This article examines the ethical issues bound up in the ways research problems are initially framed: the questions asked, the temporal and spatial frames of the study, the ways participants are defined. It explores the consequences of thinking through ethical issues using recent reconceptualizations of agency and suggests extensions of the ways researchers define participants for ethical purposes. The article concludes by examining some of the reasons for the relative neglect of such issues in graduate research preparation.
Abbott, A. (2006). Process and temporality in sociology: The idea of outcome in U.S. sociology. In G. Steinmetz (Ed.), The politics of method in the human sciences (pp. 393-426). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
2.
Berliner, D. (2006). Our impoverished view of educational reform. Teachers College Record, 108, 949-995.
3.
Bourdieu, P. (1967). Systems of education and systems of thought. International Social Science Journal, 19, 338-358.
4.
Brennis, D. (2004). A partial view of contemporary anthropology. American Anthropologist, 106, 580-588.
5.
Briggs, C. (2005). Communicability, racial discourse, and disease . Annual Review of Anthropology, 34, 269-291.
6.
Callan, E. (2004). Citizenship and education. Annual Review of Political Science, 7, 71-90.
7.
Callon, M., & Law, J. (1995). Agency and the hybrid collectif. South Atlantic Quarterly, 94, 481-507.
8.
Campbell, D.T. (1969). Ethnocentrism of disciplines and the fish scale model of omniscience. In M. Sherif & C. E. Sherif (Eds.), Interdisciplinarity in the social sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
Cannella, G., & Lincoln, Y. (2007). Predatory vs. dialogic ethics: Constructing an illusion or ethical practice as the core of research methods. Qualitative Inquiry, 13, 315-335.
10.
Cassell, J. (1982). Harms, benefits, wrongs, and rights in fieldwork . In J. Sieber (Ed.), The ethics of social research: Fieldwork, regulation, and publication (pp. 7-31). New York: Springer-Verlag.
11.
Cheek, J. (2000). An untold story? Doing funded qualitative research . In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 401-420). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
Clifford, J. (1992). Traveling cultures. In L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, & P. Treichler (Eds.), Cultural studies (pp. 96-117). New York: Routledge.
13.
Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (2001). Participation: The new tyranny?London: Zed Books.
14.
Cooper, R. (1998). Assemblage notes. In R. Chia (Ed.), Organized worlds: Explorations in technology and organization with Robert Cooper (pp. 108-120). London: Routledge.
15.
Denich, B. (1980). Bureaucratic scholarship: The new anthropology . In G. Britan & R. Cohen (Eds.), Hierarchy and society (pp. 165-175). Philadelphia, PA: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.
16.
Dewey, J., & Bentley, A. (1949). Knowing and the known. Boston : Beacon Press.
17.
Deyhle, D., Hess, G.A., & LeCompte, M. (1992). Approaching ethical issues for qualitative researchers in education. In M. M. LeCompte, M. Millroy, & J. Preissle (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 597-641). New York: Academic Press.
18.
Dougherty, D., & Atkinson, J. (2006). Competing ethical communities and a researcher's dilemma: The case of a sexual harasser. Qualitative Inquiry , 12, 292-315.
19.
Eisenhart, M., & DeHaan, R. (2005). Doctoral preparation of scientifically based education researchers. Educational Researcher , 34(4), 3-13.
20.
Emanuel, E., & Weijer, C. (2005). Protecting communities in research: From a new principle to relational protections. In J. Childress, E. Meslin, & H. Shapiro (Eds.), Belmont revisited (pp. 165-183). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
21.
Erickson, F. (2004). Demystifying data construction and analysis. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 35, 486-493.
22.
Fals-Borda, O. (2000). Peoples' SpaceTimes in global processes: The response of the local. Journal of World-Systems Research, 6, 624-634.
23.
Fals-Borda, O., & Rahman, A. (1991). Action and knowledge: Breaking the monopoly with PAR. New York: Apex Press/ Intermediate Technology Publications.
24.
Farmer, P. (2003). Pathologies of power. Berkeley : University of California Press.
25.
Fine, M. (1995). Working the hyphens: Reinventing self and other in qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 70-82). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Fuchs, S. (2001). Beyond agency. Sociological Theory , 19, 24-40.
27.
Gaventa, J., & Cornwall, A. (2001). Power and knowledge. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (pp. 70-80). London: Sage.
28.
Golde, C. M., & Walker, G. E. (Eds.). (2006). Envisioning the future of doctoral education: Preparing stewards of the discipline. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
29.
Harvey, D. (1996). Justice, nature and the geography of difference . Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
30.
Hitlin, S., & Elder, G. (2007). Time, self, and the curiously abstract concept of agency. Sociological Theory, 25, 170-191.
31.
Kalb, D. (2005). "Bare legs like ice": Recasting class for local/global inquiry. In D. Kalb & H. Tak (Eds.), Critical junctions: Anthropology and history beyond the cultural turn (pp. 109-136). New York: Berghahn Books.
32.
Klinenberg, E. (2002). Heat wave: A social autopsy of disaster in Chicago . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33.
Labaree, D. (2003). The peculiar problem of preparing educational researchers. Educational Researcher, 32(4), 13-22.
34.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social. Oxford , UK: Oxford University Press.
35.
