This study emerges from a professional development workshop the authors conducted with elementary, middle, and high school teachers. The article highlights of responses of workshop participants, particularly their response that the law was about assimilation, in the context of The General Allotment Act of 1887 and the Hopi Indian response to it. This article investigates that claim by pairing critical dialogist and poststructural analyses. Through the critical dialogist’s tools of microanalysis—meaning fields and reconstructive horizon analyses—the authors uncover possible explicit and implicit assumptions of the General Allotment Act and the Hopi response. The authors then employ a macrolevel poststructural analysis using the analytic frames of governmentality and performativity to interrogate the discursive assumptions underwriting the law and its framers’ failure to acknowledge the polyvocality of American Indian groups. By coupling the critical dialogist and poststructural analytic techniques, the authors produce a comprehensive critique that problematizes the narrative of assimilation and develops new means of historical analysis.
Adams, D.W. ( 1988). Fundamental considerations: the deep meaning of Native American schooling, 1880-1900. Harvard Educational Review , 58(1), 1-28.
2.
Ahern, W. ( 1997). An experiment aborted: Returned Indian students in the Indian School Service, 1881-1908. Ethnohistory, 44, 263-304.
3.
Bannan, H. ( 1978). The idea of civilization and American Indian policy reformers in the 1880s. The Journal of American Culture, 1, 787-799.
4.
Banner, S. ( 2005). How the Indians lost their land: Law and power on the frontier. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
Brendale v. Confederated Tribes. 492 U.S. 408 (1989).
6.
Butler, J. ( 1988). Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre Journal, 40, 519-531.
7.
Butler, J. ( 1997). Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. New York: Routledge.
8.
Cajete, G. ( 1994). Look to the mountain: An ecology of Indigenous education (1sted.). Durango, CO: Kivakí Press.
9.
Carspecken, P.F. ( 1996). Critical ethnography in educational research: A theoretical and practical guide. New York: Routledge.
10.
Carspecken, P.F. ( 1999). Four scenes for posing the question of meaning and other essays in critical philosophy and critical methodology. New York: Peter Lang.
11.
Chused, R.H. ( 1988). Cases, materials, and problems in property. Analysis and Skills Series. New York: M. Bender.
12.
Cohen, F.S. ( 1982). Felix S. Cohen’s handbook of federal Indian law (1982nd ed). Charlottesville, VA: Mitchie.
13.
Cowell, A., & Moss, P. ( 2001). Hinono’einoo3itoono: Arapaho historical traditions, told by Paul Moss. Winnipeg, Manitoba , Canada: University of Manitoba Press.
14.
Deloria, V. ( 1992). God is red: A native view of religion (2nd ed.). Golden, CO: Fulcrum Publishing.
15.
Deloria, V., & Wildcat, D. ( 2001). Power and place: Indian education in America. Golden, CO: Fulcrum Publishing.
16.
Fixico, D.L. ( 2003). The American Indian mind in a linear world: American Indian studies and traditional knowledge. New York: Routledge.
17.
Foucault, M. ( 1970). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences . London: Tavistock.
18.
Foucault, M. ( 1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (1sted.). New York: Pantheon Books.
19.
Foucault, M. ( 1978). The history of sexuality (1sted.). New York: Pantheon Books.
20.
Foucault, M. ( 1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon Books .
21.
Foucault. M. ( 1982). Subject and Power. In H. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (2nd ed., pp. 208-226). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
The General Allotment Act of 1887. 25 U.S.C. 331 (1887).
23.
Gadamer, H. ( 2004). Truth and method. (J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall , Trans.) Continuum impacts (2nd ed.). London: Continuum.
24.
Gould, L.S. ( 1996). The consent paradigm: Tribal sovereignty at the millennium . Columbia Law Review, 96, 810-902.
25.
Grande, S. ( 2008) N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln, & L. T. Smith (Eds.), Red pedagogy: The un-methodology. In Handbook of critical and Indigenous methodologies (pp. 233-254). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Hall, G.E. ( 1988). Land litigation and the idea of New Mexico progress. Journal of the West, 27(3), 48-58.
27.
Hall, S. (Ed.). (1997). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. London: Sage.
28.
Hallward, P. ( 1998). Generic sovereignty and the philosophy of Alain Badiou . Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities, 3(3), 87-111.
29.
Hammersley, M.(2009) Challenging relativism: The problem of assessment criteria. Qualitative Inquiry, 15, 3-29.
30.
Habermas, J. ( 1984). The theory of communicative action: Reason and the socialization of society. (T. McCarthy, Tran.) (Vol. 1). Boston: Beacon Hill.
31.
Habermas, J. ( 1987). The theory of communicative action: Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason. (T. McCarthy, Tran.) (Vol. 2). Boston: Beacon Press.
32.
Homestead Act of 1862. 12 Stat. 392. (1862).
33.
