BrinkmannS. (2014). Doing without data. Qualitative Inquiry, 20, 720-725.
4.
CarspeckenP.CordeiroP. (1995). Being, doing, and becoming: Textual interpretations of social identity and a case study. Qualitative Inquiry, 1, 87-109.
5.
DuncombeJ.JessopJ. (2002). “Doing rapport” and the ethics of “faking friendship.” In MauthnerM.BirchM.JessopJ.MillerT. (Eds.), Ethics in qualitative research (pp. 107-122). London, England: SAGE.
6.
FinleyS.KnowlesG. (1995). Researcher as artist/artist as researcher. Qualitative Inquiry, 1, 110-142.
7.
GumbrechtH. U. (2004). Production of presence: What meaning cannot convey. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
8.
KvaleS. (1995). The social construction of validity. Qualitative Inquiry, 1, 19-40.
9.
KvaleS. (2006). Dominance through interviews and dialogues. Qualitative Inquiry, 12, 480-500.
10.
LatherP. (1995). The validity of angels: Interpretive and textual strategies in researching the lives of women with HIV/AIDS. Qualitative Inquiry, 1, 41-68.
11.
MacLureM. (2013). Classification or wonder? Coding as an analytic practice in qualitative research. In ColemanR.RingroseJ. (Eds.), Deleuze and research methodologies (pp. 164-183). Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
12.
SontagS. (1990). Against interpretation. In Against interpretation and other essays (pp. 3-14). New York, NY: Anchor Books. (Original work published 1964)
13.
St. PierreE. A. (2008). Decentering voice in qualitative inquiry. International Review of Qualitative Research, 1, 319-336.
14.
St. PierreE. A. (2011). Post qualitative research: The critique and the coming after. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 611-626). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
15.
StraussA. (1995). Notes on the nature and development of general theories. Qualitative Inquiry, 1, 7-18.