This article presents a praxeologically informed approach to “transgressing the researcher-subject” in ethnography. I unfurl a concept of “strong” reflexivity as developing a perspective of unfamiliarity toward one’s own practices and beliefs. By drawing on my study on practicing ballet, I illustrate how I dealt with my own bodily involvement as a professional dance student. Comparing my approach with evocative autoethnography, I not only emphasize that corporeal sensitivity and alertness are inherent to both styles of inquiry. Yet, I also point out their differences. Whereas evocative autoethnography takes subjectivity as a resource for insights, this approach uses it as an instrument for discovery.
AbrahamA. (2006). Der Körper als Speicher von Erfahrung. Anmerkungen zu übersehenen Tiefendimensionen von Leiblichkeit und Identität [The body as a storage of experience. Notes on disregarded dimensions of lived embodiment and identity]. In GugutzerR. (Ed.), body turn. Perspektiven der Soziologie des Körpers und des Sports [body turn. Perspectives for the sociology of the body and of sports] (pp. 119-140). Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript.
2.
AndersonL. (2006). Analytic autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35, 450-465.
3.
AshmoreM. (1989). The reflexive thesis: Wrighting sociology of scientific knowledge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
4.
AtkinsonP.CoffeyA.DelamontS. (1999). Ethnography: Post, past and present. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 28, 460-471.
5.
BassettiC. (2012). Dis/comfort in bodily performance: Interactionally grounded states of experience: The case of dancers. In SalviniA.AltheideD.NutiC. (Eds.), The present and future of symbolic interactionism, Vol. 2: Sociologica (pp. 183-198). Milano, Italy: Franco Angeli.
6.
BourdieuP. (1987). Sozialer Sinn [The logic of practice]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.
7.
BreidensteinG.HirschauerS.KalthoffH.NieswandB. (2013). Ethnographie: Die Praxis der Feldforschung [Ethnography: The practice of field work]. Konstanz, Germany: UVK Verlagsgesellschaft.
8.
BurkeK. (1954). Performance and change: An anatomy of purpose. Los Altos, CA: Hermes.
9.
ChristiansC. (2000). Ethics and politics in qualitative research. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 133-155). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
10.
CliffordJ.MarcusG. E. (Eds.). (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
11.
DenzinN. (2003a). Performance ethnography: Critical pedagogy and the politics of culture. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
12.
DenzinN. (2003b). Reading and writing performance. Qualitative Research, 3, 243-268.
13.
DenzinN. (2006). Analytic autoethnography, or Deja Vu all over again. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35, 419-428.
14.
DenzinN. (2010). The qualitative manifesto: A call to arms. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
15.
EllingsonL.EllisC. (2008). Autoethnography as constructionist project. In HolsteinJ. A.GubriumJ. F. (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 445-466). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
16.
EllisC. (2000). Creating criteria: An ethnographic short story. Qualitative Inquiry, 6, 273-277.
FinleyS. (2011). Critical arts-based inquiry: The pedagogy and performance of a radical ethical aesthetic. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 497-512). London, England: SAGE.
19.
FoucaultM. (1993). Technologien des Selbst. In MartinL. H. (Ed.), Technologien des Selbst [Technologies of the self] (pp. 24-61). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Fischer.
20.
GarfinkelH. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21.
GarfinkelH. (2002). Ethnomethodology’s program: Working out Durkheim’s aphorism. London, England: Rowman & Littlefield.
22.
GeertzC. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In GeertzC. (Ed.), The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays (pp. 3-30). New York, NY: Basic Books.
23.
GeimerA. (2015). Varieties of “sociological enlightenment:” Critical arts-based inquiry versus German reconstructive social research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14, 16-32.
24.
GoffmanE. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Doubleday.
25.
GoffmanE. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
26.
GoffmanE. (1986). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
27.
GugutzerR. (2006). Der body turn in der Soziologie. Eine programmatische Einführung. In GugutzerR. (Ed.), body turn. Perspektiven der Soziologie und des Sports (pp. 9-56). Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript.
28.
HammersleyM.AtkinsonP. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
29.
HeimerlB. (2013). Die Ultraschallsprechstunde. Eine Ethnographie pränataldiagnostischer Situationen [The ultrasound clinic. An ethnography of prenatal diagnosis situations]. Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript.
30.
HirschauerS. (2006). Putting things into words. Ethnographic description and the silence of the social. Human Studies, 29, 413-441.
31.
HirschauerS. (2008). Die Empiriegeladenheit von Theorien und der Erfindungsreichtum der Praxis [The implicit empirical reference of theories and the ingenuity of practice]. In HirschauerS.KalthoffH.LindemannG. (Eds.), Theoretische Empirie. Zur Relevanz qualitativer Forschung [Theoretical empirical work. The relevance of qualitative research] (pp. 165-187). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.
32.
HirschauerS.AmannK. (1997). Die Befremdung der eigenen Kultur [De-familiarizing one’s own culture]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.
33.
HitzlerR. (1999). Welten erkunden: Soziologie als (eine Art) Ethnologie der eigenen [Discovering worlds: Sociology as a (kind of) ethology of one’s own society]. Gesellschaft Soziale Welt, 50, 473-482.
34.
HonerA. (1989). Einige Probleme lebensweltlicher Ethnographie. Zur Methodologie und Methodik einer interpretativen Sozialforschung [The problems of life world ethnography. On the methodology and methods of interpretative social research]. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 18, 297-312.
35.
HörningK. H. (2001). Experten des Alltags. Die Wiederentdeckung des praktischen Wissens [Experts of everyday life. The rediscovery of practical knowledge]. Weilerswist, Germany: Velbrück Wissenschaft.
