Within this article, we critically reflect on the production and reproduction of knowledge(s) within the academic study of sport—a field dominated (to its detriment) by self-destructive versions of reductionist science that (subconsciously) act as insidious components of the social and economic condition that privileges “state” science and fail to do justice to the potentialities of “the physical” in overcoming social, political, and health inequalities. To counter such regressive orthodoxies, we focus on a corporeal/technoslow approach to the curriculum/pedagogy in an effort to initiate dialogue about a more progressive and democratic social science of sport, leisure, and physical cultures—a transgressive pedagogy that can encourage transformation and the political potentialities of “the physical.”
Allen-CollinsonJ.HockeyJ. (2011). Feeling the way: Notes toward a haptic phenomenology of distance running and scuba diving. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 46, 330-345.
2.
AndrewsD. (2008). Kinesiology’s inconvenient truth and the physical cultural studies imperative. Quest, 60, 45-62.
3.
BairnerA. (2012). For a sociology of sport. Sociology of Sport Journal, 29, 102-117.
4.
BallS. J. (2012). Performativity, commodification and commitment: An I-spy guide to the neoliberal university. British Journal of Educational Studies, 60, 17-28.
5.
BarnettR.GriffinA. (Eds.). (1997). The end of knowledge in higher education. London, England: Cassell.
6.
BiestaG. (2012). Becoming public: Public pedagogy, citizenship and the public sphere. Social & Cultural Geography, 13, 683-697.
7.
BishopJ. L.VerlegerM. A. (2013, June). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education, Atlanta, GA.
BrennerD. (2006). Performative pedagogy: Resignifying teaching in the corporatized university. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 28, 3-24.
10.
BrophyS.HladkiJ. (2012). Introduction: Pedagogy, image practices, and contested corporealities. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 34, 75-81.
11.
BrownW. (2006). American nightmare: Neoliberalism, neoconservatism, and de-democratization. Political Theory, 34, 690-714.
12.
BuchananR. (2011). Paradox, promise and public pedagogy: Implications of the federal government’s Digital Education Revolution. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36, 66-78.
13.
BurdickJ.SandlinJ.O’MalleyM. (2013). Problematizing public pedagogy. London, England: Routledge.
14.
CannellaG. S. (2011). Political possibility, hypercapitalism, and the “conservative reeducation machine.”Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 11, 364-368.
15.
CollinR.AppleM. (2010). New literacies and new rebellions in the global age. In AppleM. (Ed.), Global crises, social justice, and education (pp. 24-60). New York, NY: Routledge.
16.
DenzinN. (2012). “Afterword.” InSilkM.AndrewsD. (Eds.), Sport and neoliberalism: Politics, consumption, and culture (pp. 294-302). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
17.
EllsworthE. (2005). Places of learning: Media, architecture, pedagogy. New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer.
18.
EvansJ.DaviesB.RichE. (2013). We/you can tell talk from matter: A conversation with Hakan Larrson and Mikael Quennerstedt. Sport, Education and Society, 19, 652-665.
19.
EvansM. (2004). Killing thinking: The death of the universities. London, England: Continuum.
20.
FrancombeJ. (2013). Methods that move: A physical performative pedagogy of subjectivity. Sociology of Sport Journal, 30, 256-273.
21.
FrowJ.MorrisM. (2000). Cultural studies. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 315-346). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
22.
FuscoC. (2006). Inscribing healthification: Governance, risk, surveillance and the subjects and spaces of fitness and health. Health & Place, 12, 65-78.
23.
GarbuttR.OffordB. (2012). A scholarly affair: Activating cultural studies. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 34(1-2), 3-7.
24.
Gaztambide-FernándezR.Arraiz-MatuteA. (2013). “Pushing against”: Relationality, intentionality, and the ethical imperative of pedagogy. In BurdickJ.SandlinJ.O’MalleyM. (Eds.), Problematizing public pedagogy (pp. 52-64). New York, NY: Routledge.
25.
GiardinaM. D.NewmanJ. (2011). The physical and the possible. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 11, 392-402.
26.
GillD. L. (2007). Integration: The key to sustaining kinesiology in higher education. Quest, 59, 270-286.
27.
GirouxH. (2001). “Something’s missing”: Cultural studies, neoliberalism and the politics of hope. Strategies: Journal of Theory, Culture & Politics, 14, 227-252.
28.
GirouxH. (2004). Cultural studies, Public pedagogy and the responsibility of intellectuals. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 1, 59-79.
GirouxH. (2009). Democracy’s nemesis: The rise of the corporate university. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 9, 669-695.
31.
GirouxH. (2010a). Bare pedagogy and the scourge of neoliberalism: Rethinking higher education as a democratic public sphere. The Educational Forum, 74, 184-196.
32.
GirouxH. (2010b). Dumbing down teachers: Rethinking the crisis of public education and the demise of the social state. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 32, 339-381.
33.
GirouxH.Searls GirouxS. (2012). Universities gone wild: Big money, big sports, and scandalous abuse at Penn State. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 12, 267-273.
34.
GordonA. (1997). Ghostly matters: Haunting and the sociological imagination. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
35.
HartmanY.DarabS. (2012). A call for slow scholarship: A case study on the intensification of academic life and its implications for pedagogy. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 34, 49-60.
36.
HarveyD. (2003). The new imperialism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
37.
