The article interrogates the notion of “the ruins” and its cognates (rupture, loss, failure, etc.) as productively destructive figures for postfoundational methodology and wonders how much damage has actually been done. Hoping for ruins, have scholars merely produced a picturesque gloss on the same old Enlightenment edifice? The author finds some promise in Deleuze’s notion of the stutter, using this to look at what happens when the body surfaces in language. The author suggests that attention to the bodily entanglements of language, which qualitative method generally prefers to forget, can be put to work to perform a particular form of productive ruin commended by Deleuze—namely, the ruin of representation.
DeleuzeG. (1994a). Difference and repetition (PattonP., Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
14.
DeleuzeG. (1994b). He stuttered. In BoundasC. V.OlkowskiD. (Eds.), Gilles Deleuze and the theater of philosophy (pp. 23-29). London: Routledge.
15.
DeleuzeG. (2004). The logic of sense (BoundasC. V.LesterM.StivaleC., Trans.). London: Continuum.
16.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1987). A thousand plateaus (MassumiB., Trans.) London: Continuum.
17.
DerridaJ. (1978). Structure, sign and play in the discourse of the human sciences. In Writing and Difference (BassA., Trans., pp. 278-294). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
18.
DerridaJ. (1981). Spurs: Nietzsche’s styles/Eperons: Les styles de Nietzsche (HarlowB., Trans.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
19.
DerridaJ. (1994). Specters of Marx, the state of the debt, the work of mourning and the new international (KamufP., Trans.). London: Routledge.
20.
FullerG. (2000). The textual politics of good intentions: Critical theory and semiotics. In PoyntonC.LeeA. (Eds.), Language, culture and text: Discourse and methodology in social research and cultural studies (pp. 81-98). Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
21.
GatesH. L.Jr. (1988). The signifying monkey. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
22.
GreenblattS. (1991). Marvelous possessions: The wonder of the New World. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
23.
GroszE. (1994). Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
24.
HarawayD. (1991). A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature (pp. 149-181). London: Routledge.
25.
HarawayD. (1992). Ecce homo, ain’t (ar’n’t) I a woman, and inappropriate/d others: The human in a post-humanist landscape. In ButlerJ.ScottJ. W. (Eds.), Feminists theorize the political (pp. 86-100). London: Routledge.
26.
JenksC. (1995). Watching your step: The history and practice of the flaneur. In JenksC. (Ed.), Visual culture (pp. 142-160). London: Routledge.
27.
JonesA.JenkinsK. (2008). Indigenous discourse and “the material”: A post-interpretivist argument. International Review of Qualitative Research, 1(2), 125-144.
28.
KimH. (2007). The parched tongue. In CloughP. THalleyJ. (Eds.). The affective turn: Theorizing the social (pp. 34-46). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
29.
KirbyV. (1997). Telling flesh: Substance of the corporeal. London: Routledge.
30.
KraussR. (1993). The optical unconscious. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31.
KristevaJ. (1982). Powers of horror: An essay on abjection (RoudiezL. S., Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
32.
LatherP. (1996). Troubling clarity: The politics of accessible language. Harvard Educational Review, 66(3), 525-545.
33.
LatherP. (1997). Drawing the line at angels: Working the ruins of feminist ethnography. Qualitative Studies in Education, 10(3), 285-304.
34.
LatherP. (1998). Critical pedagogy and its complicities: A praxis of stuck places. Educational Theory, 48, 487-498.
35.
LatherP. (2010, July23). The state of qualitative inquiry: Methodology-2.1. Keynote presentation to the Summer Institute in Qualitative Research, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
36.
LyotardJ.-F. (1992). Gloss on resistance. In The postmodern explained to children: Correspondence 1982-1985 (PefanisJ.ThomasM., Trans.). London: Turnaround.
37.
MacLureM. (2003). Discourse in educational and social research. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
38.
MacLureM. (2006). The bone in the throat: Some uncertain thoughts on baroque method. Qualitative Studies in Education, 19(6), 729-745.
39.
MacLureM. (2009). Broken voices, dirty words: On the productive insufficiency of voice. In JacksonA. Y.MazzeiL. A. (Eds.), Voice in qualitative inquiry: Challenging conventional, interpretive and critical conceptions in qualitative research (pp 97-113). London: Routledge.
40.
MacLureM. (2010). The offence of theory. Journal of Education Policy, 25(2), 277-286.
41.
MacLureM.HolmesR.JonesE.MacRaeC. (2010). Silence as resistance to analysis. Or, on not opening one’s mouth properly. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 492-500.
42.
MacLureM.HolmesR.MacRaeC.JonesL. (2010). Animating classroom ethnography; Overcoming video fear. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(5), 543-556.
43.
MacLureM.JonesL.HolmesR.MacRaeC. (in press). Becoming a problem: Behaviour and reputation in the early years classroom. British Educational Research Journal. Published online on iFirst. Retrieved June 24, 2011, DOI: 10.1080/01411926.2011.55270910.1080/01411926.2011.552709
44.
MaurièsP. (2002). Cabinets of curiosities. London: Thames & Hudson.
45.
McLarenP. (1995). Gangsta pedagogy and ghettoethnicity: The hip-hop nation as counterpublic sphere. Socialist Review, 25(2), 9-56.
46.
MillerD. A. (1988). The novel and the police. Berkeley: University of California Press.
47.
MassumiB. (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
48.
OlkowskiD. (1999). Gilles Deleuze and the ruins of representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
49.
Rambo RonaiC. (1998). Sketching with Derrida: An ethnography of a researcher/exotic dancer. Qualitative Inquiry, 4(3), 405-21.
50.
St. PierreE. A. (2000). The call for intelligibility in postmodern educational research. Educational Researcher, 29(5), 25-28.
51.
St. PierreE. A. (2004). Refusing alternatives: A science of contestation. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(1), 130-139.
52.
St. PierreE. A.PillowW. (Eds.). (2000). Working the ruins: Feminist poststructural theory and methods in education. London: Routledge.
53.
StronachI.MacLureM. (1997). Educational research undone: The postmodern embrace. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
54.
TaussigM. (1993). Mimesis and alterity. London: Routledge.
VisweswaranK. (1994). Fictions of feminist ethnography. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
57.
YoungM. F. D. (2000). Rescuing the sociology of educational knowledge from the extremes of voice discourse: Towards a new theoretical basis for the sociology of education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21(4), 523-536.
