Despite the psychically toxic nature of shame, it has historically been under-researched and under-theorized. However, a recent burgeoning of literature has brought an increasing awareness of shame as a pathogenic force. An investigation of this noxious affect is especially pertinent in the context of feminist qualitative research. The authors consider the significant effect of shame on a specific dialogue that unfolded with a female survivor of rape in Cape Town. The analysis tracks the ubiquitous manifestations of shame between researcher and researched and reveals how shame was unavoidably generated, exacerbated, and maintained within the intersubjective field. What is highlighted is a need to reflexively locate the emotion within the racialized, gendered, and institutionalized relationships. Such a consideration would arguably provide invaluable insights for psychological research and practice as it pays critical attention to positionality, reflexivity, and the power relationships inherent in the production of knowledge.
AltmanN. (2000). Black and white thinking: A psychoanalyst reconsiders race. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 10, 589.
2.
AltmanN. (2004). Whiteness uncovered: Commentary on papers by Melanie Suchet and Gillian Straker. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 14, 439-446.
3.
American Psychological Association. (2003). Guidelines on multicultural education, training, research, practice, and organizational change for psychologists. American Psychologist, 58, 377-402.
4.
ArtzL. (1999). Violence against women in rural Southern Cape: Exploring access to justice within a feminist jurisprudence framework. Unpublished masters thesis, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
5.
AtwoodG. E.OrangeD. M.StolorowR. D. (2002). Shattered worlds, psychotic states: A post-Cartesian view of the experience of personal annihilation. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 19, 281-306.
6.
AtwoodG. E.StolorowR. D. (1984). Structures of subjectivity: Explorations of psychoanalytic phenomenology. Vol. 4: Psychoanalytic inquiry book series. Hillsdale NJ: The Analytic Press.
7.
BennettJ. (2000). The politics of writing. Agenda, 46, 3-12.
BodnarS. (2004). Remember where you came from: Dissociative process in multicultural individuals. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 14, 581-603.
10.
BroucekF. J. (1991). Shame and the self. New York, NY: Guilford.
11.
BuirskiP. (2005). Practising intersubjectively. New York, NY: Jason Aranson.
12.
BurmanE. (2003). From difference to intersectionality: Challenges and resources. European Journal of Psychotherapy, Counselling & Health, 6, 293-308.
13.
BurmanE. (2004). Taking women’s voices: The psychological politics of feminisation. Psychology of Women Section Review, 6, 3-21.
14.
BurmanE. (2006). Emotions and reflexivity in feminised education action research. Educational Action Research, 14, 315-322.
15.
BurmanE.ChantlerK. (2004). There’s no place like home: Emotional geographies of researching “race” and refuge provision in Britain. Gender, Place and Culture, 11, 375-397.
16.
BurmanE.ChantlerK. (2005). Domestic violence and minoritisation: Legal and policy barriers facing minoritised women leaving violent relationships. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 28, 59-74.
17.
BurnsM. (2003). Interviewing: Embodied communication. Feminism and Psychology, 13, 229-236.
18.
ButlerJ. (2003). Violence, mourning, politics. Studies in Gender and Sexuality, 4, 9-37.
19.
ChisalaS. (2008). Rape and HIV/AIDS: Who’s protecting whom? In ArtzL.SmytheD. (Eds.), Should we consent: Rape Law reform in South Africa (pp. 52-71). Cape Town, South Africa: Juta.
20.
CushmanP. (2000). White guilt, political activity and the analyst: Commentary on the paper by Neil Altman. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 10, 607-618.
21.
De HoogeI. E.BruegelmansS. M.ZeelenbergM. (2008). Not so ugly after all: When shame acts as a commitment device. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 933-943.
22.
de la ReyC. (1997). South African feminism, race and racism. Agenda, 32, 6-10.
23.
DiefenbachT. (2009). Are case studies more than sophisticated storytelling?: Methodological problems of qualitative empirical research mainly based on semi-structured interviews. Quality & Quantity, 43, 875-894.
24.
DoucetA. (2008). From her side of the Gossamer wall(s): Reflexivity and relational knowing. Qualitative Sociology, 31, 73-87.
25.
Du MontJ.StermacL. (1996). Research with women who have been sexually assaulted: Examining informed consent. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 5, 185-191.
26.
ExlineR. V.WintersL. C. (1965). Affective relations and mutual glances in dyads. In TomkinsS.IzardC. (Eds.), Affect, cognition, & personality (pp. 319-351). New York, NY: Springer.
27.
FinlayL. (2002). “Outing” the researcher: The provenance, process and practise of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 12, 531-545.
28.
FlaxJ. (2004). What is the subject? Review essay on psychoanalysis and feminism in postcolonial time. Signs, 905-923.
29.
FoucaultM. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8, 775-795.
30.
GaveyN. (2005). Just sex? The cultural scaffolding of rape. London: Routledge.
31.
GilbertP. (1997). The evolution of social attractiveness and its role in shame, humiliation, guilt and therapy. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 70, 113-147.
32.
GilbertP. (1998). What is shame? Some core issues and controversies. In GilbertP.AndrewsB. (Eds.), Shame, interpersonal behavior, psychopathology and culture (pp. 3-38). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
33.
GilbertP. (2002). Body shame: A biopsychosocial conceptualisation and overview with treatment implications. In GilbertP.MilesJ. (Eds.), Body shame: Conceptualization, research and treatment (pp. 3-55). New York, NY: Routledge.
34.
GrayB. (2008). Putting emotion and reflexivity to work in researching migration. Sociology, 42, 935-942.
35.
GuimaraesE. (2007). Feminist research practise: Using conversation analysis to explore the researcher’s interaction with participants. Feminism and Psychology, 17, 149-161.
