This article draws on Lacanian theories of subjectivity to examine notions of the self in autoethnography. The authors discuss philosophical differences between Humanist and post-Humanist notions of the self and show how these notions are correlated to particular self-study genres, such as confession and testimony. The authors argue that autoethnographic narratives exhibit contradictory tendencies toward both Humanist and post-Humanist conceptions of subjectivity. Questionnaire responses from four participants are analyzed for evidence of this contradiction. The article concludes by suggesting that resolving the contradiction is neither possible nor desirable.
Anderson, L. (2001). Autobiography. New York: Routledge.
2.
Barone, T.E., & Blumenfeld-Jones, D.S. (1997). Interrupting the sign: The aesthetics of research texts. In J. A. Jipson & N. Paley (Eds.), Daredevil research: Re-creating analytic practice (pp. 83-107). New York: Peter Lang.
3.
Barthes, R. (1977). Roland Barthes by Roland Barthes (R. Howard, Trans.) . London: Macmillan. (Original work published 1975)
4.
Brown, T., & England, J. (2004). Revisiting emancipatory teacher research: A psychoanalytic perspective. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25, 67-79.
5.
Burman, E. (2003). Narratives of "experience" and pedagogical practices . Narrative Inquiry, 13, 269-286.
6.
Caputo, J.D., & Scanlon, M.J. (2005). Augustine and postmodernism: Confessions and Circumfession . Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
7.
Clough, P. (2002). Narratives and fictions in educational research . Philadelphia: Open University Press.
8.
Cole, A., & Knowles, G. (2001). Lives in context: The art of life history research . Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press .
9.
Cole, A., Knowles, G. , & Neilsen, L. (Eds.). (2001). The art of writing inquiry. Halifax, NS: Backalong Books.
10.
Cole, A., & McIntyre, M. (2004). Research as aesthetic contemplation: The role of the audience in research representation. Educational Insights , 9. Retrieved December 15, 2005 , from http://www.ccfi.educ.ubc.ca/publication/insights/v09n01/articles/cole.html
11.
Davies, B., Browne, J., Gannon, S., Honan, E., Laws, C., Müller-Rockstroh, B., et al. (2004). The ambivalent practices of reflexivity . Qualitative Inquiry, 10, 360-389.
12.
Davies, B., Dormer, S., Gannon, S., Laws, C., Taguchi, H.L., McCann, H., et al. (2001). Becoming schoolgirls: The ambivalent project of subjectification. Gender and Education, 13, 167-182.
13.
Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (2000). The seventh moment: Out of the past. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 1047-1965). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (2003). The seventh moment of qualitative research: Theories and issues. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
Derrida, J. (1988). The ear of the other: Otobiography, transference, translation: texts and discussions with Jacques Derrida. (C. Mcdonald, Ed.; P. Kamuff & A. Ronell, Trans.). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. (Original work published 1982)
16.
de Man, P. (1979). Autobiography as de-facement. Modern Language Notes, 94, 919-930.
17.
Ellis, C. (2004). The ethnographic I: A methodological novel about autoethnography. Lanham, MD: Altamira Press.
18.
Ellis, C. (2007). Autoethnography: A panel discussion. Paper presented at the third annual Qualitative Inquiry Congress , Urbana-Champagne, IL.
19.
Ellis, C., & Bochner, A.P. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 733-768). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
Felman, S. (1993). What does a woman want? Reading and sexual difference . Baltimore, WT: Johns Hopkins University Press.
21.
Forster, A. (2002). Facing. Atlanta, GA: Nexus Press .
22.
Freeman, M. (2003). Identity and difference. Narrative Inquiry, 13, 331-346.
23.
Grosz, E. (1990). Jacques Lacan: A feminist introduction. New York: Routledge.
24.
Lacan, J. (2002). Ecrits: A selection (B. Fink, Trans.). New York: Norton. (Original work published 1966)
25.
Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge.
26.
Leggo, C. (2004). Tangled lines: On autobiography and poetic knowing . In A. L. Cole, L. Neilsen, J. G. Knowles , & T. C. Luciani (Eds.), Provoked by art: Theorizing arts-informed research (pp. 18-35). Halifax, NS: Backalong Books & The Centre for Arts-informed Research.
27.
Maclure, M. (2003). Discourse in educational and social research. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
28.
Peters, M., & Burbules, N. (2004). Poststructuralism and educational research. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
29.
Rapaport, H. (2003). Later Derrida: Reading the recent work. New York: Routledge-Falmer.
30.
Richardson, L. (2000). Writing. In N. K. Denzin &Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 1047-1065). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
St. Pierre, E. (1997). Circling the text: Nomadic writing practices. Qualitative Inquiry, 12, 403-417.
32.
St. Pierre, E. (2000). Working the ruins: Feminist poststructural theory and methods ineducation. New York: Routledge.
33.
Stronach, I., Garratt, D., Pearce, C., & Piper, H. (2007). Reflexivity, the picturing of selves, the forging of method. Qualitative Inquiry, 13, 179-203.
34.
Tarc, A.M. (2005). Education as humanism of the other. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 37, 833-849.
