In this article, the authors update key constructs in the area of ethics within qualitative research in literacy. Issues such as newer interpretive theory, media incursion into data security, and newer expectations for privacy problematize what were once “taken-for-granted” assumptions about the ethical conduct of qualitative inquiry as it is now practiced in the fields of literacy education and queered ethics.
BerryK.ClairR. (2011). Contestation and opportunity in reflexivity: An introduction. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 11, 95-97.
5.
BogdanR.BiklenS. (1982). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
6.
ButlerJ. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex.”New York, NY: Routledge.
7.
CannellaG.LincolnY. (2007). Predatory ethics vs. dialogic ethics: Constructing an illusion or ethical practice as the core of research methods. Qualitative Inquiry, 13, 315-335.
8.
CarbaughD.NuciforoE.Molina-MarkhamE.van OverB. (2011). Discursive reflexivity in the ethnography of communication: Cultural discourse analysis. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 11, 153-164.
9.
CloughP. (1992). The end(s) of ethnography: From realism to social criticism. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
10.
DenzinN. (2002). Much ado about Goffman. American Sociologist, 33, 105-117.
11.
FabianJ. (2002). Time and the other: How anthropology makes its object (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
12.
GoffmanE. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Doubleday.
13.
GoodallH. (2000). Writing the new ethnography. Lanham, MD: Alta Mira Press.
14.
GunsulasC.BrunerE.BurbulesN.DashL.FinkinM.GoldbergJ.. . .AronsonD. (2007). The Illinois white paper: Improving the system for protecting human subjects: Counteracting IRB “mission creep.”Qualitative Inquiry, 13, 617-649.
15.
HarreR.Van LangenhoveL. (1998). Positioning theory: Moral contexts of international action. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
16.
HollandK. (2007). The epistemological bias in ethics review: Constraining mental health research. Qualitative Inquiry, 13, 895-913.
17.
HumphreysL. (1970a). Tearoom trade: Impersonal sex in public places. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
18.
HumphreysL. (1970b). Tearoom trade: Impersonal sex in public places. Trans-Action, 7, 10-25.
19.
HumphreysL. (1980). Social science: Ethics of research. Science, 207, 713-714.
20.
KincaidJ. (1998). Erotic innocence: The culture of child molesting. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
21.
KingJ.StahlN. (1986, October). Towards methodological and ethical standards in qualitative literacy research. 30th College Reading Association Conference, Knoxville, TN.
22.
LavinD. (1971). [Review of the book Tearoom trade: Impersonal sex in public places, by L. Humphreys]. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 398, 199-200.
23.
LewisC.EncisoP.MojeE. (Eds.). (2007). Reframing sociocultural research on literacy: Identity, agency, and power. New York, NY: Routledge.
24.
MadisonD. (2011). The labor of reflexivity. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 11, 129-138.
25.
MarfoK. (2011). Forward. In OkwanyA.NgutukuE.MahangiA. (Eds.), The role of local knowledge and culture in child care in Africa: A sociological study of several ethnic groups in Kenya and Uganda (pp. i-v). Lewiston, NY: Edwin Millen Press.
26.
MarfoK.BierstikerL. (2011). Exploring culture, play, and early childhood education practice in African contexts. In RogersS. (Ed.), Rethinking play and pedagogy in early childhood education (pp. 73-85). New York, NY: Routledge.
MurrayL.PushorD.RenichanP. (2012). Reflections on the ethics-approval process. Qualitative Inquiry, 18, 43-54.
29.
PattersonD. (2008). Research ethics boards as spaces of marginalization: A Canadian story. Qualitative Inquiry, 14, 18-27.
30.
ReissI. (1971). [Review of Tearoom Trade: Impersonal sex in public places, by L. Humphreys]. American Sociological Review, 36, 581-583.
31.
RosenL. (1972). [Review of Tearoom Trade: Impersonal sex in public places, by L. Humphreys]. Journal of Marriage and Family, 34, 382-384.
32.
SardarZ. (1998). Postmodernism and the other: The new imperialism of Western culture. London, England: Pluto Press.
33.
SitziaL. (2003). A shared authority: An impossible goal?Oral History Review, 30, 87-101.
34.
StahlN.KingJ. (1986, April). Towards methodological and ethical standards in qualitative literacy research in developmental education. 11th Annual University of Georgia System Developmental Studies Conference, Jekyll Island, GA.
35.
TierneyW.CorwinZ. (2007). Tensions between academic freedom and IRBs. Qualitative Inquiry, 13, 388-398.
36.
van MaanenJ. (1988). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
37.
van MaanenJ. (Ed.). (1995). Representation in ethnography. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
