In this article, I explore the function of social support among women with breast or gynecologic cancers. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with women who received services from a community health organization located in northern California. Findings suggest that the path to wellness for women with cancer is one that involves negotiable interactions with family, friends, and the medical community, such as decision-making regarding treatment and lifestyle choices. Distinctions were made between the support received from other women with cancer, and that received from family and friends. In addition to having emotional and instrumental functions, social support involves the exchange of information, resulting in a greater sense of control over the cancer experience. Health care providers and others who interact with women with cancer will benefit by recognizing the importance of social support throughout the healing process.
American Cancer Society. (2015). Cancer Facts and Figures 2015. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society.
2.
AntoniM. H.KaziA.WimberlyS. R.SifreT.UrcuyoK. R.PhillipsK.. . . GluckS. (2006). How stress management improves quality of life after treatment for breast cancer. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 1143-1152. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.74.6.1152
3.
BanduraA. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.84.2.191
4.
BergB. (2009). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
5.
BloomJ. R.StewartS. L.JohnstonM.BanksP.FobairP. (2001). Sources of support and the physical and mental well-being of young women with breast cancer. Social Science & Medicine, 53, 1513-1524. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00440-8
BolgerN.FosterM.VinokurA. D.NgR. (1996). Close relationships and adjustment to a life crisis: The case of breast cancer. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 283-294. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.70.2.283
8.
BuryM. (1982). Chronic illness as biographical disruption. Sociology of Health & Illness, 4, 167-182. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.ep11339939
9.
CharmazK. (1991). Good days, bad days: The self in chronic illness and time. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
10.
CharmazK. (2002). Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis. In GubriumD. J. F.HolsteinJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of interview research (pp. 675-694). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. doi:10.4135/9781412973588.d39
11.
ConradP.BarkerK. K. (2010). The social construction of illness: Key insights and policy implications. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 51, S67-S79. doi:10.1177/0022146510383495
12.
DeLongisA.FolkmanS.LazarusR. S. (1988). The impact of daily stress on health and mood: Psychological and social resources as mediators. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 486-495. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.54.3.486
13.
DevaultM. (1999). Liberating method: Feminism and social research. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
14.
EisenbergL. (1977). Disease and illness: Distinctions between professional and popular ideas of sickness. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, 1, 9-23. doi:10.1007/BF00114808
15.
GecasV.BurkeP. J. (1995). Self and identity. In CookK. S.FineG. A.HouseJ. S. (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on social psychology (pp. 41-67). New York, NY: Basic Books. doi:10.2307/2069157
16.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
17.
GoldsteinM. S. (2000). The growing acceptance of complementary and alternative medicine. In BirdC. E.ConradP.FremontA. M. (Eds.), Handbook of medical sociology (pp. 284-297). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
18.
GrayR. E.FitchM.DavisC.PhilipsC. (1997). A qualitative study of breast cancer self-help groups. Psycho-Oncology, 6, 279-289. doi:10.1177/136345930100500205
19.
GrayR. E.SindingC.FitchM. I. (2001). Navigating the social context of metastatic breast cancer: Reflections on a project linking research to drama. Health, 5, 233-248.
20.
GubriumJ. F.HolsteinJ. A. (Eds.). (2002). Handbook of interview research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
21.
HollandK. D.HolahanC. K. (2003). The relation of social support and coping to positive adaptation to breast cancer. Psychological Health, 18, 15-29.
22.
Humboldt Community Breast Health Project. 2009. Founder’s statement. Retrieved from http://www.hcbhp.org/founder
23.
KasperA.FergusonS. (2000). Breast cancer: Society shapes an epidemic. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
24.
LueckenL. J.CompasB. E. (2002). Stress, coping, and immune function in breast cancer. Society of Behavioral Medicine, 24(4), 336-344. doi:10.1207/S15324796ABM2404_10
25.
MartindaleK. (1994). Can I get a witness? My lesbian breast cancer story. Fireweed, 42, 9-15.
26.
MayerM. (1998). Advanced breast cancer: A guide to living with metastatic disease. Cambridge, UK: O’Reilly.
27.
MorseJ. M. (2002). Interviewing the ill. In GubriumJ.HolsteinJ. (Eds.), Handbook of interview research (pp. 317-330). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. doi:10.4135/9781412973588.d20
28.
PopayJ.WilliamsG. (1996). Public health research and lay knowledge. Social Science & Medicine, 42, 759-768. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(95)00341-X
29.
RidderD.SchreursK. (2001). Developing interventions for chronically ill patients: Is coping a helpful concept?Clinical Psychology Review, 21, 205-240.
30.
RosenbergM. (1981). The self-concept: Social product and social force. In RosenbergM.TurnerR. H. (Eds.), Social psychology: Sociological perspectives (pp. 593-624). New York, NY: Basic Books.
31.
SulikG. A. (2007). On the receiving end: Women, caring, and breast cancer. Qualitative Sociology, 30, 297-314. doi:10.1007/s11133-007-9057-x
32.
SulikG. A. (2011). “Our diagnoses, our selves”: The rise of the technoscientific illness identity. Sociology Compass, 5, 463-477. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9020.2011.00374.x
33.
SulikG. A.Eich-KrohmA. (2008). No longer a patient: The social construction of the medical consumer. In ChambréS. M.GoldnerM. (Eds.), Advances in medical sociology: Patients, consumers and civil society (Vol. 10, pp. 3-28). Bingley, UK: Emerald. doi:10.1016/S1057-6290(08)10002-X
34.
SymisterP.FriendR. (2003). The influence of social support and problematic support on optimism and depression in chronic illness: A prospective study evaluating self-esteem as a mediator. Health Psychology, 22, 123-129. doi:10.1037//0278-6133.22.2.123
35.
TaylorS. J.BogdanR. (1998). Introduction to qualitative research methods. New York, NY: Wiley.
36.
TaylorS. J.FalkeR.ShoptawS.LichtmanR. (1986). Social support, support groups, and the cancer patient. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 608-615. doi:10.1037//0022-006X.54.5.608
37.
UttalL.CuádrazG. H. (1999). Intersectionality and in-depth interviews: Methodological strategies for analyzing and race, class, and gender. Race Gender & Class, 6, 156-186.
38.
WeitznerM. A.HaleyW. E.ChenH. (2000). The family caregiver of the older cancer patient. Hematology Oncology Clinics of North America, 14, 269-281.
