This article, autoethnography, my story or, preferably, reflective essay, relies on two metaphors. The first focuses on the university as an academic funhouse, a place of dialogue and ideas, espousing freedoms to learn, play, read, research, speak, teach, and even to offend. However, the notion of an academic funhouse in age of managerialism and neoliberalism is now difficult to sustain. The second metaphor is that of a global playhouse where post-academics may continue to pursue old interests and develop new ones. However, as all performers and writers and others contributing to the work and pleasures of the playhouse are fully aware, an end-stage is inevitable.
AitkenheadD. (2017, May27). The long game. Guardian Weekend, pp. 18-27.
2.
AppignanesiL. (Ed.). (2005). Free expression is no offence. London, England: Penguin Books.
3.
ArchibugiD.CelliniM. (2017, February19). A cure for the populist infection? A bigger dose of democracy!Global Dynamics. Retrieved from https://www.opendemocracy.net
4.
BadleyG. (1996). Educational development in the managerial university. Journal of Education Through Partnership, 1(1), 53-69.
5.
BadleyG. (2009). “A place from where to speak”: The university and academic freedom. British Journal of Educational Studies, 57, 146-163.
6.
BadleyG. (2013). Lost in the funhouse. Qualitative Inquiry, 19, 310-319.
7.
BadleyG. (2015). Playful and serious adventures in academic writing. Qualitative Inquiry, 23, 711-719.
8.
BadleyG. (2019). Post-academic writing: Human writing for human readers. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(2), 180-191. doi:10.1177/1077800417736334
9.
BeckettA. (2018, January19). Post-work: The radical idea of a world without jobs. The Guardian, pp. 9-11.
BensonL.HarkavyI.PuckettJ. (2007). Dewey’s dream—Universities and democracies in an age of education reform. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
12.
BochnerA. (2018). The night of and the mourning after: Truth and transference in the election of Donald Trump. Qualitative Inquiry, 24, 309-317. doi:10.1177/1077800417745428
13.
ButlerJ. (2002). What is critique? An essay on Foucault’s virtue. In IngramD. (Ed.), The political: Readings in continental philosophy (pp. 212-226). London, England: Basil Blackwell.
14.
CalhounC. (2013, April11). The problematic public: Revisiting Dewey, Arendt, and Habermas. In The Tanner lectures on human values (pp. 67-107). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
15.
CeiselC.SalvoJ. (2018). Autoethnographic responses to the political. Qualitative Inquiry, 24, 307-308. doi:10.1177/1077800417741985
16.
d’AnconaM. (2018, January22). Without the freedom to offend, progress is impossible. The Guardian, p. 4.
17.
DenicoloP. (Ed.). (2013). Achieving impact in research. London, England: SAGE.
DeweyJ. (1991). How we think. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books. (Original work published 1910)
20.
EriksonE. (1950). Childhood and society. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
21.
FoxS.JohnstonR. (2017). Well-intentioned fantasy? A comment on “proposals for a democracy of the future” by Bruno Frey. Homo Oeconomicus, 34, 229-235. doi:10.1007/s41412-017-0048-1
22.
FrancisconiM. (2008). Political sociology and anthropology in education: A manifesto for subversive education. New Proposals: Journal of Marxism and Interdisciplinary Inquiry, 1(2), 5-8.
23.
GarrisonJ. (1996). A Deweyan theory of democratic listening. Education Theory, 46, 429-451.
24.
GeertzC. (2000). Available light: Anthropological reflections on philosophical topics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
GirouxH. (2006). Higher education under siege: Implications for public intellectuals. Thought & Action, 63-78.
27.
GrayJ.KontosP. (2018). An aesthetic of relationality: Embodiment, imagination, and the necessity of playing the fool in research-informed theatre. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(7), 440-542. doi:10.1177/1077800417736331
28.
HareD. (2017, December, 30). Such stuff as dreams are made on. The Guardian.
29.
HytnerN. (2005). In AppignanesiL. (Ed.), No limits: The business of theatre (pp. 39-43). London, England: Penguin Books.
30.
JacobsonH. (2005). In AppignanesiL. (Ed.), Art and anathema (pp. 78-85). London, England: Penguin Books.
31.
JenkinsS. (2017, December14). Universities are bastions of privilege. That has to change. The Guardian, p. 19.
MacfarlaneL. (2017). 33 theses for an economics reformation—New thinking for the British economy. London, England: Open Democracy.
34.
McCrumR. (2017, August13). Words are the best weapons with which to come to terms with ageing. The Guardian, pp. 8-11.
35.
MyersonG. (1997). A new university space: A dialogue on argument, democracy and the university. In BarnettR.GriffinS. (Eds.), The end of knowledge in higher education (pp. 139-150). London, England: Cassell.
36.
OakeshottM. (1991). Rationalism in politics and other essays. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.
37.
OkriB. (2018, January31). At last, the cure for populism: We need active citizenship. The Guardian, pp. 1-2.
38.
PearsonR. (2005). Voltaire almighty: A life in pursuit of freedom. London, England: Bloomsbury.
39.
PeliasR. (2016). The end of an academic career: The desperate attempt to hang on and let go. Qualitative Inquiry, 22, 25-29.
40.
PerryG. (2017, May27). Popular is not a dirty word. The Guardian, pp. 14-15.
41.
RankinI. (2017, October14). A review of Henning Mankell’s “after the fire,” London: Harvill Secker. The Guardian, p. 9.
42.
RodrikD. (2017, November14). The fatal flaw of neoliberalism. The Guardian, pp. 27-29.
43.
RogersM. (2014). Introduction: Revisiting “the public and its problems.”Contemporary Pragmatism, 30(2), 1-3.
44.
RothP. (1988). The counterlife. London, England: Penguin.
SandelM. (2012). What money can’t buy: The moral limits of markets. London, England: Macmillan.
47.
SchwartzT. (2018, January, 18). Fear now rules Trump’s US. It’s what drives the president too. The Guardian, pp. 1-2.
48.
ShumarW. (1997). College for sale: A critique of the commodification of higher education. London, England: Falmer Press.
49.
UpdikeJ. (1989). Nothing to declare: Self-consciousness memoirs. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
50.
Van CleaveJ. (2018). Engaging uselessness: Philosophical reading and dwelling in the excess. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(9), 681-686. doi:10.1177/1077800417732092
