This article troubles the seductive nature of coding based on its potential to fulfill the desires for systematicity, procedure, and clarity. I attempt to explicitly narrate what it is I think I do when I “analyze” data in my empirical work. Building on the notion of promiscuous feminist research, I delineate more explicitly how promiscuity became the hallmark of my inquiry while conducting research at a high-achieving, high-poverty urban school. I also discuss how materiality is entwined with theoretical thinking and explore how a promiscuous deployment of Foucaultian discourse analysis and Critical Race Theory (CRT) helped me to see how race works in schools in a more complicated way than if I had used one or the other framework loyally or prescriptively.
AnzaldúaG. (1999). Borderlands/La Frontera: The New Mestiza. San Francisco, CA: Aunt Lute Press. (Original work published 1987)
2.
BellD. A. (1995). Serving two masters: Integration ideals and client interests in school desegregation litigation. In CrenchshawK.GotandaN.PellerG.ThomasK. (Eds.), Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement (pp. 5-19). New York, NY: New Press.
3.
BennettJ. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
4.
ChildersS. M. (2011). Getting in trouble: Feminist postcritical policy ethnography in an urban school. Qualitative Inquiry, 17, 345-354.
5.
ChildersS. M. (2012). Against simplicity, against ethics: Analytics of disruption as quasi-methodology. Qualitative Inquiry, 18, 752-761.
6.
ChildersS. M. (2013). The materiality of fieldwork. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 599-609.
7.
ChildersS. M.DazaS.RheeJ. (2013). Promiscuous use of feminist methodologies: The dirty theory and messy practice of feminist educational research beyond gender [Special issue]. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 507-523.
8.
ClarkeA. E. (2005). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
9.
CliffordJ.MarcusG. E. (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
10.
ColemanJ. S. (1966). The equality of opportunity study. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
11.
CollinsP. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
12.
Darling-HammondL. (2007). Race, inequality, and educational accountability: The irony of “no child left behind.”Race Ethnicity and Education, 10, 245-260.
13.
FineM.RuglisJ. (2009). Circuits and consequences of dispossession: The racial realignment of the public sphere for U.S. youth. Transforming Anthropology, 17, 20-33.
14.
FoucaultM. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
15.
FoucaultM. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977. New York, NY: Pantheon Books. (Original work published 1972)
16.
FoucaultM. (1990). The history of sexuality: An introduction (Vol. 1, HurleyR., Trans.). New York, NY: Vintage.
17.
GayG. (2007). The rhetoric and reality of NCLB. Race Ethnicity and Education, 10, 279-293.
18.
GilbertL. (2002). Going the distance: “Closeness” in qualitative data analysis software. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 5, 215-228.
19.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (2006). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction. (Original work published 1967)
20.
HekmanS. (2010). The material of knowledge: Feminist disclosures. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
21.
hooksb. (1981). Ain’t I a woman: Black women and feminism. New York, NY: South End Press.
22.
HurshD. (2007). Exacerbating inequality: The failed promise of the no child left behind act. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 10, 295-308.
23.
JacksonA. Y.MazzeiL. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge.
24.
KirbyV.WilsonE. A. (2011). Feminist conversations with Vicki Kirby and Elizabeth A. Wilson. Feminist Theory, 12, 227-234.
25.
KvaleS.BrinkmannS. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
26.
Ladson-BillingsG.TateW. (1995). Toward a critical race theory in education. Teachers College Record, 97, 47-68.
27.
LeonardoZ. (Eds.). (2007). Special issue on no child left behind [Special issue]. Race Ethnicity and Education, 10(3), 241-321.
28.
LewisO. (1959). Five families: Mexican case studies in the culture of poverty. New York, NY: Basic Books.
29.
MaclureM. (2013). Classification or wonder? Coding as an analytic practice in qualitative research. In ColemanB.RingroseJ. (Eds.), Deleuze and research methodologies. (pp. 164-183). Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
30.
MoynihanD. P. (1965). The negro family: The case for national action. Washington, DC: Office of Policy Planning and Research, U.S. Department of Labor.
31.
No Child Left Behind Act, 20 U.S.C. § 6301 (2001).
RavitchD. (1983). The troubled crusade: American education, 1945-1980. New York, NY: Basic Books.
34.
RichardsonL. (2000). Skirting a pleated text: De-disciplining an academic life. In Hesse-BiberS. NLeavyP (Eds.), Emergent Methods in Social Research (pp. 1-11). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
35.
St. PierreE. (2000). Nomadic inquiry in the smooth spaces of the field: A preface. In PierreE.St.PillowW. (Eds.), Working the ruins: Feminist poststructural theory and methods in education. (pp. 1-24). New York: Routledge.
36.
SuttonM.LevinsonB. A. U. (Eds.). (2001). Policy as practice: Toward a comparative sociocultural analysis of educational policy. Westport, CT: Ablex.
37.
TwineF. W.WarrenJ. (Eds.). (2000). Racing research, researching race. New York: New York University Press.
38.
TyackD. B. (1993). Constructing difference: Historical reflections on schooling and social diversity. Teachers College Record, 95, 8-34.
39.
VoithoferR. (2013). Promiscuous feminisms for troubling times. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 524-536.
