Despite the central importance of ethnographic methods to sociological understandings of imprisonment, ethnographies of prison life have tended to evade ideas of “connectedness” between researcher and participant. This arguably underplays the epistemological possibilities of the unique characteristic of participant observation: the presence of the embodied, subjectively perceiving researcher in the field. Using data from English women’s prisons, this article argues that attending to the (inter)subjective dimensions of ethnographic research can bring gains in sociological understanding. The analysis considers moments of disruption in field research, exploring themes of emotion, identity, and power. It focuses particularly on experiences of being positioned and misplaced by prisoners and prison staff, and of negotiating a researcher identity as a gay woman in a field in which sexuality is a pervasive theme. It is suggested that making the self visible in the text offers both substantive insights and a response to some of the dilemmas generated by even marginal participation in a complex field like a prison.
AndersonL. (2006). Analytic Autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35, 373-395.
2.
AtkinsonP.CoffeyA.DelamontS. (2003). Key themes in qualitative research: Continuities and change. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
3.
BarthesR. (1981). Camera Lucida: Reflections on photography. New York, NY: Hill & Wang.
4.
BeharR. (1997). The vulnerable observer: Anthropology that breaks your heart. Boston, MA: Beacon.
5.
Ben-DavidS.SilfenP. (1992). Staff-to-inmate relations in a total institution: A models of five modes of association. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 36, 209-221.
6.
CahillS. E. (1998). Toward a sociology of the person. Sociological Theory, 61, 131-148.
7.
ChambersE. (2000). Applied ethnography. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 851-869). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
8.
CharmazK.MitchellR. G. (1996). The myth of silent authorship: Self, substance and style in ethnographic writing. Symbolic Interaction, 19, 285-302.
9.
CiasulloA. (2008). Containing “deviant” desire: Lesbianism, heterosexuality and the women-in-prison narrative. Journal of Popular Culture, 41, 195-223.
10.
ClemmerD. (1940). The prison community. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
11.
CrawleyE. (2004). Doing prison work: The public and private lives of prison officers. Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing.
12.
CreweB. (2006). Prison drug dealing and the ethnographic lens. The Howard Journal, 45, 347-368.
13.
DaviesC. A. (2008). Reflexive ethnography: A guide to researching selves and others. Second edition. Abingdon: Routledge.
14.
DenzinN. K. (1997). Interpretive ethnography: Ethnographic practices for the 21st century. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
15.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (2000). Epilogue. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Research. Second edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
16.
DrakeD.HarveyJ. (2013). Performing the role of ethnographer: Processing and managing the emotional dimensions of prison research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/13645579.2013.769702
17.
EarleR. (2013). What do ethnographers do in prison? Reflexivity, trialties and error in prison ethnography. Criminal Justice Matters, 91, 18-19.
18.
EinatT.ChenG. (2012). “Female inmates” perspectives toward consensual same-sex relationships in an Israeli prison. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 36, 25-44.
19.
EmersonR. M.FretzR. I.ShawL. L. (2001). Participant observation and fieldnotes. In AtkinsonP.CoffeyA.DelamontS.LoflandJ.LoflandL. (eds.) Handbook of Ethnography. London: Sage.
20.
FarkasM. (2000). A typology of correctional officers. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 44, 431-449.
21.
FreedmanE. (1996). Race, class and the construction of the aggressive female homosexual, 1915-1965. Feminist Studies, 22, 397-423.
22.
GiallombardoR. (1966). Society of women: A study of a women’s prison. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
23.
GoffmanE. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. London, England: Penguin.
24.
GoffmanE. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
25.
GoffmanE. (1971). Relations in public. New York, NY: Basic Books.
26.
GoldR. L. (1958). Roles in sociological fieldwork. Social Forces, 36, 217-223.
27.
GreerK. (2002). Walking an emotional tightrope: Managing emotions in a women’s prison. Symbolic Interaction, 25, 117-139.
28.
HammersleyM.AtkinsonP. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice. Third edition. London, England: Routledge.
29.
HermanD. (2003). “Bad girls changed my life”: Homonormativity in a women’s prison drama. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 20, 141-159.
30.
HoweA. (1994). Punish and critique: Towards a feminist analysis of penalty. London, England: Routledge.
31.
JewkesY. (2012). Autoethnography and emotion as intellectual resources: Doing prison research differently. Qualitative Inquiry, 18, 63-75.
32.
LieblingA. (1999). Doing research in prison: Breaking the silence?Theoretical Criminology, 3, 147-173.
33.
LieblingA. (2000). Prison officers, policing and the use of discretion. Theoretical Criminology, 4, 333-357.
34.
LieblingA. (2001). Whose side are we on? Theory, practice and allegiances in prison research. British Journal of Criminology, 41, 472-484.
35.
LieblingA.PriceD. (2001). The prison officer. Leyhill, UK: Prison Service and Waterside Press.
36.
LincolnY. S.DenzinN. K. (2005). Introduction. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Third edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
37.
MathiesenT. (1965). The defences of the weak. London, England: Tavistock Publications.
38.
MooreJ.JenkinsP. (2012). Coming out’ in therapy? Perceived risks and benefits of self-disclosure of sexual orientation by gay and lesbian therapists to straight clients. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 12, 308-315.
39.
OrneJ. (2011). “You will always have to “out” yourself”: Reconsidering coming out through strategic outness. Sexualities, 14, 681-703.
40.
OtisM. (1913). A perversion not commonly noted. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 8, 113-116.
41.
OwenB. (1998). In the mix: Struggle and survival in a women’s prison. Albany: State University of New York Press.
42.
PrimeauL. A. (2003). Reflections on self in qualitative research: stories of family. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 57, 9-16.
43.
RhodesL. (2001). Toward an anthropology of prisons. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 65-83.
44.
RhodesL. (2012, September 18). Ethnographic imagination in the field of the prison. Paper presented at the “Resisting the eclipse” symposium, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK.
45.
RoweA. (2009). Negotiating disempowerment: Coping and social support in women’s prisons (Unpublished PhD thesis). The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK.
46.
RoweA. (2012). Sexuality, criminality and the women’s prison: Pat Arrowsmith’s “Somewhere like this.”Prison Service Journal, 199, 32-34.
47.
SeveranceT. (2008). The prison lesbian revisited. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 17, 39-57.