InghamA. G. (1997). Toward a department of physical cultural studies and an end to tribal warfare. In Fernandez-BalboaJ. (Ed.), Critical postmodernism in human movement, physical education, and sport (pp. 157-182). Albany: State University of New York Press.
38.
InghamA. G.DonnellyP. (1990). Whose knowledge counts? The production of knowledge and issues of application in the sociology of sport. Sociology of Sport Journal, 7, 58-65.
39.
LakoffG. (2006). Whose freedom? The battle over America’s most important idea. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
40.
LathamA. (2003). Research, performance, and doing human geography: Some reflections on the diary-photograph, diary-interview method. Environment and Planning A, 35, 1993-2018.
41.
LatherP. (2006). This is your father’s paradigm: Government intrusion and the case of qualitative research in education. In DenzinN.GiardinaM.Walnut CreekM. (Eds.), Qualitative research and the conservative challenge (pp. 31-56). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
42.
LincolnY.CanellaG. (2004). Dangerous discourses, methodological fundamentalism, and governmental regimes of truth. Qualitative Inquiry, 10, 5-14.
43.
LorimerH. (2005). Cultural geography: The busyness of being “more-than-representational.”Progress in Human Geography, 29, 83-94. doi:10.1191/0309132505ph531pr
44.
MerchantS. (2011). Negotiating underwater space: The sensorium, the body and the practice of scuba-diving. Tourist Studies, 11, 215-234.
45.
MillerT. (2001). What it is and what it isn’t: Introducing . . . Cultural Studies. In MillerT. (Ed.), A companion to cultural studies (pp. 1-20). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
46.
MillerT.AhluwaliaP. (2011). Why the humanities and social sciences are vital. Social Identities, 17, 603-604.
47.
MurrayS. J.HolmesD.PerronA.RailG. (2007). No exit? Intellectual integrity under the regime of “evidence” and “best-practices.”Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 13, 512-516.
48.
MurrayS. J.HolmesD.RailG. (2008). On the constitution and status of “evidence” in the health sciences. Journal of Research in Nursing, 13, 272-280.
49.
NandyA. (1988). Science as a reason of state. In NandyA. (Ed.), Science, hegemony and violence: A requiem for modernity (pp. 1-23). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
50.
PavlidisA.FullagarS. (2013). Becoming roller derby grrrls: Exploring the gendered play of affect in mediated sport cultures. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 48, 673-688.
51.
PillowW. S. (2003). Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16, 175-196.
52.
PinkS. (2011). From embodiment to emplacement: Re-thinking competing bodies, senses and spatialities. Sport, Education and Society, 16, 343-355.
ProbynE. (2004). Teaching bodies: Affects in the classroom. Body & Society, 10(4), 21-43.
55.
ReadingsB. (1996). The university in ruins. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
56.
RichE. (2011). Exploring the relationship between pedagogy and physical cultural studies: The case of new health imperatives in schools. Sociology of Sport Journal, 28, 64-84.
57.
RitzerG. (2004). The McDonaldization of society (Rev.New Century ed.). London, England: SAGE.
58.
RogersD. (2012). Research, practice and the space between: Care of the self within neoliberalized institutions. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 12, 242-254.
59.
RoseN. (2013). The human sciences in a biological age. Theory, Culture & Society, 30(3), 3-34.
60.
RutherfordJ. (2005). Cultural studies in the corporate university. Cultural Studies, 19, 297-317.
61.
SandlinJ. A.O’MalleyM.BurdickJ. (2011). Mapping the complexity of public pedagogy scholarship: 1894-2010. Review of Educational Research, 81, 338-375.
62.
SandlinJ. A.WrightR. R.ClarkM. C. (2013). Re-examining theories of adult learning and adult development through the lenses of public pedagogy. Adult Education Quarterly, 63, 2-23.
63.
ShivaV. (1998). Reductionist science as epistemological violence. In NandyA. (Ed.), Science, hegemony & violence: A requiem for modernity (pp. 232-256). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
64.
SilkM.AndrewsD.BushA.FrancombeJ. (2013). McKinesiology. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 35, 335-356.
65.
SilkM.Francombe-WebbJ.AndrewsD. (2014). Slowing the social sciences of sport: On the possibilities of physical culture. Sport in Society, 17, 1266-1289.
66.
SonuD. (2012). Illusions of compliance: Performing the public and hidden transcripts of social justice education in neoliberal times. Curriculum Inquiry, 42 (2), 240-259.
67.
SparkesA. C. (2013). Qualitative research in sport, exercise and health in the era of neoliberalism, audit and New Public Management: Understanding the conditions for the (im)possibilities of a new paradigm dialogue. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 5, 440-459.
68.
SpencerD. C. (2009). Habit(us), body techniques and body callusing: An ethnography of mixed martial arts. Body & Society, 15(4), 119-143. doi:10.1177/1357034x09347224
69.
StevensonN. (2010). Critical pedagogy, democracy and capitalism: Education without enemies or borders. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 32, 66-92.
70.
ThorpeH.RinehartR. (2010). Alternative sport and affect: Non-representational theory examined. Sport in Society, 13, 1268-1291.
71.
ThriftN. J. (1996). Spatial formations. London, England: SAGE.
72.
TitchkoskyT. (2012). The ends of the body as pedagogic possibility. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 34, 82-93.
