Research has shown that some battered women have incorporated a discourse that victimizes them again as a consequence of the wrong intervention of external agents (friends, social services, legal systems). They, however, can be active subjects of their personal transformation. This study presents how women are empowered through participation in communicative daily life stories (CDLS), where their life experiences are contrasted with the main scientific contributions from violence against women research. It also discusses the way in which the victimizing discourse is made visible and re-elaborated in the dialogue between the researcher and the women being researched. CDLS do not impose a theoretical discourse that women have to accept, but rather provide the space of dialogue with them to discuss the scientific evidences about gender violence.
AgoffC.HerreraC.CastroR. (2007). The weakness of family ties and their perpetuating effects on gender violence: A qualitative study in Mexico. Violence Against Women, 13, 1206-1220. doi:10.1177/1077801207307800
2.
BakhtinM. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
3.
BowkerL. H. (1993). A battered woman’s problems are social, not psychological. In GellesR. J.LosekeD. R. (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 154-165). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
4.
BrownM.GómezA.MuntéA. (2013). Procesos dialógicos de planificación de los servicios sociales: el proceso de cambio en los barrios de la Milagrosa y la Estrella [Dialogic processes of social services’ planification: the process of change in the neighborhoods of La Estrella and La Milagrosa] (Albacete). Scripta Nova. Revista electrónica de Geografía y Ciencias Sociales. Retrieved from http://www.ub.edu/geocrit/sn/sn-427/sn-427-6.htm
5.
CourtD.AbbasR. (2013). Whose interview is it, anyway? Methodological and ethical challenges of insider & outsider research, multiple languages, and dual-researcher cooperation. Qualitative Inquiry, 19, 480-488. doi:10.1177/1077800413482102
6.
De BottonL.PuigvertL.SánchezM. (2005). The inclusion of the other women: Breaking the silence through dialogic learning. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
7.
DelamontS.AtkinsonP. (2009). Gender and research (Four-Volume Set). London, England: SAGE.
8.
DenzinN. K. (1984). On understanding emotion. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
9.
DenzinN. K. (2001). The reflexive interview and a performative social science. Qualitative Research, 1, 23-46. doi:10.1177/146879410100100102
10.
DuttonD.PainterS. (1981). Traumatic bonding: The development of emotional attachment in battered women and other relationships of intermittent abuse. Victimology, 6, 139-155.
11.
DuttonM. A. (1997). La mujer maltratada y sus estrategias de respuesta a la violencia. Función del contexto. In EdlesonJ.EisikovitsZ. (Eds.), Violencia doméstica: La mujer golpeada y la familia [Domestic violence: the battered women and the family] (pp. 153-178). Barcelona, Spain: Granica.
12.
FerraroK. J.JohnsonJ. M. (1983). How women experience battering: The process of victimization. Social Problems, 30, 325-339. doi:10.1525/sp.1983.30.3.03a00080
13.
FlechaA. (2013). Healthier lives for European minority groups: School and health care, lessons from the Roma. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10, 3089-3111. doi:10.3390/ijerph10083089
14.
FlechaA.PulidoC.ChristouM. (2011). Transforming violent selves through reflection in critical communicative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 17, 246-255. doi:10.1177/1077800410397803
15.
FlechaR.PuigvertL.GómezA. (2003). Contemporary sociological theory. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
16.
FugateM.LandisL.RiordanK.NaureckasS.EngelB. (2005). Barriers to domestic violence help seeking: Implications for intervention. Violence Against Women, 11, 290-310. doi:10.1177/1077801204271959
GoodkindJ. R.GillumT. L.BybeeD.SullivanC. M. (2003). The impact of family and friends’ reactions on the well-being of women with abusive partners. Violence Against Women, 9, 347-373. doi:10.1177/1077801202250083
19.
HardingS. (1987). Feminism and methodology: Social science issues. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
20.
HearnJ.NovikovaN.PringleK.ŠmídováI.JyrkinenM.IovanniL.. . . WojtaszekM. (2012). Studying men’s violences: Some key methodological principles in developing a European research framework. Masculinities & Social Change, 2, 82-115. doi:10.4471/MCS.2013.22
21.
LosekeD. R. (1989). Evaluation research and the practice of social-services: A case for qualitative methodology. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 18, 202-223. doi:10.1177/089124189018002006
22.
LosekeD. R. (1999). Thinking about social problems: An introduction to constructionist perspectives. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
23.
LosekeD. R.CahillS. E. (1984). The social construction of deviance: Experts on battered women. Social Problems, 31, 296-310.
24.
MeadG. H. (1934). Mind, self and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
25.
MelgarP. (2009). “Trenquem el silenci”: Superación de las relaciones afectivas y sexuales abusivas por parte de las mujeres víctimas de violencia de género [“Breaking the silence”: Women victims of gender violence overcoming abusive sexual-affective relationships]. Barcelona, Spain: National Research, University of Barcelona.
26.
PiispaM. (2002). Complexity of patterns of violence against women in heterosexual partnerships. Violence Against Women, 8, 873-900. doi:10.1177/107780102400388515
27.
PuigvertL. (2012). The dialogic turn: Dialogue or violence?International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences, 1, 78-96. doi:10.4471/rimcis.2012.04
SordéT.OjalaM. (2010). Actos comunicativos dialógicos y actos comunicativos de poder en la investigación. Revista Signos, 43, 377-391. doi:10.4067/S0718-09342010000400008
30.
SpragueJ. (2005). Feminist methodologies for critical researchers: Bridging differences. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira.
World Health Organization. (2001). Putting women first: Ethical and safety recommendations for research on domestic violence against women. Geneva, Switzerland: Department of Gender and Women’s Health.
