Development in digital tools in qualitative research over the past 20 years has been driven by the development of qualitative data analysis software (QDAS) and the Internet. This article highlights three critical issues for the future digital tools: (a) ethics and the challenges, (b) archiving of qualitative data, and (c) the preparation of qualitative researchers for an era of digital tools. Excited about the future and the possibilities of new mash-ups, we highlight the need for vibrant communities of practice where developers and researchers are supported in the creation and use of digital tools. We also emphasize the need to be able to mix and match across various digital barriers as we engage in research projects with diverse partners.
AdamsL. (2015, May). Research revolution: Digitizing paper with smartpens & smartphones. Paper presented at the meeting of International Congress on Qualitative Inquiry, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.
2.
BassettE.O’RiordanK. (2002). Ethics of Internet research: Contesting the human subjects research model. Ethics and Information Technology, 4, 233-247.
3.
BazeleyP. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: Practical strategies. London, England: SAGE.
4.
BazeleyP.JacksonK. (2013). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo (2nd ed.). London, England: SAGE.
5.
BringerJ.JohnstonL.BrackenridgeC. (2004). Maximizing transparency in a doctoral thesis: The complexities of writing about the use of QSR*NVIVO within a grounded theory study. Qualitative Research, 4, 247-265.
6.
CliggettL. (2013). Qualitative data archiving in the digital age: Strategies for data preservation and sharing. The Qualitative Report, 18, 1-11. Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/sss/QR/QR18/cliggett1.pdf
7.
CortiL.Van den EyndenV.BishopL.WoollardM. (2014). Managing and sharing research data: A guide to good practice. London, England: SAGE.
8.
DavidsonJ.di GregorioS. (2011a). Qualitative research and technology: In the midst of a revolution. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative inquiry (4th ed., pp. 627-643). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
9.
DavidsonJ.di GregorioS. (2011b). Qualitative research, technology, and global change. In GiardinaM.DenzinN. (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry and the global crisis (pp. 79-96). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
10.
DavidsonJ.FisherJ. (2012, August). Archiving qualitative research data: Opportunities and challenges for qualitative data analysis software users. Paper presented at the meeting of QSR Trainer’s Conference, Cambridge, MA.
11.
DavidsonJ.JacobsC. (2008). The implications of qualitative research software for doctoral work: Considering the individual and institutional context. Qualitative Research Journal, 8, 72-80.
12.
DicksB.MasonB. (2008). Hypermedia methods for qualitative research. In Hesse-BiberS.LeavyP. (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 601-612). New York, NY: Guildford Press.
13.
di GregorioS.DavidsonJ. (2008). Qualitative research design for software users. London, England: Open University Press.
14.
di GregorioS.DavidsonJ. (2010, October). Qualitative data analysis software development and future trends in qualitative research. Paper presented at the meeting of International Workshop on Computer-Aided Qualitative Research, Lisbon, Portugal. Retrieved from http://prezi.com/82arnt4a5pyb/qdas-development-and-future-trends/
EversJ. C.SilverC.MruckK.PeetersB. (2011). Introduction to the KWALON experiment: Discussions on qualitative data analysis software by developers and users. FORUM: Qualitative Social Research, 12(1), Article 40.
17.
FieldingN. (2008). The role of computer-assisted qualitative data analysis: Impact on emergent methods in qualitative research. In Hesse-BiberS.LeavyP. (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 675-695). New York, NY: Guildford Press.
18.
FieldingN.LeeR. (1991). Using computers in qualitative research. London, England: SAGE.
FieldingN.LeeR. (2007, April). Honouring the past, scoping the future. Paper presented at the meeting of CAQDAS 07: Advances in Qualitative Computing Conference, Royal Holloway, University of London, England.
21.
GeorgiadouL.BradfordJ.MacLarenJ. (2015, May). Discombobulations and transitions: Using blogs to make meaning of and from within liminal experiences. Paper presented at the meeting of International Congress on Qualitative Inquiry, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.
22.
GilbertL.BoudreauM.CoverdillJ.FreemanM.Harklau, LawrenceS.. . . PreissleJ. (2008, May). Faculty learning community: Experiences with qualitative data analysis software. Paper presented at the meeting of a Day in Technology in Qualitative Research of the Fourth International Congress on Qualitative Inquiry, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.
23.
GilbertL.JacksonK.di GregorioS. (2013). Tools for analyzing qualitative data: The history and relevance of qualitative data analysis software. In SpectorJ. M.MerrillM. D.ElenJ.BishopM. J. (Eds.), Handbook for research on educational communications and technology (4th ed., pp. 221-238). London, England: Routledge.
24.
Hesse-BiberS.CroftsC. (2008). User-center perspectives on qualitative data analysis software: Emergent technologies and future trends. In Hesse-BiberS.LeavyP. (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 655-674). New York, NY: Guildford Press.
25.
JacksonK. (2003). Blending technology and methodology: Toward a creative instruction of qualitative methods with NVivo. Qualitative Research Journal, 3, 96-110.
26.
JungJ. (2009, June). Extending spatial capabilities in CAQDAS or extending qualitative capabilities in GIS. Paper presented at the meeting of Computer-Aided Qualitative Research Conference, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
27.
KelleU. (Ed.). (1995). Computer-aided qualitative data analysis. London, England: SAGE.
28.
KwanM. (2008, May). Geo-narrative: Extending geographic information systems for narrative analysis in qualitative research. Paper presented at the meeting of A Day in Technology in Qualitative Research of the Fourth International Congress on Qualitative Inquiry, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.
29.
MacKenzieD.WajcmanJ. (Eds.). (1999). The social shaping of technology (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
30.
MarkhamA. N.BaymN. K. (2009). Internet inquiry: Conversations about method. London, England: SAGE.
31.
McKeeH. A.PorterJ. E. (2009). The ethics of Internet research: A rhetorical, case-based process. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
32.
PaulusT.BennettA. (in press). Integrating ATLAS.ti into qualitative research methods courses: Beyond data analysis. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. DOI: 10.1080/1743727X.2015.1056137
33.
PaulusT.LesterJ.DempsterP. (2014). Digital tools for qualitative research. London, England: SAGE.
34.
RaentoM.OulasvirtaA.EagleN. (2009). Smartphones: An emerging tool for social scientists. Sociological Methods & Research, 37, 426-454.
35.
RichardsT.RichardsL. (1994). Using computers in qualitative research. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 445-462). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
36.
SilverC.LewinsA. (2014). Using software in qualitative research: A step by step guide (2nd ed.). London, England: SAGE.
37.
Spickard-PrettymanS.JacksonK. (2006). Ethics, technology, and qualitative research: Thinking through the implications of new technologies. Paper presented at the Strategies in qualitative research using QSR software, Durham, UK. Available from http://www.qual-strategies.org
38.
SuerdemA. (2015, May). Semantic web and digital qualitative analysis tools: Some insights. Paper presented at the meeting of International Congress on Qualitative Inquiry, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.
WeitzmanE.MilesM. (1995). Computer programs for qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
41.
WoodsM.PaulusT.AtkinsD.MacklinR. (in press). Advancing qualitative research using qualitative data analysis software? Reviewing potential vs. practice in published studies using ATLAS.ti and NVivo, 1994-2013. Social Science Computing Review. DOI: 10.1177/0894439315596311
