In this article, the authors discuss how they—as legal scholars—have incorporated principles of participatory action research into their work as critical race/feminist legal researchers. Concerned particularly with how predatory lending practices are exacerbating economic inequalities in the United States, the authors describe their ongoing community-based research on the “fringe economy” and the importance of bringing critical race/feminist insights to issues of economic justice.
American Association of Retired Persons (AARP), Center for Responsible Lending (CRL), Consumer Federation of America, Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, NAACP, National Consumer Law Center, and the National Council of La Raza. (2013, April30). Comments to the FDIC and OCC on Proposed Guidance on Deposit Advance Products, n. 7, 78 Fed. Reg. 25268 (2013).
2.
Bar-GillO.WarrenE. (2008). Making credit safer. University of Pennsylvania Law Review PENNumbra, 157, 1-101.
3.
BarndtD. (2014). Photovoice. In Brydon-MillerM.CoghlanD. (Eds.), Sage encyclopedia of action research (pp. 620-623). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
4.
BarrM. S. (2012). No slack: The financial lives of low-income Americans. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
5.
BaumF.MacDougallC.SmithD. (2006). Participatory action research: Glossary. Journal of Epidemiology Community Health, 60, 854-857.
6.
BellE. E. (1992). Myths, stereotypes, and realities of Black women: A personal reflection. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 28, 363-376.
7.
BellE. E. (2001). Infusing race into the US discourse on action research. In ReasonP.BradburyH. (Eds.), SAGE handbook of action research: Participatory inquiry and practice (1st ed., pp. 48-58). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
8.
BrooksR. R. W. (2006). Credit past due. Columbia Law Review, 106, 994-1028.
9.
BrownE. B. (1995). Imaging lynching: African American women communities of struggle and collective memory. In SmithermanG. (Ed.), African American women speak out on Anita Hill-Clarence Thomas (pp. 100-124). Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
10.
Brydon-MillerM. (1993). Breaking down barriers: Accessibility self-advocacy in the disabled community. In ParkP. (Ed.), Voices of change: Participatory action research in the United States and Canada (pp. 125-143). Westport. CT: Bergin & Garvey.
Brydon-MillerM.KralM. J.MaguireP.NoffkeS.SabhlokA. (2013). Jazz and the Banyan tree: Roots and riffs in participatory action research. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (4th ed., pp. 337-346). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
CaskeyJ. P. (1996). Fringe banking: Check-cashing outlets, pawnshops, and the poor (Paperback ed.). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
15.
ChamallasM. (2013). Introduction to feminist legal theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.
16.
ChoS. (2009). Post-racialism. Iowa Law Review, 94, 1589-1650.
17.
ClarkK. B. (1965). Dark ghetto: Dilemmas of social power. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
18.
CrenshawK.GotandaN.PellerG.ThomasK. (Eds.). (1995). Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement. New York, NY: New Press.
19.
DelgadoR.StefancicJ. (Eds.). (2013). Critical race theory: The cutting edge (3rd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
20.
EmburyD. C. (2014). Fishbone diagrams. In Brydon-MillerM.CoghlanD. (Eds.), Sage encyclopedia of action research (pp. 353-355). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
21.
Fals BordaO. (2006). The north-south convergence: A 30-year first-person assessment of PAR. Action Research, 4, 351-358.
Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Conforming Amendments Act of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109-173, § 7(a)(1), 119 Stat. 3601, 3609–10.
25.
FreireP. (1996). Letters to Cristina: Reflections on my life and work. New York, NY: Routledge.
26.
FryR. (2014). Appreciative inquiry. In Brydon-MillerM.CoghlanD. (Eds.), Sage encyclopedia of action research (pp. 44-53). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
27.
HallE. J.RodriguezM. S. (2003). The myth of postfeminism. Gender & Society, 17, 878-902.
28.
HarrisJ.McCulloughW. D. (1998). Quantitative methods and Black community studies. In LadnerJ. A. (Ed.), The death of white sociology (pp. 331-343). Baltimore, MD: Black Classic Press.
29.
HouhE. M. S. (2003). Critical interventions: Toward an expansive equality approach to the doctrine of good faith in contract law. Cornell Law Review, 88, 1025-1096.
30.
HouhE. M. S. (2005). Critical race realism: Re-claiming the antidiscrimination principle through the doctrine of good faith in contract law. University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 66, 455-520.
31.
HouhE. M. S. (2014). Critical race theory. In Brydon-MillerM.CoghlanD. (Eds.), SAGE encyclopedia of action research (pp. 215-218). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
32.
HouhE. M. S.KalsemK. (2014). It’s critical: Legal participatory action research. Michigan Journal of Race & Law, 287-347.
