Despite that qualitative researchers have persistently positioned research as a collaborative endeavor, single-authorship is ultimately valued in the academy, producing tension between the expectation and (im)possibility of such single-authorship. In this article, we demonstrate how we attend to this tension by focusing on how our citational practices within the text and in authorship bylines enable us to continuously interrogate and deconstruct how the author functions in our work. Specifically, we describe how our writing partnership produces each other as secondary sources for all of our writing, and we explore how American Psychological Association’s (APA) phrase “as cited in” helps us do authorship differently, even in those texts where our contributions are not acknowledged in authorship bylines. This exploration highlights how writing and methodology are completely imbricated in qualitative research, so we propose that choices about how we produce the author should be as philosophically informed as other methodological decisions.
American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
BakerB.HeyningK. (Eds.). (2004). Dangerous coagulations? The uses of Foucault in the study of education (Eruptions, V. 19). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
3.
BaudrillardJ. (1988). Simulacra and simulations. In PosterM. (Ed.), Jean Baudrillard: Selected writings (pp. 169-187). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
4.
Bridges-RhoadsS. (2011). Pursuing responsibility: Writing and citing poststructural qualitative inquiry, social justice, and Christianity (Master’s thesis). Available from ProQuest Digital Dissertation and Theses Database. (Accession No. gua3929452)
5.
Bridges-RhoadsS. (2012). Writing texts that enable methodological and ethical uncertainties: Composite characters as lines of flight. Urbana-Champaign, IL: International Congress of Qualitative Inquiry.
6.
ButlerJ. (1993). Poststructuralism and postmarxism. Diacritics, 23, 3-11.
7.
ButlerJ. (2004). Jacques Derrida. London Review of Books, 26, 32.
8.
CaputoJ. (1987). Radical hermeneutics: Repetition, deconstruction, and the hermeneutic project. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press
9.
DaviesB. (2000). A body of writing: 1990-1999. Walnut Creek, CA: AlfaMira Press.
10.
DeleuzeG. (1995). Negotiations: 1972-1990 (JoughinM., Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1990).
11.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1980)
12.
DerridaJ. (1974). Of grammatology (SpivakG., Trans.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. (Original work published 1967)
13.
DerridaJ. (1978). Freud and the scene of writing. In BassA. (Trans.), Writing and difference (pp. 196-231). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14.
DerridaJ. (1982). Signature event context. In BassA. (Trans.), Margins of philosophy (pp. 307-330). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1971)
15.
DerridaJ. (2001). A certain madness must watch over thinking: Refusing to build a philosophical system, Derrida privileges experience and writes out of “compulsion.” A dialogue around traces and deconstructions. In BiestaG.Egea-KuehneD. (Eds.), Derrida and education (pp. 55-76). New York, NY: Routledge. (Original work published 1991)
16.
FoucaultM. (1977a). Nietzsche, genealogy, history. In BouchardD. (Ed.), Language, countermemory, practice: Selected essays and interviews by Michel Foucault (pp. 139-164). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
17.
FoucaultM. (1977b). What is an author? In BouchardD. (Ed.), Language counter-memory, and practice: Selected essays and interviews (pp. 113-138). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. (Original work published 1969)
18.
FoucaultM. (1978). The history of sexuality: An introduction, Volume I (HurleyR., Trans.). New York, NY: Vintage Books. (Original work published 1976)
19.
FoucaultM. (1982). The subject and power. In DreyfusH.RabinowP. (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 208-226). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
20.
FoucaultM. (1988). An aesthetics of existence, interview with Alessandro Fontana. In KristzmanL. (Ed.), Politics, philosophy, culture: interviews and other writings, 1977-1984 (pp. 47-56). New York, NY: Routledge. (Original work published 1984)
21.
FoucaultM. (1996). The masked philosopher. In LotringerS. (Ed.), Foucault live (Interviews, 1961-1984) (pp. 302-312). New York, NY: Semiotext(e). (Original work published 1980)
22.
FoucaultM.DeleuzeG. (1972). Intellectuals and power: A conversation between Michel Foucault and Gilles Deleuze. L’Arc, 49, 3-10.
23.
FreemanM.deMarraisK.PreissleJ.RoulstonK.St. PierreE. (2007). Standards of evidence in qualitative research: An incitement to discourse. Educational Researcher, 36, 25-32.
24.
GaleK.WyattJ. (2006). Inquiring into writing: An interactive interview. Qualitative Inquiry, 12, 1117-1134.
25.
GaleK.WyattJ. (2007). Writing the incalculable: A second interactive inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 13, 787-807.
26.
HafernikJ.MesserschmittD.VandrickS. (1997). Collaborative research: Why and how?Educational Researcher, 26, 31-35.
27.
HolbrookT.HundleyM. (2012, April). Late to the eParty? Academics and the reshaping of author/ity. Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
28.
HoodJ. (1985). The lone scholar myth. In FoxM. F. (Ed.), Scholarly writing and publishing: Issues, problems, and solutions (pp. 111-125). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
29.
Koro-LjungbergM. (2010). Validity, responsibility, and aporia. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 603-610.
30.
LatherP. (2006). Paradigm proliferation as a good thing to think with: Teaching research in education as a wild profusion. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19, 35-57.
31.
McWilliamE. (1997). Performing between the posts: Authority, posture. and contemporary feminist scholarship. In TierneyW.LincolnY. (Eds.), Representation and the text: Reframing the narrative voice (pp. 219-232). New York: State University of New York Press.
32.
PascaleC.-M. (2011). Cartographies of knowledge: Exploring qualitative epistemologies. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
33.
PosterM. (1988). Introduction. In PosterM. (Ed.), Jean Baudrillard: Selected writings (pp. 1-12). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
34.
RichardsonL.St. PierreE. A. (2005). Writing: A method of inquiry. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 959-978). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
35.
RitchieS.RiganoD. (2007). Solidarity through collaborative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20, 129-150.
36.
SpeedyJ.BaintonD.BridgesN.BrownT.BrownL.MartinV. . . . WilsonS. (2010). Encountering “Gerald”: Experiments with meandering methodologies and experiences beyond our “selves” in a collaborative writing group. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 894-901.
37.
SpivakG. C. (1974). Preface. In DerridaJ. (Ed.), Of grammatology (SpivakG. C., Trans., pp. ix-xc). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
38.
St. PierreE. A. (1997). Methodology in the Fold and the irruption of transgressive data. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 10, 175-189.
39.
St. PierreE. A. (2004). Care of the self: The subject and freedom. In BakerB.HeynigK. (Eds.), Dangerous coagulations? The uses of Foucault in the study of education (Eruptions, V. 19) (pp. 325-358). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
40.
St. PierreE. A. (2011). Post qualitative research: The critique and the coming after. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 611-626). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
41.
St. PierreE. A. (2012). Another postmodern report on knowledge: Positivism and its others. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 15, 483-503.
42.
TamboukouM.BallS. (2003). Genealogy and ethnography: Fruitful encounters or dangerous liaisons? In TamboukouM.BallS. (Eds.), Dangerous encounters: Genealogy and ethnography (pp. 1-36). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
43.
Van CleaveJ. (2012). Scientifically based research as a regime of truth: An analysis using Foucault’s genealogy and governmentality (Master’s thesis). Available from ProQuest Digital Dissertation and Theses Database. (Accession No. gua4088456)
44.
Van CleaveJ.Bridges-RhoadsS. (2012, April). Troubling the single-authored dissertation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
45.
WyattJ.GaleK.GannonS.DaviesB. (2010). Deleuzian thought and collaborative writing: A play in four acts. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 730-741.
