The global qualitative research community faces a number of challenges that can be addressed by deploying a critical framework modeled after the work of C. W. Mills and Paulo Freire.
BrinkmannS.KvaleS. (2008). Ethics in qualitative psychological research. In WilligC.Stainton-RogersW. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 261-279). London, England: SAGE.
2.
CannellaG. S.LincolnY. S. (2007). Predatory vs. dialogic ethics: Constructing an illusion or ethical practice as the core of research methods. Qualitative Inquiry, 13, 315-335.
3.
CharmazK. (2005). Grounded theory in the 21st century: A qualitative method for advancing social justice research. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 507-535). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
4.
ClarkM. C.ScheurichJ. J. (2008). Editorial: The state of qualitative research in the early twenty-first century—Take 2. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 21, 313.
5.
DenzinN. K. (2009). Qualitative inquiry under fire: Toward a new paradigm dialogue. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
6.
DenzinN. K. (2010). The qualitative manifesto: A call to arms. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
7.
DillardC. B. (2006). When the music changes, so should the dance: Cultural and spiritual considerations in paradigm “proliferation.”International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19, 59-76.
8.
FaulknerW. (l967). Address upon receiving the Nobel Prize for literature. In CowleyM. (Ed.), The portable Faulkner (Rev. & Exp. ed., pp. 723-724). New York, NY: Viking Press.
9.
FlickU. (2014). An introduction to qualitative research (5th ed.). London, England: SAGE.
10.
FreireP. (2001). Pedagogy of the oppressed: With an introduction by Donaldo Macedo (30th anniversary ed.). New York, NY: Continuum.
11.
GageN. L. (1989). The paradigm wars and their aftermath: A “historical sketch” of research and teaching since 1989. Educational Researcher, 18(7), 4-10.
12.
GubaE. (1990a). The alternative paradigm dialog. In GubaE. (Ed.), The paradigm dialog (pp. 17-30). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
13.
GubaE. (1990b). Carrying on the dialog. In GubaE. (Ed.), The paradigm dialog (pp. 368-378). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
14.
GubaE.LincolnY. S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, and emerging confluences. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 191-216). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
15.
HemingwayE. (1940). For whom the bell tolls. New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
16.
Hesse-BiberS. N.LeavyP. (2008). Introduction: Pushing on the methodological boundaries—The growing need for emergent methods within and across the disciplines. In Hess-BiberS. N.LeavyP. (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 1-15). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
17.
hooksb. (2005). Teaching to community: A pedagogy of hope. New York, NY: Routledge.
18.
HoweK. R. (1988). Against the quantitative-qualitative incompatibility thesis (or dogmas die hard). Educational Researcher, 17(8), 10-16.
19.
HoweK. R. (2004). A critique of experimentalism. Qualitative Inquiry, 10, 42-61.
20.
HoweK. R. (2009). Positivist dogmas, rhetoric, and the education science question. Education Researcher, 38, 428-440.
JacksonA. Y.MazzeiL. A. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. London, England: Routledge.
23.
JamesW. (1909). The meaning of truth. New York, NY: Longmans.
24.
KvaleS. (2008). Qualitative inquiry between scientistic evidentialism, ethical subjectivism and the free market. International Review of Qualitative Research, 1, 5-18.
25.
LatherP. (2007). Getting lost: Feminist efforts toward a double (d) science. Albany: State University of New York Press.
26.
LincolnY. S. (2010). “What a long, strange trip it’s been . . .”: 25 Years of qualitative and new paradigm research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 3-9.
27.
MacLureM. (2009). Broken voices, dirty words: On the productive insufficiency of voice. In JacksonA. Y.MazzeiL. A. (Eds.), Voice in qualitative inquiry: Challenging conventional, interpretive, and critical conceptions in qualitative research (pp. 97-114). London, England: Routledge.
28.
MadisonS. D. (2010). Acts as activism: Human Rights as radical performance. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
29.
MarcusG. E. (2009). Introduction: Notes toward an ethnographic memoir of supervising graduate research through anthropology’s decades of transformation. In FaubionJ. D.MarcusG. E. (Eds.), Fieldwork is not what it used to be: Learning anthropology’s method in a time of transition (pp. 1-34). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
30.
McLarenP.KincheloeJ. L. (Eds.). (2007). Critical pedagogy: Where are we now?New York, NY: Peter Lang.
31.
MillsC. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
32.
MorseJ. M.NiehausL. (2009). Mixed method design: Principles and procedures. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
33.
NesporJ. (2006). Morphologies of inquiry: The uses and spaces of paradigm proliferation. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19, 115-128.
34.
PeliasR. J. (2004). A methodology of the heart. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
35.
ScheurichJ. J.ClarkM. C. (2006). Qualitative studies in education at the beginning of the twenty-first century. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19, 401.
36.
SeigfriedC. H. (1996). Pragmatism and feminism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
37.
St. PierreE. A. (2011). Post qualitative research: The critique and the coming after. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 611-625). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
38.
TeddlieC.TashakkoriA. (2003). Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 3-59). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
39.
TeddlieC.TashakkoriA. (2011). Mixed methods research. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (4th ed., pp. 285-299). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
40.
WeemsM. (2002). I speak from the wound in my mouth. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
41.
WestC. (1991). Theory, pragmatisms and politics. In AracJ.JohnsonB. (Eds.), Consequences of theory (pp. 22-38). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
