Interviews with political or organizational elites often constitute a valuable source of knowledge about organizational culture, values, and strategies. However, such interviews often confront the researcher with either reluctant or control-seeking respondents, especially for sensitive issues such as human rights and ethnic discrimination, issues that may involve strong emotions. Drawing inspiration from a qualitative methodology focusing on resistance and power, the article argues that in such situations, the interviewer needs to integrate both dialogic and agonistic interview methodologies through phronesis, Aristotle’s concept of practical rationality. A phronetic approach, involving reflections on the link between reason and emotions, is well suited for handling both dialogue and confrontation in the interview process. Empirically, the article draws on interviews with representatives of trade unions and employer organizations on the subject of human rights and ethnic discrimination in the Danish labor market.
Aberbach, J.D., & Rockman, B.A. ( 2002). Conducting and coding elite interviews. Political Science and Politics, 35, 673-676.
2.
Abizadeh, A. ( 2008). The passions of the wise: Phronesis, rhetoric and Aristotle’s passionate practical deliberation. In R. Kings-ton & L. Ferry (Eds.), Bringing the passions back in. Emotions in political philosophy (pp. 60-77). Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: UBC Press.
3.
Adler, P.A., & Adler, P. ( 2002). The reluctant respondent. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research (pp. 515-535). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
4.
American Sociological Association. (1999). Code of ethics and policies and procedures. Retrieved from http://www.asanet.org/images/asa/docs/pdf/CodeofEthics.pdf
5.
Aristotle. (2009). The Nicomachean ethic (D. Ross, Trans.; revised with an introduction and notes by L. Brown, Ed.) Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
6.
Brannen, J. ( 1988). Research note. The study of sensitive subjects. Sociological Review, 36, 552-563.
Duncombe, J., & Jessop, J. ( 2002): "Doing rapport" and the ethics of "faking friendship." In M. Mauthner, M. Birch, J. Jessop, & T. Miller (Eds.), Ethics in qualitative research (pp. 107-121) London, UK: SAGE.
9.
Engelstad, F. ( 2009). Democratic elitism-Conflict and consensus. Comparative Sociology, 8, 383-401.
10.
Flyvbjerg, B. ( 2001). Making social science matter. Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Flyvbjerg, B. ( 2006a). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12, 219-245.
12.
Flyvbjerg, B. ( 2006b). Making organization research matter: Power, values and phronesis. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence , & W. R. Nord (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organization studies (pp. 370-387). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
13.
Gadamer, H.G. ( 2004). Truth and method (3rd ed.) London, UK: Continuum.
14.
Gamson, J. ( 1995). Stopping the spin and becoming a prop: Field work on Holywood elites. In R. Hertz & J. B. Imber (Eds.), Studying elites using qualitative methods (pp. 83-93). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
15.
Hochschild, A.R. ( 1998): The sociology of emotion as a way of seeing. In G. Bendelow & S. J. Williams (Eds.), Emotions in social life: Critical themes and contemporary issues (pp. 3-15). London, UK: Routledge.
16.
Holstein, J.A., & Gubrium, J.F. ( 1995). The active interview. London, UK: SAGE.
17.
Hursthouse, R. ( 2006). The central doctrine of the mean. In R. Kraut (Ed.), The Blackwell guide to Aristotle’s Nicomachean ethics (pp. 96-115). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
18.
Kristjánsson, K. ( 2007). Aristotle, emotions, and education. Alder-shot, UK: Ashgate.
19.
Kvale, S. ( 2006). Dominance through interviews and dialogues. Qualitative Inquiry, 12, 480-500.
20.
Leighton, S.R. ( 1996). Aristotle on the emotions. In A. O. Rorty (Ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s rhetoric (pp. 206-237). Berkeley: University of California Press.
21.
Lilleker, D.G. ( 2003). Interviewing the political elite: Navigating a potential minefield. Politics, 23, 207-214.
22.
Nussbaum, M.C. ( 1996): Aristotle on emotions and rational persuasion. In A. O. Rorty (Ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s rhetoric (pp. 303-323). Berkeley: University of California Press.
23.
Odendahl, T. & Shaw, A.M. ( 2001): "Interviewing Elites". In: J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.): Handbook of Interview Research (pp. 299-316). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
24.
Ostrander, S.A. ( 1995). "Surely you’re not in this just to be helpful": Access, rapport, and interviews in three studies of elites. In R. Hertz & J. B. Imber (Eds.), Studying elites using qualitative methods (pp. 133-150). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
25.
Ruddin, L.P. ( 2006). You can generalize stupid! Social scientists, bent Flyvbjerg, and case study methodology. Qualitative Inquiry, 12, 797-812.
26.
Schram, S., & Caterino, B. ( 2006). Making political science matter. Debating knowledge, research, and method. New York, NY: New York University Press.
27.
Seidman, I. ( 2006). Interviewing as qualitative research. A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press .
28.
Tanggaard, L. ( 2007). The research interview as discourses crossing swords . Qualitative Inquiry, 13, 160-176.
29.
Thomas, G. ( 2010). Doing case study: Abduction not induction, phronesis not theory. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 575-582.
30.
Thuesen, F. ( 2008). Menneskerettigheder & solidaritet: et studium med fokus på arbejdsmarkedet [Human rights and solidarity: A study focussing on the labor market] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
31.
Thuesen, F.(Human) rights and solidarity. Restructuring the national welfare space. In M. R. Madsen & G. Verschraegen (Eds.), Sociology of human rights. Forthcoming.
32.
Vitus, K. ( 2008). The agonistic approach. Reframing resistance in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 14, 466-488.
33.
Wengraf, T. ( 2001). Qualitative research interviewing. London, UK: SAGE.
34.
Wrench, J. ( 2004). Trade union responses to immigrants and ethnic inequality in Denmark and the UK: The context of consensus and conflict. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 10, 7-30.
