Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Academics are often criticized for their poor or rotten writing. In this essay, I look first at several ways in which academic writing may be regarded as, for example, obscure and turgid. Second, I discuss reasons why, despite such criticism, academics persevere with their writing. Third, I outline a number of approaches to the how of academic writing as a daily practice. Finally, I present my playful yet serious efforts to confront the hows and whys of academic (and post-academic) writing as an important human and social practice.

Keywords

academic bullshit being playful and serious writing as an act of hope

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allende

(1993). Writing as an act of hope. Retrieved from https://www.lcps.org/cms/lib4/VA1000195/Centricity/Domain/10716/Allende_Writing (Accessed 25 October 2018)

Atwood

(2002). Negotiating with the dead: A writer on writing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Badley

(2009). Academic writing: Contested knowledge in the making. Quality Assurance in Education, 17, 104-107.

Badley

(2011). Academic scribbling: A frivolous approach. Teaching in Higher Education, 16, 255-266.

Badley

(2014). Hunting roaches: A sort of academic life. Qualitative Inquiry, 20, 981-989.

Badley

(2015). Conversation piece? Qualitative Inquiry, 21, 418-425.

Badley

(2016). Blue-collar writing for fruitful dialogue. Qualitative Inquiry, 22, 510-517.

Badley

(2019). Post-academic writing: Human writing for human readers. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(2), 180-191. doi:10.1177/1077800417736334

Barnett

Bengtsen

(Eds.). (2018). The thinking university. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

10.

Benozzo

Carey

Cozza

Elmenhorst

Fairchild

Koro-Ljungberg

Taylor

(2019). Disturbing the AcademicConferenceMachine: Post-qualitative re-turnings. Gender, Work & Organization, 26(2), 87-106. doi:10.1111/gwao.12260

11.

Billig

(2013). Learn to write badly: How to succeed in the social sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

12.

Blanshard

(1954). On philosophical style. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

13.

Bourdieu

Passeron

J.-C.

de Saint Martin

(1996). Academic discourse. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

14.

Brandom

(1994). Making it explicit—Reasoning, representing, and discursive commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

15.

Churchwell

(2018, May 26). The man who wrote America. The Guardian, pp. 7-11.

16.

Cloutier

(2016). How I write: An inquiry into the writing practices of academics. Journal of Management Theory, 25, 69-84.

17.

Dennett

(2013). Intuition pumps and other tools for thinking. London, England: Allen Lane.

18.

Denzin

(2014). Interpretive autoethnography (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

19.

Derrida

(1976). Of grammatology ( Spivak

, Trans.). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

20.

Dewey

(1991). How we think. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books. (Original work published 1910)

21.

Dewsbury

J.-D.

(2014). Inscribing thoughts: The animation of an adventure. Cultural Geographies in Practice, 21, 147-152.

22.

Didion

(1976, December 5). Why I write. The New York Times Book Review. Retrieved from https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/schools/whitmanhs/academics/english/Why%20I%20Write%20Didion.pdf

23.

Elkins

(2013). Why I write. Journal of Legal Education, 63, 333-340.

24.

Essen

Varlender

(2013). The mutual constitution of sensuous and discursive understanding in scientific practice: An autoethnographic lens on academic writing. Management Learning, 44, 395-423.

25.

Eubanks

Schaeffer

(2008). A kind word for bullshit: The problem of academic writing. College Composition and Communication, 59, 372-388. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20457010

26.

Fairclough

(2012). Political discourse analysis: A method for advanced students. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

27.

Fairclough

(2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London, England: Routledge.

28.

Ferrante

(2018, April 21). God didn’t make a good impression on my teenage self. The Guardian, p. 70.

29.

Frankl

(1992). Man’s search for meaning: An introduction to logotherapy. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

30.

Fresán

(2017). The invented part. Rochester, NY: Open Letter, University of Rochester Press.

31.

Ghodsee

(2016). From notes to narrative: Writing ethnographies that everyone can read. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

32.

Henderson

Honan

Loch

(2016). The production of the academicwritingmachine. Reconceptualizing Education Research Methodology, 7(2), 4-18.

33.

Higgins

(2018, April 14). Cover story: Interview with Carlo Rovelli. The Guardian, pp. 6-11.

34.

Karavanta

Morgan

(Eds.). (2008). Edward Said and Jacques Derrida: Reconstellating humanism and the global hybrid. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

35.

Kincheloe

Berry

(2004). Rigour and complexity in educational research: Conceptualizing the bricolage. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.

36.

McCrum

(2011, December 18). Fifty things I’ve learned about the literary life. The New Review, The Observer, p. 39.

37.

Mullan

(2018, April 7). [Review of Shakespeare’s originality, by J. Kerrigan, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK]. The Guardian, p. 15.

38.

Oakeshott

(1962). Rationalism in politics. New York, NY: Basic Books.

39.

Orwell

(2004). Why I write. London, UK: Penguin Books. (Original work published 1946)

40.

O’Toole

(2018, May 30). If only Brexit had been run like Ireland’s referendum. The Guardian, pp. 1-2.

41.

Palumbo

(2000). Writing from the inside out. New York, NY: John Wiley.

42.

Pinker

(2014, September 26). Why academics stink at writing. The Chronicle Review, The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from https://stevenpinker.com/files/pinker/files/why_academics_stink_at_writing.pdf

43.

Rhodes

(1995). How to write: Advice and reflections. New York, NY: William Morrow.

44.

Richardson

(2002). Skirting a pleated text: De-disciplining and academic life. In Denzin

Lincoln

(Eds.), The qualitative inquiry reader (pp. 39-51). London, England: Sage.

45.

Rorty

(1998). Truth and progress: Philosophical papers (Vol. 3). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.

46.

Rorty

(1999). Philosophy and social hope. London, England: Penguin Books.

47.

Rorty

(2007). Philosophy as cultural politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

48.

Roth

(1999). I married a communist. London, England: Vintage.

49.

Russell

(n.d.). How I write, Bertrand Russell. Retrieved from http://www.pereestupinya.com/pdf/Russell,_Bertrand-How_I_Write.pdf

50.

Silvia

(2007). How to write a lot: A practical guide to productive academic writing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

51.

St Pierre

. (2019). Post qualitative inquiry in an ontology of immanence. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(1), 3-16. doi:1177/10778004/18772634

52.

Strunk

White

(2009). The elements of style. New York, NY: Pearson Longman. (Original work published 1959)

53.

Swift

(1983). Waterland. London, England: Heinemann.

54.

Sword

(2012). Stylish academic writing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

55.

van Manen

. (2018). Serendipitous insights and Kairos playfulness. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(9), 672-680. doi:10.1177/1077800418778714

56.

Varoufakis

(2018a). Introduction to the Communist Manifesto. London, England: Vintage Classics.

57.

Varoufakis

(2018b, April 20). A manifesto for right now. The Guardian, pp. 9-11.

58.

Winter

Badley

(2007). Action research and academic writing: A conversation. Educational Action Research, 15, 253-270.

59.

Wolff

(2018, April 10). Our bullied universities should be speaking truth to power. The Guardian, p. 36.

60.

Yoo

(2017). Writing out on a limb: Integrating the creative and academic writing identity. New Writing, 14, 444-454. doi:10.1080/14790726.2017.1317274

61.

Zinsser

(2006). On writing well. New York, NY: HarperCollins.

Why and How Academics Write

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References