36.
KalthoffH. (2003). Beobachtende Differenz. Instrumente der ethnografisch-soziologischen Forschung [Observational difference. Instruments of ethnographic-sociological research]. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 32(1), 70-90.
37.
KnoblauchH.RaabJ.SoeffnerH.-G.SchnettlerB. (Eds.). (2006). Video-Analysis, methodology and methods. Qualitative audiovisual data analysis in sociology. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.
38.
Knorr-CetinaK. (2001). Die Fabrikation von Erkenntnis. Zur Anthropologie der Naturwissenschaft. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.
39.
LangenohlA. (2009). Geschichte versus Genealogie. Warum die Debatte um sozialwissenschaftliche Reflexivität die Ethnomethodologie vergaß [History versus genealogy. Why the debate about reflexivity in social research forgot ethnomethodology]. Forum Qualitative Research, 10(3), Article 4.
40.
LynchM. (2000). Against reflexivity as an academic virtue and source of privileged knowledge. Theory, Culture & Society, 17(3), 26-54.
41.
MacbethD. (2001). On “reflexivity” in qualitative research: Two readings, and a third. Qualitative Inquiry, 7, 35-36.
42.
MeadG. H. (1926). The objective reality of perspectives. In BrightmanE. S. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress of Philosophy (pp. 75-85). New York, NY: Longmans, Green.
43.
MeyerC. (2014). Mikroethnographie: Praxis und Leib als Medien der Kultur [Microethnography: Practice and embodiment as media of culture]. In BenderC.ZillingerM. (Eds.), Handbuch der Medienethnographie (pp. 57-76). Berlin, Germany: Reimer.
44.
MitchellR. (2010). Im Panopticon der Bewegung. Eine ethnographische Betrachtung von Ballettproben [In the panopticon of movement. An ethnographic view on Ballet Rehearsals.] (Unpublished master’s thesis). Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
45.
MüllerS. M. (2016). Körperliche Un-Fertigkeiten. Ballett als unendliche Perfektion [Bodily in-abilities. Ballet as endless perfection]. Weilerswist, Germany: Velbrück.x
46.
NewmahrS. (2008). Becoming a sadomasochist: Integrating self and other in ethnographic analysis. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 37, 619-643.
47.
NewmahrS. (2011). Playing on the edge. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
48.
PolanyiM. (2009). The tacit dimension. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
49.
PollnerM. (1991). Left of ethnomethodology: The rise and decline of radical reflexivity. American Sociological Review, 56, 370-380.
50.
RawlsA. (2002). Editor’s introduction. In GarfinkelH. (Ed.), Ethnomethodology’s program: Working our Durkheim’s aphorism (pp. 1-64). London, England: Rowman & Littlefield.
51.
ReckwitzA. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5, 243-263.
52.
ReckwitzA. (2010). Auf dem Weg zu einer kultursoziologischen Analytik zwischen Praxeologie und Poststrukturalismus [Towards a sociology of culture between praxeology and poststructuralism]. In Wohlrab-SahrM. (Ed.), Kultursoziologie. Paradigmen – Methoden – Fragestellungen (pp. 179-205). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag.
53.
ReichertzJ. (2015). Die Bedeutung der Subjektivität in der Forschung [The relevance of subjectivity in research]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 16(3). Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1503339
54.
RyleG. (1945). Knowing how and knowing that. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 46, 1-16.
55.
RyleG. (2000). The concept of mind. London, England: Penguin Books.
56.
SchatzkiT. R. (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
57.
SchatzkiT. R.Knorr CetinaK.von SavignyE. (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. London, England: Routledge.
58.
SchefferT. (2001). Asylgewährung: eine ethnographische Analyse des deutschen Asylverfahrens [Granting asylum: An ethnographic analysis of asylum procedures in Germany]. Stuttgart, Germany: Lucius & Lucius.
59.
SchindlerL. (2009). The production of “vis-ability”: An ethnographic video analysis of a martial arts class. In KissmannU. (Ed.), Video interaction analysis (pp. 135-154). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.
60.
SchindlerL. (2011). Kampffertigkeit. Eine Soziologie praktischen Wissens [Fighting skills. A sociology of practical knowledge]. Stuttgart, Germany: Lucius & Lucius.
61.
SchmidtR. (2008). Stumme Weitergabe. Zur Praxeologie sozialisatorischer Vermittlungsprozesse [Silent transfer. On the praxeology of processes of socialization]. Zeitschrift für Soziologie der Erziehung und Sozialisation, 28,121-136.
62.
ShoveE.PantzarM.WatsonM. (2012). The dynamics of social practice: Everyday life and how it changes. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
63.
SmithC. (2005). Epistemological intimacy: A move to autoethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 4(2), Article 6.
64.
SpryT. (2011). Performative autoethnography: Critical embodiments and possibilities. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 497-512). London, England: SAGE.
65.
SudnowD. (2001). Ways of the hand. London, England: The MIT Press.
66.
van MaanenJ. (1995). An end to innocence: The ethnography of ethnography. In van MaanenJ. (Ed.), Representation in ethnography (pp. 1-25). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
67.
WacquantL. (2004). Body and soul: Ethnographic notebooks of an apprentice-boxer. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
68.
WolffS. (1999). Subjektivität für alle praktischen Zwecke [Subjectivity for all practical purposes]. Österreiche Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 24, 5-24.
69.
WoolgarS. (1988). Knowledge and reflexivity: New frontiers in the sociology of knowledge. London, England: SAGE.
70.
WulffH. (1998). Ballet across borders: Career and culture in the world of dancers. Oxford, UK: Berg.
