Research interviewing is not just a practice of exchanging data through communication and collection. Rather, the qualitative interview is an active process in which participants and researchers take part in a situated co-construction of meanings and memories. In this article, I argue for viewing memories and the acts of storing, accessing, and telling the past as relational processes in which the researcher’s position shifts from collector to co-constructor. Moving away from seeing participants as “informational commodities” and data as merchandise, I problematize the assumption that participants’ memories may simply be accessed through narratives, which serve as sources of “data.” I suggest that a possible way to gain a complex view on memory and remembering is by focusing on both the told and the untold, the remembered and the forgotten. From this epistemological viewpoint, a narrative focus on the untold and forgotten contributes to the constructive potential of the inquiry process.
AlexanderM. J. (2002). Remembering this bridge, remembering ourselves: Yearning, memory, and desire. In AnzalduaG. E.KeatingA. (Eds.), This bridge we call home: Radical visions for transformation (pp. 81-103). New York, NY: Routledge.
2.
AndersonH. (1997). Conversation, language, and possibilities: A postmodern approach to therapy. New York, NY: Basic Books.
BrinkmannS.KvaleS. (2005). Confronting the ethics of qualitative research. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 18, 157-181.
5.
BrinkmannS.KvaleS. (2008). Ethics in qualitative psychological research. In WilligC.Stainton-RogersW. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 263-279). NY: SAGE.
6.
BrunerJ. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
DeleuzeG. (1988). Foucault. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota. (Original work published in 1986)
8.
DenzinN.LincolnY. S. (Eds.). (2003). The landscape of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
9.
EllingsonL. (2012). Interview as embodied communication. In GubriumJ. F.HolsteinJ. A.MarvastiA. B.McKinneyK. D. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft (2nd ed., pp. 525-541). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
10.
Feyles.M. (2012). Studi per la Fenomenologia della Memoria. Torino, Italy: Franco Angeli.
11.
FisherC. B. (2000). Relational ethics in psychological research: One feminist’s journey. In BrabeckM. M. (Ed.), Practicing feminist ethics in psychology (pp. 125-142). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
12.
FoucaultM. (1990). The use of pleasure: Volume two of the history of sexuality. New York, NY: Vintage. (Original work published 1984)
13.
FrazierL. J. (1999). Subverted memories: Countermourning as political action in Chile. In: BalM.CreweJ.SpitzerL. (Eds.), Acts of memory: Cultural recall in the present (pp. 105-119). Hanover, NH: New England University Press.
14.
FreemanM. (2010). Hindsight: The promise and peril of looking backward. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
15.
GemignaniM. (2011a). “The past if past”: The use of memories and self-healing narratives in refugees from the former Yugoslavia. Journal of Refugee Studies, 24, 132-156.
16.
GemignaniM. (2011b). Between researcher and researched: An introduction to counter-transference in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 17, 701-708.
17.
GergenK. J. (2009). Relational being: Beyond self and community. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
18.
GlasersfeldE. von (1984). An introduction to radical constructivism. In WatzlawickP. (Ed.), The invented reality (pp. 17-40). New York, NY: Norton.
19.
GrbichC. (2004). New approaches in social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
20.
HaydenB. (2006). What’s in a name? The nature of the individual in refugee studies. Journal of Refugee Studies, 19, 471-487.
21.
HolsteinJ. A.GubriumJ. F. (2004). The active interview. In SilvermanD. (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method, and practice (pp. 140-159). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
22.
JosselsonR. (2004). The hermeneutics of faith and the hermeneutics of suspicion. Narrative Inquiry, 14, 1-29.
23.
KellyG. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. New York, NY: Norton.
24.
KralM. J. (2014). The Relational Motif in Participatory Qualitative Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 20
25.
LippkeL.TanggaardL. (2014). Leaning in to “Muddy” Interviews. Qualitative Inquiry, 20
26.
KvaleS.BrinkmannS. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
MalkkiL. H. (1995). Refugees and exile: From “refugee studies” to the national order of things. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 495-523.
29.
MalkkiL. H. (1997). National geographic: The rooting of peoples and the territorialization of national identity among scholars and refugees. In GuptaA.FergusonJ. (Eds.), Culture, power, place: Explorations in critical anthropology (pp. 52-74). Los Angeles: University of California Press.
30.
OlickJ. K. (2007). From usable pasts to the return of the repressed. The Hedgehog Review, 9, 19-31.
31.
ParkerI. (2005). Qualitative psychology: Introducing radical research. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
32.
PascaleC.-M. (2011). Epistemology and the politics of knowledge. The Sociological Review, 58, 154-165.
33.
PotterJ.HepburnA. (2012). Eight challenges for interview researchers. In GubriumJ. F.HolsteinJ. A.MarvastiA. B.McKinneyK. D. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft (pp. 555-571). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
34.
RichardsonL. (1998). The politics of location: Where am I now?Qualitative Inquiry, 4, 41-48.
35.
RicoeurP. (1974). The conflict of interpretations: Essays in hermeneutics. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. (Original work published 1969).
36.
RiessmanC. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
37.
SchostakJ. (2006). Interviewing and representation in qualitative research. New York, NY: Open University Press.
38.
VanburkleoS. F. (2008). Part II: Remembering and Forgetting. In GarrettM.GottfriedH.VanburkleoS. F. (Eds.), Remapping the humanities: Identity, community, memory, (post)modernity (pp. 73-77). Detroit, MI: Wayne University Press.
39.
WhiteM.EpstonD. (1990). Narrative means to therapeutic ends. New York, NY: Norton.
