graves of the living: Reflections about doing prison research from an abolitionist perspective. In DrakeD.EarleR.SloanJ. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of prison ethnography (pp. 40-58). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
59.
SloanJ.DrakeD. (2013). Emotional engagements: On sinking and swimming in prison research and ethnography. Criminal Justice Matters, 91(1), 24-25.
60.
SloanJ.WrightS. (2015). Going in green: Reflections on the challenges of “getting in, getting on, and getting out” for doctoral prisons researchers. In DrakeD.EarleR.SloanJ. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of prison ethnography (pp. 143-168). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
61.
SparksR.BottomsA.HayW. (1996). Prisons and the problem of order. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
62.
StevensA. (2013). Offender rehabilitation and therapeutic communities: Instituting change “the TC way.” New York, NY: Routledge.
63.
StoneC.WestD. (2012). Translation, representation and the Deaf “voice.”Qualitative Research, 12, 645-665.
64.
SutherlandH.YoungA. (2014). Research with deaf children and not on them: A study of method and process. Children & Society, 28, 366-379.
65.
WadensjöC. (1998). Interpreting as interaction. London, England: Longman.
66.
WilsonA. T.WiniarczykR. E. (2014). Mixed methods research strategies with Deaf people: Linguistic and cultural challenges addressed. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 8, 266-277.
WincupE.HucklesbyA. (2007). Researching and evaluating resettlement. In HucklesbyA.Hagley-DickinsonL. (Eds.), Prisoner resettlement: Policy and practice (pp. 67-94). Cullompton, UK: Willan.
69.
YoungA.HuntR. (2011). Research with d/Deaf people: Methods review9. London, England: National Institute for Health Research.