Irvine, S.E., Jones, M.H., & Schellinger, M. (2006). American encounters: Teaching U.S. history from Indian country. San Francisco, CA: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved March 1, 2008, from www.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/oieresearch/conference/irvine_200604.pdf .
34.
Jefferson, T. ( 1955). Notes on the state of Virginia. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.
35.
Johnson v. M’Intosh. 21 U.S. 543 (1823).
36.
Jones, E. ( 2003). The known world. New York: HarperCollins.
37.
Kincheloe, J. ( 2001). Describing the bricolage: Conceptualizing a new rigor in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 7, 679-692.
38.
Korth, B. ( 2002). Critical qualitative research as consciousness raising: The dialogic texts of researcher/researchee interactions. Qualitative Inquiry, 8, 381-403.
39.
Korth, B. ( 2003). A critical reconstruction of care-in-action: a contribution to care theory and research. The Qualitative Report, 8, 487-512.
40.
Ladson-Billings, G. ( 2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in U.S. schools. Educational Researcher, 35, 3-12.
41.
Lawrence, A. ( 2006). Unraveling the white man’s burden: A critical microhistory of federal Indian education policy implementation at Santa Clara Pueblo, 1902-1907 . Indianapolis: Indiana University .
42.
Lear, J. ( 2006). Radical hope: Ethics in the face of cultural devastation . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43.
Lemke, T. ( 2002). Foucault, governmentality, and critique. Rethinking Marxism, 14(3), 49-64.
44.
Lomawaima, K. ( 1996). Estelle Reel, superintendent of Indian schools, 1898-1910: Politics, curriculum, and land. Journal of American Indian Education, 35(3), n.p.
45.
Lomawaima, K. ( 2002) P. Deloria & N. Salisbury (Eds.), American Indian education: by Indians for Indians. In A companion to American Indian history (pp. 422-440). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
46.
Mardock, R.W. ( 1971). The reformers and the American Indian. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.
47.
Mead, G. ( 1934). Meaning. In Mind, self, and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist (pp. 75-82). Chicago: University of Chicago.
48.
Meyer, M.A. ( 2008) N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln, & L. T. Smith (Eds.), Indigenous and authentic. In Handbook of critical and Indigenous methodologies (pp. 217-232). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49.
Miller, L. ( 2008). Foucauldian constructionism. In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 251-274). New York: Guilford.
50.
Nabokov, P. ( 1999). Native American testimony: A chronicle of Indian-white relations from prophecy to the present, 1492-2000. New York: Penguin.
51.
O’Hara, D.T. ( 2007). "The cry of its occasion": On the subject of truth; or the terror in global terrorism. Boundary2, 34, 56-69.
52.
O’Hara, D.T. ( 2008). Badiou’s truth and the office of the critic: Naming the militant multiples of the void. Boundary2, 35, 169-175.
53.
Otis, D. ( 1973). Dawes Act and the allotment of Indian lands. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
54.
Pascale, C. ( 2007). Making sense of race, class, and gender: Commonsense, power, and privilege in the United States. New York: Routledge.
55.
Popkewitz, T. ( 2004). The reason of reason: Cosmopolitanism and the governing of schooling. In B. M. Baker & K. E. Heyning (Eds.), Dangerous coagulations? The uses of Foucault in the study of education (pp. 190-223). New York: Peter Lang.
56.
Prucha, F.P. ( 1973). Americanizing the American Indians: Writings by the "Friends of the Indian," 1880-1900. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
57.
Reyhner, J., & Eder, J. ( 1992). A history of Indian education. In J. Reyhner (Ed.), Teaching American Indian students (pp. 33-58). Norman : University of Oklahoma Press.
58.
Shoemaker, N. ( 2002) N. Shoemaker (Ed.),. Categories. In Clearing a path: Theorizing the past in Native American studies (pp. 51-74). New York: Routledge .
59.
Stam, H. ( 2003). Addressing oneself as another. In C. B. Grant (Ed.), Rethinking communicative interaction new interdisciplinary horizons, pragmatics & beyond (pp. 87-100). Amsterdam : J. Benjamins.
60.
Tosh, J. ( 2002). The pursuit of history: Aims, methods and new directions in the study of modern history. London: Longman.
61.
Tyson, L. ( 2006). Critical theory today: A user-friendly guide. New York: Routledge.
62.
United States v. Wheeler. 435 U.S. 313 (1978).
63.
Warren, D. ( 2005). The wonderful worlds of the education of history. American Educational History Journal, 32(1), 108-115.
64.
Wise, T. ( 2005). White like me: Reflections on race from a privileged son. Brooklyn, NY: Soft Skull Press .
65.
Worcester v. Georgia. 31 U.S. 515 (1832).
66.
Yava, A. ( 1999). We want to tell you something. In P. Nabokov (Ed.), Native American testimony: A chronicle of Indian-white relations from prophecy to the present, 1492-2000 (pp. 246-251). New York: Penguin.
