At the heart of this article are the stories of a woman who identifies herself as a “homegrown,” Mexican American teacher. It is through storytelling with this teacher, Ms. Luna Martinez, that we come to understand how race, class, gender, ethnicity, and motherhood cross borders from the home to the classroom and back again. Although this article focuses on the life story of one teacher, it should be noted that her story resides within a larger research context. Ms. Luna Martinez’s story works to counter deficit, majoritarian narratives that inflict harm on Communities of Color. Moreover, her story radiates moments of survival and resilience with the potential to uplift and inspire Communities of Color. As a “homegrown” teacher who embodies a “pedagogies of the home” approach in the classroom, Ms. Luna Martinez connects with students through a familial and communal kinship.
AnzaldúaG. (1990). Making face, making soul/haciendo Caras: Creative and critical perspectives by feminists of color. San Francisco, CA: Aunt Lute Books
2.
BartonD.HamiltonM. (2000). Literacy practices. In BartonD.HamiltonM.IvanicR. (Eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context (pp. 7-15). London, England: Routledge.
3.
CalderónD.Delgado BernalD.Pérez HuberL.MalagónM.VélezV. N. (2012). A Chicana feminist epistemology revisited: Cultivating ideas a generation later. Harvard Educational Review, 82, 513-539.
4.
Delgado BernalD. (1997). Chicana school resistance and grassroots leadership: Providing an alternative history of the 1948 East Los Angeles blowouts (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles.
5.
Delgado BernalD. (1998a). Using Chicana feminist epistemology in educational research. Harvard Educational Review, 68, 555-582.
6.
Delgado BernalD. (1998b). Grassroots leadership reconceptualized: Chicana oral history and the 1968 East Los Angeles school blowouts. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 19, 113-142.
7.
Delgado BernalD. (2001). Learning and living pedagogies of the home: The mestiza consciousness of Chicana students. Qualitative Studies in Education, 14, 623-639.
8.
Delgado BernalD. (2002). Critical race theory, Latino critical theory, and critical raced-gendered epistemologies: Recognizing students of color as holders and creators of knowledge. Qualitative Inquiry, 8, 105-126.
9.
Diaz SotoL.Cervantes-SoonC. G.VillarealE.CamposE. E. (2009). The Xicana sacred space: A communal circle of compromiso for educational researchers. Harvard Educational Review, 79, 755-776.
10.
Duncan-AndradeJ. M. R. (2005). Developing social justice educators. Educational Leadership, 62(6), 70-73.
11.
Duncan-AndradeJ. M. R. (2009). Note to educators: Hope required when growing roses in concrete. Harvard Educational Review, 79, 181-194.
12.
FosterM. (1993). Othermothers: Exploring the educational philosophy of Black American women teachers. In ArnotM.WeilerK. (Eds.), Feminism and social justice in education: International perspectives (pp. 101-123). Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
GirouxH. (1988). Teachers as intellectuals: Toward a critical pedagogy of learning. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
15.
GutiérrezK. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43, 148-164.
16.
HardingS. (1989). Feminism and methodology: Social science issues. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
17.
HarrisC. I. (1993). Whiteness as property. Harvard Law Review, 106, 1707-1791.
18.
IrizarryJ. G. (2007). “Home-growing” teachers of color: Lessons learned from a town-gown partnership. Teacher Education Quarterly, 34(4), 87-102.
19.
JohnsonK. (1998). Immigration and Latino identity. Chicano-Latino Law Review, 19, 197-212.
20.
LanfordM.TierneyW. G.LincolnY. (2018). The art of life history: novel approaches, future directions. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(5), 459-463.
21.
Lawrence-LightfootS.Hoffmann DavisJ. (1997). The art and science of portraiture. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
22.
MartinezG. A. (1997). The legal construction of race: Mexican-Americans and whiteness. Harvard Latino Law Review, 2, 321-347.
23.
MenchacaM. (2001). Recovering history, constructing race: The Indian, Black, and White roots of Mexican Americans. Austin: University of Texas Press.
24.
MollL. C.AmantiC.NeffD.GonzalezN. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31, 132-141.
25.
MontoyaM. (1994). Mascaras, trenzas, y grenas [Masks, braids, & tangles]: Un/masking the self while un/braiding Latina stories and legal discourse. Chicano-Latino Law Review, 15, 1-37.
26.
Pérez HuberL. (2009). Challenging racist nativist framing: Acknowledging the community cultural wealth of undocumented Chicana college students to reframe the immigration debate. Harvard Educational Review, 79, 704-729.
27.
PierceC.CarewJ.Pierce-GonzalezD.WillsD. (1978). An experiment in racism: TV commercials. In PierceC. (Ed.), Television and education (pp. 62-88). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
28.
RochaJ.AlonsoJ.Mares-Lopez-TamayoM.Reyes McGovernE. (2016). Beyond theoretical sensitivity: The benefits of cultural intuition within qualitative research and freirean generative themes: Four unique research perspectives. The Qualitative Report, 21, 744-764.
29.
ScheurichJ. J.YoungM. D. (1997). Coloring epistemologies: Are our epistemologies racially biased?Educational Researcher, 26(4), 4-16.
30.
SilkoL. M. (1977). Ceremony. New York, NY: Viking.
31.
SpivakG. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In NelsonC.GrossbergL. (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 610-614). Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
32.
Trucios-HaynesE. (2002). Why race matters: LatCrit theory and Latina/o racial identity. Berkeley La Raza Law Review, 12(1), 1-42.