33.
JohnsonC. (2002). Payday loans: Shrewd business or predatory lending?Minnesota Law Review, 87, 1-152.
34.
KalsemK.WilliamsV. (2010). Social justice feminism. UCLA Women’s Law Journal, 18, 131-194.
35.
KalsemK. B. (2006). Bankruptcy reform and financial well-being: How intersectionality matters in money matters. Brooklyn Law Review, 71, 1181-1232.
36.
KiddS. A.KralM. J. (2005). Practicing participatory action research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 187-195.
37.
KirbyS. L.GreavesL.ReidC. (2010). Introduction. In KirbyS.GreavesL.ReidC. (Eds.), Experience research social change: Methods beyond the mainstream (pp. 1-9). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
38.
KishbaughC.HayesJ. (2013). The gendered dynamics of income security: How social science research can identify pathways out of poverty and toward economic security. Retrieved from http://www.iwpr.org/publications/recent-publications
39.
LadnerJ. A. (1971). Tomorrow’s tomorrow: The Black woman. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
40.
LewisT. E. (2012). Teaching with pensive images: Rethinking curiosity in Paulo Freire’s Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 46, 27-45.
41.
LittwinA. (2008). Beyond usury: A study of credit-card use and preference among low-income consumers. Texas Law Review, 86, 451-506.
42.
LittwinA. (2009). Testing the substitution hypothesis: Would credit card regulations force low-income borrowers into less desirable lending alternatives. University of Illinois Law Review, 2009, 403-456.
43.
LópezG.ParkerL. (Eds.). (2003). Interrogating racism in qualitative research methodology. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
44.
LouisV. (2014). Concept mapping. In Brydon-MillerM.CoghlanD. (Eds.), Sage encyclopedia of action research (pp. 114-115). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
45.
MacLeanK. T. (1966). Origins of the Southern civil rights movement: Myles Horton and the Highlander Folk School. The Phi Delta Kappan, 47, 487-489.
46.
MaguireP. (1987). Doing participatory research: A feminist approach. Amherst: Center for International Education, University of Massachusetts.
47.
MaguireP. (2000). Doing participatory research: A feminist approach (2nd ed.). Amherst, MA: Center for International Education.
48.
MannR. J. (2008). A requiem for Sam’s bank. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 83, 953-974.
49.
MannR. J.HawkinsJ. (2007). Just until payday. UCLA Law Review, 54, 855-912.
50.
MartinN. (2010). 1,000% interest—Good while supplies last: A study of payday loan practices and solutions. Arizona Law Review, 52, 563-622.
51.
MartinN.AdamsO. (2012). Grand theft auto loans: Repossession and demographic realities in title lending. Missouri Law Review, 77, 41-94.
52.
MatsudaM. J. (1987). Looking to the bottom: Critical legal studies and reparations. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 22, 323-400.
53.
MorawskiJ. (1997). The science behind feminist research methods. Journal of Social Issues, 53, 667-681.
PillowW. S. (2003). Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16, 175-196.
RansbyB. (1995). A righteous rage and a grassroots mobilization. In SmithermanG. (Ed.), African American women speak out on Anita Hill-Clarence Thomas (pp. 45-52). Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
63.
ReidC.FrisbyW. (2008). Continuing the journey: Articulating dimensions of feminist participatory research (FPAR). In ReasonP.BradburyH. (Eds.), SAGE handbook of action research: Participatory inquiry and practice (2nd ed., pp. 93-105). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
64.
RosinH. (2012). The end of men: And the rise of women. New York, NY: Riverhead Books.
65.
SmithL.BratiniL.ChambersD.JensenR. V.RomeroL. (2010). Between idealism and reality: Meeting the challenges of participatory action research. Action Research, 8, 407-425.
66.
Thayer-BaconB. (2004). An explanation of Myles Horton’s democratic praxis: Highlander folk school. Educational Foundations, 18, 5-23.
67.
ThomasR. J. (2007). Rolling over borrowers: Preventing excessive refinancing and other necessary changes in the payday loan industry. William & Mary Law Review, 48, 2401-2436.
68.
WaltersR. (1998). Toward a definition of black social science. In LadnerJ. A. (Ed.), The death of white sociology (pp. 190-212). Baltimore, MD: Black Classic Press.
69.
WingA. K. (Ed.). (2003). Critical race feminism: A reader (2nd ed.). New York: New York University Press.
70.
Zuber-SkerrittO. (1996). Emancipatory action research for organisational change and management development. In Zuber-SkerrittO. (Ed.), New directions in action research (pp. 68-87). London, England: Falmer Press.
