Sexual attraction and desire in the field have long been taboo subjects, where the researcher is expected to remain an objective observer, devoid of sexuality. Recently, scholars have advocated for the acknowledgment of sexual attraction and desire in the field as a way to think reflexively about the research process and subsequent impacts, known in anthropology as “erotic subjectivity.” This article reflects on the ethical dilemma of the female feminist researcher doing ethnographic fieldwork in such a space where sexual performativity and active desiring is demanded of them by the research subjects themselves. Based on an ethnographic account of professional men’s strip-tease show, this article details the dilemmas concerning the need to remain objective and distanced from such acts as a researcher, the feminist discomfiture in the blatant objectification and sexualization, both physically and visually of men, and the expectation to publicly perform sexuality by peers and research subjects alike.
AllenJ. (2012). One way or another: Erotic subjectivity in Cuba. American Ethnologist, 39, 325-338.
2.
AshkenaziM.MarkowitzF. (1999). Introduction. In AshkenaziM.MarkowitzF. (Eds.), Sex, sexuality, and the anthropologist (pp. 1-21). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
3.
BrundsonC. (1993). Identity in feminist television criticism. Media, Culture & Society, 15, 309-320.
4.
ClarkR. (1985). Male strippers: Ladies’ night at the meat market. The Journal of Popular Culture, 19, 51-56.
5.
CupplesJ. (2002). The field as a landscape of desire: Sex and sexuality in geographical fieldwork. Area, 34, 382-390.
6.
DanilukJ. C. (2003). Women’s sexuality across the life span: Challenging myths, creating meanings. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
7.
Del BussoL. (2007). Embodying feminist politics in the research interview: Material bodies and reflexivity. Feminism & Psychology, 17, 309-315.
8.
DeLuzio ChasinC. J. (2011). Theoretical issues in the study of asexuality. Archives of Sexual Behaviour, 40, 713-723.
9.
DeMarcoJ. R. G. (2007). Power and control in gay strip clubs. Journal of Homosexuality, 53, 111-127.
10.
DobsonA. S. (2014). “Sexy” and “laddish” girls. Feminist Media Studies, 14, 253-269.
11.
DresselP. L.PetersenD. M. (1982a). Becoming a male stripper: Recruitment, socialisation, and ideological development. Work and Occupations, 9, 387-406.
12.
DresselP. L.PetersenD. M. (1982b). Gender roles, sexuality, and the male strip show: The structuring of sexual opportunity. Sociological Focus, 15, 151-162.
13.
EavesE. (2002). Bare: On women, dancing, sex and power. New York, NY: Knopf Doubleday.
14.
EdwardsR.MauthnerM. (2012). Ethics and feminist research: Theory and practice. In MillerT.BirchM.MauthnerM.JessopJ. (Eds.), Ethics in qualitative research (pp. 14-29). London, England: SAGE.
15.
EganD.FrankK.JohnsonM. L. (Eds.). (2006). Flesh for fantasy: Producing and consuming exotic dance. New York, NY: Thunder’s Press.
16.
EnglandK. V. L. (1994). Getting personal: Reflexivity, positionality, and feminist research. The Professional Geographer, 46, 80-89.
17.
FinlayL. (2006). The body’s disclosure in phenomenological research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(1), 19-30.
18.
GallopJ. (2002). Anecdotal theory. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
19.
GillR. (2007). Postfeminist media culture: Elements of a sensibility. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 10, 147-166.
20.
GillR. (2008). Empowerment/sexism: Figuring female sexual agency in contemporary advertising. Feminism & Psychology, 18, 35-60.
21.
GillR. (2012). Media, empowerment and the “sexualisation of culture” debates. Sex Roles, 66, 736-745.
22.
GrauerholzL.BarringerM.ColyerT.GuittarN.HechtJ.RayburnR. L.SwartE. (2013). Attraction in the field: What we need to acknowledge and implications for research and teaching. Qualitative Inquiry, 19, 167-178.
23.
IrwinK. (2006). Into the dark heart of ethnography: The lived ethics and inequality of intimate field relationships. Qualitative Sociology, 29, 155-175.
24.
JohnsonM. L. (2002). Jane sexes it up: True confessions of feminist desire. New York, NY: Four Walls Eight Windows.