36.
HarrisA. (2000). Haunted talk, healing action: Commentary on paper by Kimberlyn Leary. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 10, 655-662.
37.
HengeholdL. (2000). Remapping the event: Institutional discourses and the trauma of rape. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 26, 189-212.
38.
HermanJ. (1992). Trauma and recovery. London: Pandora.
39.
HollwayW. (1989). Subjectivity and method in psychology: Gender, meaning and science. London: SAGE.
40.
HookD. (2004). Foucault, disciplinary power and the critical pre-history of psychology. In HookD. (Ed.), Critical psychology (pp. 210-238). Cape Town, South Africa: UCT Press.
41.
HorneyK. (1950). Neurosis and human growth: The struggle towards self-realization. New York, NY: Norton.
42.
JaenickeC. (2008). The risk of relatedness: Intersubjectivity theory in clinical practise. Lanham, MD: Jason Aranson.
43.
JensenT. (2008). “Speaking as a mother”: Notes on becoming a researcher and not getting onto supernanny. Feminism and Psychology, 18, 384-388.
44.
KaufmanG. (1989). The psychology of shame: Theory and treatment of shame-based syndromes. London: Routledge.
45.
KiguwaP. (2004). Feminist critical psychology in South Africa. In HookD. (Ed.), Critical Psychology (pp. 278-315). Cape Town: UCT Press.
46.
KohutH. (1966). Forms and transformations of narcissism. Journal of American Psychoanalytic Assn, 14, 243-272.
47.
KometsiK. (2001). Multi-racial clinical settings and the counter-transferential feelings of a black clinical psychologist. Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy in South Africa, 9, 11-21.
48.
KossM. (2000). Blame, shame and community: Justice responses to violence against women. American Psychologist, 53, 1332-1343.
49.
KvaleS. (1996). Interviews: An Introduction to qualitative research interviewing. London: SAGE.
50.
LanghoutR. (2006). Where am I? Locating myself and its implications for collaborative research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 37, 267-274.
51.
LeeD. A.ScraggP.TurnerS. (2001). The role of shame and guilt in traumatic events: A clinical model of shame-based and guilt-based PTSD. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 74, 451-466.
52.
LevettA. (1994). Problems of cultural imperialism in the study of childhood sexual abuse. In DawesA.DonaldD. (Eds.), Childhood and adversity: psychological perspectives from South African research (pp. 240-260). Cape Town: David Philip.
53.
MamaA. (1995). Beyond the masks: Race, gender and subjectivity. London: Routledge.
54.
MamaA. (2007). Is it ethical to study Africa? Preliminary thoughts on scholarship and freedom. African Studies Review, 50, 1-26.
55.
MatosM.Pinto-GouveiaJ. (2010). Shame as a traumatic memory. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 17, 299-312.
56.
MawA.WomersleyG.O’SullivanM. (2008). The psycho-social impact of rape and its implications for expert evidence in rape trials. In ArtzL.SmytheD. (Eds.), Should we consent: Rape law reform in South Africa (pp. 121-143). Cape Town, South Africa: Juta.
57.
MillerS. (1993). The shame experience. London: The Analytic Press.
58.
MorrisonA. P. (1989). Shame, the underside of narcissism. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
59.
MorrisonA. P. (1998). The culture of shame. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
60.
MotseiM. (2007). The Kanga and the kangaroo court: Reflections on the rape trial of Jacob Zuma. Cape Town, South Africa: Jacana Media.
61.
OrangeD. M. (1995). Emotional understanding: Studies in psychoanalytic epistemology. New York, NY: Guilford.
62.
OrangeD. M.AtwoodG. E.StolorowR. D. (1997). Working intersubjectively: Contextualism in psychoanalytic practice. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
63.
OwensE. (2006). Conversational space and participant shame in interviewing. Qualitative Inquiry, 12, 1160-1179.
64.
PitheyB. (2008). The personal is the political: Disclosure of rape survivor’s personal records. In ArtzL.SmytheD. (Eds.), Should we consent: Rape law reform in South Africa (pp. 99-120). Cape Town, South Africa: Juta.
65.
PonterottoJ. G. (2010). Qualitative research in multicultural psychology: Philosophical underpinnings, popular approaches, and ethical considerations. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 16, 581-589.
66.
PoselD. (2005a). The scandal of manhood: “Baby rape” and the politicization of sexual violence in post-apartheid South Africa. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 7, 239-252.
67.
PoselD. (2005b). Sex, death and the fate of the nation: Reflections on the politicization of sexuality in post-apartheid South Africa. Africa, 75, 125-153.
68.
RiceC. (2009). Imagining the other? Ethical challenges of researching and writing women’s embodied lives. Feminism and Psychology, 19, 245-266.
69.
SteynE.SteynJ. (2008). Revictimisation of rape victims by the South African Police Service. Acta Criminol, 21, 41-60.
70.
StolorowR. D.AtwoodG. E.OrangeD. M. (1999). Kohut and contextualism: Towards a post-Cartesian psychoanalytic therapy. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 16, 380-388.
71.
SultanaF. (2007). Reflexivity, positionality and participatory ethics: Negotiating fieldwork dilemmas in international research. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 6, 375-385.
SwartzS. (2007). The power to name: South African intersubjective psychoanalytic psychotherapy and the negotiation of racialised histories. European Journal of Psychotherapy and Counselling, 9, 177-190.
74.
TangneyJ. P.DearingR. L. (2002). Shame and guilt. New York, NY: Guilford.
75.
UssherJ. M. (2006). Managing the monstrous feminine: Regulating the reproductive body. New York, NY: Routledge.
