In this article, imposters’ (or fake authors) aim is to problematize fixed concepts such as author, authoring, and authorship both in qualitative research and in organization studies—especially in relation to organizational communications that ostensibly promote and value diversity of (sexual) identity. In seeking to do so, these imposters engage with an IKEA ad and, in a process of “prospective” writing, inductively explore the absence or void of an author through a series of writing events.
AlvessonM.GabrielY. (2013). Beyond formulaic research: In praise of greater diversity in organizational research and publications. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12, 245-263.
2.
BaackD.PraschT. (1997). The death of the subject and the life of the organization: Implications of new approaches to subjectivity for organizational analysis. Journal of Management Inquiry, 6, 131-141.
3.
BarthesR. (1977). The death of the author (HeathS., Trans.). In BarthesR. (Ed.), Image, music, text (pp. 142-148). New York, NY: Hill and Wang.
4.
BarthesR. (1982). A Barthes reader (SontagS., Ed.). New York, NY: Hill and Wang.
5.
BeharR.GordonD. A. (1995). Women writing culture. Berkley: University of California Press.
6.
BenozzoA. (2013). Coming out of the credenza: An Italian celebrity unveils his new “gay” self. Sexualities, 16, 336-360.
7.
Bramwell-DavisP.FilerJ.MaddernL.Nolan MiljevicJ.NymanhallS.PorterS.. . . Wilson VasquezG. (2015). Everyday fragments on the ceiling of room 407: An open narrative inquiry space. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 15, 203-212.
8.
BrettellC. B. (1993). When they read what we write: The politics of ethnography. Westport. CT: Bergin & Garvey.
9.
Bridges-RhoadsS.Van CleaveJ. (2014). Pursuing responsibility: Writing and citing subjects in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 19, 641-652.
10.
BurkeS. (2008). The death and return of the author. Criticism and subjectivity in Barthes, Foucault and Derrida. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
11.
ButlerJ. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York, NY: Routledge.
CoffeyA. (1996). The power of accounts: Authority and authorship in ethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 9, 61-74.
14.
ColganF. (2011). Equality, diversity and corporate responsibility: Sexual orientation and diversity management in the UK private sector. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 30, 719-734.
15.
CunliffeA. L. (2001). Managers as practical authors: Reconstructing our understanding of management practice. Journal of Management Studies, 38, 351-371.
16.
CunliffeA. L. (2002). Social poetics as management inquiry: A dialogical approach. Journal of Management Inquiry, 11, 128-146.
17.
CunliffeA. L.KarunanayakeG. (2013). Working within hyphen-spaces in ethnographic research: Implication for research identities and practice. Organizational Research Methods, 16, 364-392.
18.
DeleuzeG. (1994). Difference and repetition. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
19.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (MassumiB., Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
20.
DenzinN.K. (2015). Disneyland indians: Circa Paris. Qualitative Research, 15, 506-524.
21.
DerridaJ. (1967). Of grammatology (SpivakG. C. Trans.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
22.
DugganL. (2002). The new homonormativity: The sexual politics of neoliberalism. In CastronovoR.NelsonD. D. (Eds.), Materializing democracy: Toward a revitalized cultural politics (pp. 175-194). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
23.
FineM. (1994). Working the hyphens: Reinventing self and other in qualitative research. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 70-82). London, England: SAGE.
24.
EllisC. (2004). The ethnographic I: A methodological novel about autoethnography. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
25.
FoucaultM. (1984). What is an author? In RabinowP. (Ed.), Foucault reader (pp. 101-120). New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
26.
FrowJ.MorrisM. (2005). Cultural studies. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 315-346). London, England: SAGE.
27.
GannonS. (2006). The (im)possibilities of writing the self-writing: French poststructural theory and autoethnography. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 6, 474-495.
28.
GilmoreS.KennyK. (2015). Work-worlds colliding: Self-reflexivity, power and emotions in organizational ethnography. Human Relations, 68, 55-68.
29.
GorliM.NicoliniD.ScarattiG. (2015). Reflexivity in practice: Tools and conditions for developing organizational authorship. Human Relations, 68, 1347-1375.
30.
GraneckL. (2013). Putting ourselves on the line: The epistemology of the hyphen, intersubjectivity and social responsibility in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 178-197.
31.
GuillaumeY. R. F.DawsonJ. F.WoodsS. A.SacramentoC. A.WestM. A. (2013). Getting diversity at work to work: What we know and what we still don’t know. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86, 123-141.
32.
HalberstamJ. (2011). The queer art of failure. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
33.
HallS. (1980). Encoding/decoding. In HallS.HobsonD.LoweA.WillisP. (Eds.), Culture, media, language: Working papers in cultural studies, 1972-79 (pp. 128-138). London, England: Hutchinson.
34.
HansenH.BarryD.BojeD. M.HatchM. J. (2007). Truth or consequences: An improvised collective story construction. Journal of Management Inquiry, 16, 112-126.
35.
HelinJ. (2015). Writing process after reading Bakhtin: From theorized plots to unfinalizable “living” events. Journal of Management Inquiry, 24, 174-185.
MacLureM. (2009). Broken voices, dirty words: On the productive insufficiency of voice. In JacksonA. Y.MazzeiL. A. (Eds.), Voice in qualitative research: Challenging conventional, interpretative, and critical conceptions in qualitative research (pp. 97-113). New York, NY: Routledge.
38.
OswickC.NoonM. (2014). Discourses of diversity, equality and inclusion: Trenchant formulations or transient fashions?British Journal of Management, 25, 23-39.
39.
PirandelloL. (1954). Six characters in search of an authors (MayF., Trans.). London, England: Heinemann Educational Books. (Original work published 1921)
40.
RichardsonD.MonroS. (2012). Sexuality, equality and diversity. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
41.
RoseN. (1999). Governing the soul: Shaping of the private self (2nd Rev. ed.). London, England: Free Association Books.
42.
RoseN.MillerP. (2013). Governing the present: Administering economic, social and personal life (1st ed.). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
43.
St. PierreE. A. (2011). Post qualitative research: The critique and the coming after. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 611-625). London, England: SAGE.
44.
ShotterJ. (1993). Conversational realities: Constructing life through language. London, England: SAGE.
45.
SinhaS.BackL. (2014). Making methods sociable: Dialogue, ethics and authorship in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 14, 473-487.
46.
ThorpeR.HolmanD. (2003). Management and language: The manager as a practical author. London, England: SAGE.
47.
Van CleaveJ.Bridges-RhoadsS. (2013). “As cited in” writing partnership: The (im)possibility of authorship in post-modern research. Qualitative Inquiry, 19, 674-685.
48.
WeedonC. (1997). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