25.
JonesR. (1999). Husbands and lovers: Gender construction and the ethnography of sex research. In MarkowitzF.AshkenaziM. (Eds.), Sexuality and the anthropologist (pp. 25-42). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
26.
KulickD. (1995). The sexual life of anthropologists: Erotic subjectivity and ethnographic work. In KulickD.WilsonM. (Eds.), Taboo: Sex, identity and erotic subjectivity in anthropological fieldwork (pp. 1-28). London, England: Routledge.
27.
KulickD.WilsonM. (Eds). (1995). Taboo: Sex, identity and erotic subjectivity in anthropological fieldwork.London, England: Routledge.
28.
La PastinaA. C. (2006). The implications of an ethnographer’s sexuality. Qualitative Inquiry, 12, 724-735.
29.
LerumK. (2001). Subjects of desire: Academic armour, intimate ethnography, and the production of critical knowledge. Qualitative Inquiry, 7, 466-483.
30.
Liepe-LevinsonK. (2002). Strip show: Performances of gender and desire. New York, NY: Routledge.
31.
MalamL. (2004). Embodiment and sexuality in cross-cultural research. Australian Geographer, 35, 177-183.
32.
MalinowskB. (1967). A diary in the strict sense of the term. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World.
33.
MargolisM. L.ArnoldM. (1993). Turning the tables? Male strippers and the gender hierarchy. In MillerB. D. (Ed.), Culture and human sexuality: A reader (pp. 334-350). London, England: Cambridge University Press.
34.
MontemurroB. (2001). Strippers and screamers: The emergence of social control in a noninstitutionalised setting. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 30, 275-304.
35.
MontemurroB.BloomC.MadellK. (2003). Ladies night out: A typology of women patrons of a male strip club. Deviant Behavior, 24, 333-352.
36.
ParkerR. G. (1989). Bodies and pleasures: On the construction of erotic meanings in contemporary Brazil. Anthropology and Humanism Quarterly, 14(2), 58-64.
37.
PetersenD. M.DresselP. L. (1982). Equal time for women: Social notes on the male strip show. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 11, 185-208.
38.
PilcherK. E. M. (2011). A “sexy space” for women? Heterosexual women’s experiences of a male strip show venue. Leisure Studies, 30, 217-235.
39.
PilcherK. E. M. (2013). Empowering, degrading or a “mutually exploitative” exchange for women? Characterising the power relations of the strip club. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 10(3), 73-83.
40.
PrehnJ. W. (1983). Invasion of the male strippers: Role alignment in a small-town strip club. The Journal of Popular Culture, 17, 182-186.
41.
RingroseJ. (2008). “Every time she bends over she pulls up her thong”: Teen girls negotiating discourses of competitive, heterosexualised aggression. Girlhood Studies, 1, 33-59.
42.
RohlingerD. A. (2002). Eroticising men: Cultural influences on advertising and male objectification. Sex Roles, 46(3), 61-74.
43.
RubinG. (1975). The traffic in women: Notes on the “political economy” of sex. In ReiterR. R. (Ed.), Toward an anthropology of women (pp. 157-210). New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
44.
ScullM. T. (2013). Reinforcing gender roles at the male strip show: A qualitative analysis of men who dance for women (MDW). Deviant Behaviour, 34, 557-578.
45.
ScullM. T. (2015). The self-concept as a side bet: How stripping enhances the self-views of men who dance for women. Deviant Behaviour, 36, 890-909.
46.
SmithC. (2002). Shiny chests and heaving g-strings: A night out with the Chippendales. Sexualities, 5(1), 67-89.
47.
TewksburyR. (1993). Male strippers: Men objectifying men. In WilliamsC. L. (Ed.), Doing “women’s work”: Men in non-traditional occupations (pp. 168–181). London, England: SAGE.
48.
TewksburyR. (1994). A dramaturgical analysis of male strippers. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 2, 325-342.
49.
ThomasJ. N.WilliamsD. J. (2016). Getting off on sex research: A methodological commentary on the sexual desires of sex researchers. Sexualities, 19(1-2), 83-97.
50.
TyeD.PowersA. M. (1998). Gender, resistance and play: Bachelorette parties in Atlantic Canada. Women’s Studies International Forum, 21, 551-561.
