This article uses Charles Garoian’s excellent study The Prosthetic Pedagogy of Art as a jumping off point to confirm the strength of his thesis on “prosthetics of space and time.” It does so by exploring the “visual” via both Derridean and Deleuzian philosophies in relation to the image of thought. It does this through a series of thought experiments and ends with a meditation on an “accelerated aesthetic” via a televised episode from the British series Black Mirror.
ElkinsJ. (2008). Six stories from the end of representation: Images in painting, photography, astronomy, microscopy, particle physics, and quantum mechanics, 1980-2000. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
13.
EscherM. C. (1948). Drawing hands [Lithographic print, 28.2 cm × 32.2 cm].
14.
GaroianC. (2013). The prosthetic pedagogy of art: Embodied research and practice. New York: State University of New York.
15.
HansenM. B. N. (2013). Ubiquitous sensation: Toward an atmospheric, collective, and microtemporal model of media. In EkmanU. (Ed.), Throughout: Art and culture emerging with ubiquitous computing (pp. 63-88). Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
LefebvreH. (1991). The production of space (Nicholson-SmithD., Trans.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
18.
MassumiB. (2002). Parables of the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University.
19.
MeillassouxQ. (2008). After finitude: An essay in the necessity of contingency. London, England: Continuum.
20.
Merleau-PontyM. (2004). The visible and the invisible: The intertwining—The chiasm. In BaldwinT. (Ed.), The visible and the invisible. Maurice Merleau-Ponty: Basic writings (pp. 130-155). New York, NY: Routledge. (Original work published 1968)
PetersM. A.BulutE. (Eds.). (2011). Cognitive capitalism, education and digital labor. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
23.
PistersP. (2012). The Neuro-image: A Deleuzian film-philosophy of digital screen culture. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
24.
ReynoldsJ. (2007). Wounds and scars: Deleuze on time (and the ethics) of the event. Deleuze Studies, 2, 144-166.
25.
SauvagnarguesA. (2013). Art and Deleuze (BankstonS., Trans.). London, England. Bloomsbury Academic.
26.
SmithM.MorraJ. (Eds.). (2006). The prosthetic impulse: From A posthuman present to a biocultural future. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
27.
StieglerB. (1998). Technics and time, Vol. 1: The fault of Epimetheus (BeardsworthR.CollinsG., Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
28.
VirilioP. (1986). Speed and politics: An essay on dromology. New York, NY: Semiotext(e). (Original work published 1977)
29.
VossD. (2013). The philosophical concepts of meat and flesh: Deleuze and Merleau-Ponty. Parrhesia, 18, 113-124.
30.
WillsD. (2006). Technology or the discourse of speed. In SmithM.MorraJ. (Eds.), The prosthetic impulse: From a posthuman present to a biocultural future (pp. 237-263). Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
31.
ZekiS. (1999). Inner vision: An exploration of art and the brain. Oxford, UK: Oxford University.
