This article works with the methodology of collective biography to explore the space-in-between normativity and difference/disability. Working with the memories of the participants, collective biography explores the processes of subjectification through which individuals are made social, and through which they are discursively and intracorporeally constituted. The authors of this article work with memories generated in a collective biography workshop in which they set out to explore the ethico-onto-epistemological nature of their own encounters with difference/disability. This methodology opens up the possibility of thinking differently about disability, and of seeing all human beings, notwithstanding the processes of categorization, as multiple and intra-active, and as always becoming in intra-action with others.
BaradK. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
2.
BaradK. (2008). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. In AlaimoS.HekmanS. (Eds.), Material feminisms (pp. 120-154). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
BenincasaL. (2012). Teaching lessons in exclusion: Researchers’ assumptions and the ideology of normality. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 25, 1087-1106.
ButlerJ. (1997). Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. New York, NY: Routledge.
7.
ButlerJ. (2004). Undoing gender. New York, NY: Routledge.
8.
DanermarkB.GellerstedtL. C. (2004). Social justice: Redistribution and recognition—A non-reductionist perspective on disability. Disability & Society, 19, 339-353.
9.
DaviesB. (2008). Re-thinking “behaviour” in terms of positioning and the ethics of responsibility. In PhelanA. M.SumsionJ. (Eds.), Critical readings in teacher education: Provoking absences (pp. 173-186). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
10.
DaviesB. (2011). Collaborative writing with Deleuze. In WyattJ.GaleK.GannonS.DaviesB. (Eds.), Deleuze and collaborative writing: An immanent plane of composition (pp. 130-138). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
11.
DaviesB. (2014). Listening to children: Being and becoming. London, England: Routledge.
12.
DaviesB. (2016). Emergent listening. In DenzinN. K.GiardinaM. D. (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry through a critical lens (pp. 73-84). New York, NY: Routledge.
13.
DaviesB.BanselP. (2007). Neoliberalism and education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20, 247-259.
14.
DaviesB.De SchauwerE.ClaesL.De MunckK.Van De PutteI.VersticheleM. (2013). Recognition and difference: A collective biography. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 680-690.
15.
DaviesB.GannonS. (2006). Doing collective biography. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
16.
DaviesB.GannonS. (2009). Pedagogical encounters. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
17.
DaviesB.GannonS. (2013). Collective biography and the entangled enlivening of being. International Review of Qualitative Research, 5, 357-376.
18.
DavisL. J. (1995). Enforcing normalcy: Disability, deafness, and the body. London, England: Verso.
19.
De LandaM. (1998). Meshworks, hierarchies and interfaces. In BeckmanJ. (Ed.), The virtual dimension: Architecture, representation and crash culture (p. 285). New York, NY: Princeton Architectural Press.
DeleuzeG. (1988). Spinoza: Practical philosophy (HurleyR., Trans.). San Francisco, CA: City Lights Books.
22.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1987). A thousand plateaus, capitalism and schizophrenia. London, England: Continuum.
23.
De SchauwerE.VandenbusscheH.De SchryverS.Van HoveG. (2013). The world according to Sofie: Endless search for participation. In AzzopardiA. (Ed.), Youth: Responding to lives. An international reader (pp. 179-192). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
24.
De SchauwerE.Van de PutteI.BlockmansI. G. E.DaviesB. (2016). The intra-active production of normativity and difference. Gender and Education, 31(8), 1-16.
25.
De SchauwerE.Van de PutteI.ClaesL.VersticheleM.DaviesB. (2016). Shildrick’s monster: Exploring a new approach to difference/disability through collective biography. Disability & Society, 31, 1098-1111.
26.
De SchauwerE.Van HoveG. (2011). Swimming is never without risk: Opening up on learning through activism and research. Qualitative Inquiry, 17, 224-232.
27.
EllisC. (2007). Telling secrets, revealing lives: Relational ethics in research with intimate others. Qualitative Inquiry, 13, 3-29.
28.
FergusonP.SauerJ. (2014). Introduction: Writing the global family, international perspectives on disability studies and family narratives. Review of Disability Studies: An International Journal, 9(2&3), 5-9.
MeekoshaH.ShuttleworthR. (2009). What’s so “critical” about critical disability studies?Australian Journal of Human Rights, 15(1), 47-75.
36.
MerciecaD.MerciecaD. (2010). Opening research to intensities: Rethinking disability research with Deleuze and Guattari. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 44, 79-92.
37.
St. PierreE. A. (2015). Practices for the “new” in the new empiricisms, the new materialism and post qualitative inquiry. In DenzinN.GiardinaM. (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry and the politics of research (pp. 75-95). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
38.
SherryM. (2008). Disability and diversity: A sociological perspective. New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
39.
ShildrickM. (2002). Embodying the monster: Encounters with the vulnerable self. London, England: SAGE.
40.
WiltonR. D. (1998). The constitution of difference: Space and psyche in landscapes of exclusion. Geoforum, 29, 173-185.
