In questioning conventional qualitative research methods, St. Pierre asked, “What else might writing do except mean?” The author answers, it oppresses. Co-opting the race traitor figurative, she calls on qualitative researchers to become “ability traitors” who interrogate how a valuable coinage of their trade—the written word—is used to rank and categorize individuals with troubling effects. In this article, she commits three betrayals: (a) multigenre writing that undermines the authoritative text; (b) assemblage as a method of analysis that deprivileges the written word; and(c) a gesture toward a dis/ comfort text intended to take up Lather’s example of challenging the “usual ways of making sense”. In committing these betrayals, the author articulates her “traitorous agenda” designed to interrogate assumptions about inquiry, power, equity, and writing as practice-as-usual.
Baglieri, S., & Knopf, J.H. ( 2004). Normalizing difference in inclusive education. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 525-529.
2.
Bailey, A. ( 2000). Locating traitorous identities: Toward a view of privilege-cognizant white character. In U. Narayan & S. Harding (Eds.), Decentering the center: Philosophy for a multicultural, postcolonial, and feminist world (pp. 283-298). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
3.
Bakhtin, M.M. ( 1982). Discourse in the novel (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). In M. Holquist (Ed.), The dialogic imagination: Four essays (pp. 259-422). Austin: University of Texas Press. (Original work published 1935 )
4.
Behar, R., & Gordon, D. A. (Eds.). (1995). Women writing culture . Berkeley, CA; University of California Press.
5.
Bruce, B.C., & Hogan, M.P. ( 1998). The disappearance of technology: Toward an ecological model of literacy. In D. Reinking, M. C. McKenna, L. D. Labbo, & R. D. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformation in a post-typographic world (pp. 269-281). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
6.
Brueggemann, B.J., White, L.F., Dunn, P.A., Heifferon, B.A., & Johnson, C. ( 2001). Becoming visible: Lessons in disability. College Composition and Communication, 52, 368-397.
7.
Butler, J. ( 1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity . New York: Routledge.
8.
Butler-Kisber, L. ( 2007). Collage as inquiry. In J. G. Knowles & A. L. Cole (Eds.), Handbook of the arts in qualitative research: Perspectives, methodologies, examples and issues (pp. 265-276). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
Cahnmann-Taylor, M., & Siegesmund, R. (Eds.). (2007). Arts-based research in education: Foundations for practice. New York: Routledge.
10.
Calkins, L.M. ( 1994). The art of teaching writing. Portsmouth , MA: Heinemann. (Original work published 1986)
11.
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.). (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. New York: Routledge.
12.
Corker, M., & Shakespeare, T. (2002). Mapping the terrain. In M. Corker & T. Shakespeare (Eds.), Disability/postmodernity (pp. 1-17). New York: Continuum.
13.
Delgado, R. ( 1997). Rodrigo’s eleventh chronicle: Empathy and false empathy. In R. Delgado & J. Stefancic (Eds.), Critical white studies: Looking behind the mirror (pp. 614-618). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
14.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. ( 1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
15.
Delpit, L. ( 1995). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York: W.W. Norton .
16.
Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. ( 2000) Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
17.
Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. ( 2005) Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
18.
Feldman, A. ( 2003). Validity and quality in self-study. Educational Researcher, 32(3), 26-28.
19.
Foucault, M. ( 1990). The history of sexuality: Volume I: An introduction (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York: Vintage Books. (Original work published 1978)
20.
Foucault, M. ( 1995). Discipline and punish (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Vintage Books. (Original worked published 1977)
21.
Garland Thomson, R. ( 1997). Extraordinary bodies: Figuring physical disability in American culture and literature. New York: Columbia University Press.
22.
Harding, S. ( 1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
23.
Holbrook, T. ( 1998). Sad water. New York: Bantam Books.
24.
Ignatiev, N. ( 1997). The point is not to interpret whiteness but to abolish it. Retrieved December 6, 2005, from http://racetraitor.org/abolishthepoint.html
25.
Ignatiev, N., & Garvey, J. (Eds.). (1996). Race traitor. New York: Routledge.
26.
Janks, H. ( 2005) Deconstruction and reconstruction: Diversity as a productive resource. Discourse, 26(1), 31-43
27.
Kaufmann, J. ( 2005). Autotheory: An autoethnographic reading of Foucault. Qualitative Inquiry, 11, 576-587.
28.
Kincheloe, J.L. ( 2005). On to the next level: Continuing the conceptualization of the bricolage. Qualitative Inquiry, 11, 323-250.
29.
Kress, G. ( 1999). English at the crossroads: Rethinking curricula of communication in the context of the turn to the visual. In G. E. Hawisher & C. Selfe (Eds.), Passions, pedagogies, and 21st century technologies (pp. 66-88). Logan : Utah State University Press and National Council of Teachers of English.
30.
Landow, G.P. ( 1994). Hyper/Text/Theory. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
31.
Lather, P. ( 2000). Drawing the line at angels: Working the ruins of feminist ethnography. In E. A. St. Pierre & W. S. Pillow (Eds.), Working the ruins: Feminist poststructural theory and methods in education (pp. 284-311). New York: Routledge.
32.
Lévi-Strauss, C. ( 1966). The savage mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33.
Markham, A.N. ( 2005). "Go ugly early": Fragmented narrative and bricolage as interpretive method. Qualitative Inquiry, 11, 813-839.
34.
Nagel, T. ( 1986). The view from nowhere. New York: Oxford University Press.
35.
O’Donnell, J.J. ( 1998). Avatars of the word: From papyrus to cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36.
Oliver, M. ( 1990). The politics of disablement. London : Macmillan Press.
37.
Pullman, G. ( 1999). Stepping yet again into the same current. In T. Kent (Ed.), Post-process theory: Beyond the writing-process paradigm (pp. 16-29). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
38.
Reid, D.K., & Valle, J.W. ( 2004). The discursive practice of learning disability: Implications for instruction and parent-school relations. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 466-481.
39.
Richardson, L. ( 1997). Fields of play (Constructing an academic life). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
40.
Richardson, L. ( 2000). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41.
Richardson, L., & St. Pierre, E.A. (2005). Writing: A method of inquiry . In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed. pp. 959-978). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
Riedelsheimer, T. (Director). (2003). Andy Goldsworthy’s rivers and tides: Working with time [Documentary]. New York: New Video Group
43.
Sartre, J.P. ( 1995). Anti-semite and Jew: An exploration of the etiology of hate. (G. J. Becker, Trans.). New York: Shocken Books. (Original work published in 1948)
44.
Scheurich, J.J. ( 1994). Policy archaeology: A new policy studies methodology . Journal of Education Policy, 9, 297-316.
45.
Segrest, M. ( 1994). Memoir of a race traitor. Boston: South End Press.
46.
Selfe, C.L. ( 2004). Toward new media texts: Taking up the challenges of visual literacy. In A. F. Wysocki, J. Johnson-Eilola, C. l. Selfe, & G. Sirc (Eds.), Writing new media: Theory and applications for expanding the teaching of composition (pp. 67-110). Logan: Utah State University Press.
47.
Snyder, S.L., & Mitchell, D.T. (2006). Cultural locations of disability . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48.
Springgay, S., Irwin, R. L., & Leggo, C. (Eds.). (2007). Being with a/r/tography. Rotterdam , Netherlands: Sense.
49.
St Pierre,. E.A., & Pillow, W.S. ( 2000). Working the ruins: Feminist poststructural theory and methods in education. New York: Routledge.
50.
Ulmer, G. ( 1991, January). Grammatology hypermedia. Postmodern Culture, 1(2).