LeCompte, M. (1995). Some notes on power, agenda, and voice: A researcher's personal evolution towards critical collaborative research. In P. McLaren & J. Giarelli (Eds.), Critical theory and educational research (pp. 91-112). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
36.
LeCompte, M., & Schensul, J. (1999). Designing and conducting ethnographic research . Walnut Creek, CA: Sage.
37.
Lederman, R. (2006). Introduction: Anxious borders between work and life in a time of bureaucratic ethics regulation. American Ethnologist, 33, 477-481.
38.
MacPherson, C. (1962). The political theory of possessive individualism . Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
39.
Maguire, P. (1993). Challenges, contradictions, and celebrations: Attempting participatory research as a doctoral student. In P. Park, M. Brydon-Miller , B. Hall, & T. Jackson (Eds.), Voices of change: Participatory research in the United States and Canada (pp. 157-176). Westport, CT : Bergin & Garvey.
40.
Makkar, B. (2002). Roles and responsibilities in researching poor women in Brazil. In T. Welland & L. Pugsley (Eds.), Ethical dilemmas in qualitative research (pp. 75-93). Burlington, VT : Ashgate.
41.
Massey, D. (1993). Power-geometry and a progressive sense of place . In J. Bird, B. Curtis, T. Putnam, G. Robertson, & L. Tickner (Eds.), Mapping the futures (pp. 59-69). London : Routledge.
42.
Massey, D. (2002). Globalisation: What does it mean for geography? Keynote lecture at the Geographical Association Annual Conference, UMIST. Available from www.geograpphy.org.uk
43.
Metz, M. (2001). Intellectual border cross in graduate education: A report from the field. Educational Researcher, 30(5), 12-18.
44.
Morse, J. (2004). Preparing and evaluating qualitative research proposals. In C. Seal, G. Gobo, J. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 493-503). London: Sage.
45.
Myers, G. (1990). In Writing biology: Texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.
46.
Nader, L. (1972). Up the anthropologist-Perspectives gained from studying up. In D. Hymes (Ed.), Reinventing anthropology (pp. 284-311). New York: Vintage.
47.
Nader, L. (1976). Professional standards and what we study. In M. Rynkiewich & J. Spradley (Eds.), Ethics and anthropology: Dilemmas in fieldworkMadison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.
48.
Nygreen, K. (2006). Reproducing or challenging power in the questions we ask and the methods we use: A framework for activist research in urban education. Urban Review, 38, 1-26.
49.
Page, R. (2001). Reshaping graduate preparation in educational research methods: One school's experience. Educational Researcher , 30(5), 19-25.
50.
Pallas, A. (2001). Preparing education doctoral students for epistemological diversity. Educational Researcher, 30(5), 6-11.
51.
Poovey, M. (1995). Making a social body: British cultural formation, 1830-1864. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
52.
Priyadharshini, E. (2003). Coming unstuck: Thinking otherwise about "studying up." Anthropology & Education Review, 34, 420-437.
53.
Ragin, C. (1992). "Casing" and the process of social inquiry. In C. Ragin & H. Becker (Eds.), What is a case? (pp. 217-226). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
54.
Restrepo, E., & Escobar, A. (2005). "Other anthropologies and anthropology otherwise": Steps to a World Anthropologies Framework. Critique of Anthropology , 25, 99-129.
55.
Rose, N., O'Malley, P., & Valverde, M. (2006). Governmentality. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2, 83-104.
56.
Roth, W-M. (2005). Ethics as social practice: Introducing the debate on qualitative research and ethics. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(1), Art 9. Online journal. http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/1-05/05-1-9-e.htm . Accessed 5/2/05.
57.
Shavelson, R., & Towne, L. (Eds.). (2002). Scientific research in education . Washington, DC: National Research Council, National Academy Press.
58.
Sherwin, S. (2005). Belmont revisited through a feminist lens. In J. Childress, E. Meslin, & H. Shapiro (Eds.), Belmont revisited (pp. 148-164). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
59.
Sipe, L., & Ghiso, M. (2004). Developing conceptual categories in classroom descriptive research: Some problems and possibilities. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 35, 472-485.
60.
Sjoberg, G., & Nett, R. (1968). A methodology for social research. New York: Harper & Row.
61.
Smith, D. (1987). The everyday world as problematic. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Smith, N. (2005). Neo-critical geography, or, the flat pluralist world of business class. Antipode, 37, 887-899.
64.
Stoecker, R. (2005). Research methods for community change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
65.
Strathern, M. (1996) Cutting the network. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 2, 517-535.
66.
Strathern, M. (2006). Don't eat unwashed lettuce. American Ethnologist, 33, 532-534.
67.
Strike, K.A., Anderson, M., Curren, R., Van Geel, T., Pritchard, I., & Robertson, E. (2002). Ethical standards of the American Educational Research Association: Cases and commentary. Washington, DC: AERA.
68.
Tardy, C. (2003). A genre system view of the funding of academic research. Written Communication, 20(1), 7-36.
69.
Thorne, B. (1980). "You still takin' notes?": Fieldwork and problems of informed consent. Social Problems, 27(3): 284-297.
70.
Wertsch, J., Tulviste, P., & Hagstrom, F. (1993). A sociocultural approach to agency. In E. Forman, N. Minick, & C. A. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children's development (pp. 336-356). New York: Oxford University Press.
71.
Young, I.M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
