In this dialogue one actor (“the interlocutor”) questions another (“the funster”) about his claim to have been and to be still lost in the funhouse. The funhouse is used as a metaphor for the universities in which the funster has studied or worked throughout his career. The funster claims that the dialogue provides a brief life-story that he admits is both a faction of verifiable life-facts and a fiction of imagined life-fables. The funhouse is described as the main location in which the lost funster struggles to find or create his own identity. In the final part of the dialogue, the funster concludes that it was when he concentrated on improving his own writing and that of his students that he had, and is having, his best time ever in the funhouse, lost or found.
BadleyG. (2009a). A place from where to speak: The university and academic freedom. British Journal of Educational Studies, 57(2), 146-163.
5.
BadleyG. (2009b). Academic writing as shaping and re-shaping. Teaching in Higher Education, 14, 209-219.
6.
BadleyG. (2010). Valuing essays: Essaying values. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 15(1), 103-115.
7.
BadleyG. (2011). Academic writing: A frivolous approach?Teaching in Higher Education, 16, 255-266.
8.
BadleyG. (2012). Six characters in search of an author: A qualitative comedy in the making. Qualitative Inquiry. Online publication. doi:10.1177/1077800411425332/qix.sagepub.com
9.
BarnettR. (2003). Beyond all reason: Living with ideology in the university. Buckingham, UK: SRHE & Open University Press.
10.
BarnettR.GriffinA. (Eds.). (1997). The end of knowledge in higher education. London, UK: Cassell.
11.
BarthJ. (1968/1972). Lost in the funhouse. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.
12.
BeckerH. (1998). Tricks of the trade. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
13.
BensonL.HarkavyIPuckettJ. (2007). Dewey’s dream. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
DeweyJ. (1910/1991). How we think. New York, NY: Prometheus Books.
20.
DeweyJ. (1916). Democracy and education. New York, NY: Macmillan.
21.
IserW. (1978). The act of reading. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
22.
IvaniĉR. (1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
23.
KnobeJ. (1995). A talent for bricolage: An interview with Richard Rorty. Dualist, 2, 56-71.
24.
LogueC. (2011, December5). Obituary. The Guardian, p. 34.
25.
MackayJ. (2008). Doris Lessing. Paper presented at “Literature Live.”, Lincoln, UK.
26.
ManguelA. (2011). A reader on reading. London, UK: Yale University Press.
27.
MuirE. (1993). An autobiography. Edinburgh, UK: Canongate Press.
28.
MyersonG. (1997). A new university space: A dialogue on argument, democracy, and the university. In BarnettR.GriffinS. (Eds.), The end of knowledge in higher education (pp. 139-150). London, UK: Cassell.
29.
RortyR. (1990). The dangers of over-philosophication—Reply to Arcilla and Nicholson. Educational Theory, 40(1), 41-44.
30.
RortyR. (1991). Essays on Heidegger and others. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31.
RortyR. (1998). Achieving our country. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32.
RortyR. (2007). Philosophy as cultural politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33.
ScullyJ. (Ed.). (1966). Modern poets on modern poetry. London, UK: Collins.
34.
ShumarW. (1997). College for sale: A critique of the commodification of higher education. London, UK: The Falmer Press.
35.
SoperK. (1997). Realism, postmodernism and cultural values. In BarnettR.GriffinS. (Eds.), The end of knowledge in higher education. (pp. 39-51).London, UK: Cassell.
36.
SparkesA. (1991). Talking philosophy: A wordbook. London, UK: Routledge.
37.
SwordH. (2009). Writing higher education differently: A manifesto on style. Studies in Higher Education, 34, 319-336.
38.
SwordH. (2012). Stylish academic writing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39.
ThoreauH. D. (1854/1995). Walden; or, life in the woods. New York, NY: Dover Publications.
40.
ZinsserW. (2006). On writing well. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
