In this article, I trace the ways in which my doctoral thesis methodology became a “pedagogy of vulnerability.” Using two “stop moments,” I describe the emergent “openings” that not only helped shape and shift the direction of my research, but also allowed me to be shaped by it. In being willing to labor, risk, and learn in and through the methodological choices made and especially with/in/from the borderlands, I demonstrate how one might think, work through, and play with the many possibilities that could interrupt the normative ways of “doing” research.
AnzaldúaG. (1987). Borderlands/La frontera: The new mestiza. San Francisco, CA: Aunt Lute Books.
2.
AnzaldúaG. (2003). Speaking across the divide: An email interview. SAIL: Studies in American Indian Literatures, 15(3-4), 7-21.
3.
AnzaldúaG. (2009). Creativity and switching modes of consciousness. In KeatingA. (Ed.), The Gloria Anzaldúa reader (pp. 103-110). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
4.
AnzaldúaG. E. (2015a). Flights of the imagination: Rereading/rewriitng realities. In KeatingA. (Ed.), Light in the dark Luz en lo oscuro: Rewriting identity, spirituality, reality (pp. 23-46). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
5.
AnzaldúaG. E. (2015b). Preface: Gestures of the body—Escribiendo para idear. In KeatingA. (Ed.), Light in the dark/Luz en lo oscuro: Rewriting identity, spirituality, reality (pp. 1-8). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
6.
AppelbaumD. (1995). The stop. Albany: State University of New York Press.
7.
BhattacharyaK. (2009). Othering research, researching the other: De/colonizing approaches to qualitative inquiry. In SmartJ. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. XXIV, pp. 105-150). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
8.
BhattacharyaK. (2015). The vulnerable academic: Personal narratives and strategic de/colonizing of academic structures. Qualitative Inquiry, 22, 309-321.
9.
BhattacharyaK. (2017). Walking through the dark forest: Embodied literacies for shadow work in higher education and beyond. Journal of Black Sexuality and Relationships, 4, 105-124.
10.
BrantmeierE. J. (2013). Pedagogy of vulnerability: Definitions, assumptions, and applications. In LinJ.OxfordR.BrantmeierE. J. (Eds.), Re-envisioning higher education: Embodied pathways to wisdom and transformation (pp. 95-106). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
11.
CollinsP. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.
12.
FelsL. (2012). Collecting data through performative inquiry: A tug on the sleeve. Youth Theatre Journal, 26, 50-60.
13.
FelsL. (2015). Performative inquiry: Reflection as a scholarly pedagogical act. In VettrainoE.LindsW. (Eds.), Playing in a house of mirrors: Applied theatre as reflective practice (pp. 151-174). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
14.
FreireP. (1996). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum. (Original work published in 1970)
15.
GallagherK. (2014). Why theatre matters: Urban youth, engagement, and a pedagogy of the real. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
GreeneM. (1978). Landscapes of learning. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
18.
OrtegaM. (2016). In-between: Latina feminist phenomenology, multiplicity, and the self. Albany: State University of New York Press.
19.
RazackS. (1993). Storytelling for social change. Gender and Education, 5(1), 55 -70.
20.
RochaZ. L. (2011). Gendering mixed-race, deconstructing mixedness. In SimsJ. (Ed.), Mixed heritage: Identity, policy, and practice (pp. 7-9). London, England: Runnymede Trust.
21.
SmithL. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples (2nd ed.). London, England: Zed Books. (Original work published 1999)
22.
SpringgayS.FreedmanD. (2008). Introduction: On touching and a bodied curriculum. In SpringgayS.FreedmanD. (Eds.), Curriculum and the cultural body (pp. xvii-xxvii). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
