This article offers an account of how a researcher's subjectivity might be seen as being stitched into the fabric of practitioner research. It uses Lacan's notion of the mirror phase in suggesting that the subject of reflection is not quite what he or she might seem to be. The Freudian concept of desire is considered in relation to the motivations that reflective research models produce. This is contrasted with his concept of drive read against a research attitude where excessive belief in the linguistic forms of such research risks usurping the life one might seek to locate. The article draws on a contemporary reading of the terms as offered by the Lacanian social commentator Slavoj Žižek. Two examples are provided of teachers carrying out practitioner research for higher degrees. These document the awkwardness the teachers experience in building conceptions of self through reflective work as personal ideas are processed in social space.
Althusser, L. (1971). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. London: New Left Books.
2.
Appel, S. (1996). Positioning subjects: Psychoanalysis and critical educational studies. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
3.
Atkinson, D. (2002). Art in education: Identity and practice. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
4.
Atkinson, D. (2004). Theorising how student teachers form their identities in Initial Teacher Education. British Education Research Journal , 30(3), 379-394.
5.
Bottery, M., & Wright, N. (1996). Cooperating in their own deprofessionalisation? On the need to recognise the "public" and "ecological" roles of the teaching profession. British Journal of Education Studies, 44(1), 82-98.
6.
Britzman, D. (1998). Lost subjects, contested objects. Albany: State University of New York Press.
7.
Britzman, D. (2003). After education. Albany: State University of New York Press.
8.
Brown, T., Atkinson, D., & England, J. (2006). Regulative discourses in education: A Lacanian perspective. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
9.
Brown, T., Devine, N., Leslie, E., Paiti, M., Silailai, E., Umaki, S., et al. (2007). Reflective engagement in cultural history: A Lacanian perspective on Pasifika teachers in New Zealand. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 15(1), 107-119.
10.
Brown, T., & England, J. (2004). Revisiting emancipatory teacher research: A psychoanalytic perspective. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25(1), 67-80.
11.
Brown, T., & England, J. (2005). Identity, narrative and practitioner research . Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education , 26(4), 443-458.
12.
Brown, T., Hardy, T., & Wilson, D. (1993). Mathematics on Lacans couch. For the Learning of Mathematics, 13(1), 11-14.
13.
Brown, T., & Jones, L. (2001). Action research and postmodernism: Congruence and critique. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
14.
Brown, T., & McNamara, O. (2005). New teacher identity and regulative government: The discursive formation of primary mathematics teacher education. New York: Springer.
15.
Brown, T., & Roberts, L. (2000). Memories are made of this: Temporality and practitioner research. British Educational Research Journal, 26(5), 649-659.
16.
Butler, J. (1997). The psychic life of power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
17.
Butler, R. (2005). Slavoj iek: Live theory. London : Continuum.
18.
Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Knowing through action research . London: Falmer.
19.
Elliott, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
20.
England, J., & Brown, T. (2001). Inclusion, exclusion and marginalization. Educational Action Research, 9(3), 335-371.
21.
Evans, D. (1997). Dictionary of Lacanian psychoanalysis. London: Routledge.
22.
Felman, S. (1987). Jacques Lacan and the adventure of insight: Psychoanalysis in contemporary culture. Cambridge, MA: University of Harvard Press.
23.
Foucault, M. (1991). The Foucault reader. Harmondsworth , UK: Peregrine.
24.
Foucault, M. (1997). The ethics of the concern of the self as a practice of freedom. In P. Rabinow (Trans.), Ethics (pp. 281-301). London: Penguin.
25.
Freud, S. (2002). Civilisation and its discontents. London: Penguin.
26.
Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and the last man. London: Penguin.
27.
Gallagher, S. (1992). Hermeneutics and education. Albany: State University of New York Press.
28.
Habermas, J. (1976). Systematically distorted communication. In P. Connerton (Ed.), Critical sociology (pp. 348-361). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
29.
Henriques, J., Hollway, W., Urwin, C., Venn, C., & Walkerdine, V. (1984). Changing the subject. London: Methuen.
30.
Homer, S. (2005). Jacques Lacan. London: Routledge.
31.
Jagodzinski, J. (2001). Pedagogical desire. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
32.
Lacan, J. (1990). Television. New York: Norton.
33.
Lacan, J. (2002). The seminar of Jacques Lacan. Book IX. Identification (C. Gallagher, Trans.). Privately produced by translator.
34.
Lacan, J. (2006). Ecrits. New York: Norton.
35.
Laclau, W., & Mouffe, C. (2001). Hegemony and socialist strategy. London: Verso.
36.
Office for Standards in Education. (2000). Handbook for inspection. London: Author.
37.
Pitt, A. (1998). Qualifying resistance: Some comments on methodological dilemmas. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 11(4), 535-554.
38.
Pitt, A., & Britzman, D. (2003). Speculations on qualities of difficult knowledge in teaching and learning: An experiment in psychoanalytic research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(6), 755-776.
39.
Ricoeur, P. (1981). Hermeneutics and the human sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
40.
Todd, S. (Ed.). (1997). Learning desire. New York: Routledge .
41.
Žižek, S. ( 1989). The sublime object of ideology. London : Verso.
42.
Žižek, S. ( 1996). The indivisible remainder. An essay on Schelling and related matters. London: Verso.
43.
Žižek, S. (1997). The plague of fantasies. London: Verso.
44.
Žižek, S. ( 2005, May). Respect for otherness? No thanks. Lecture at Birkbeck College, London.
45.
Žižek, S. ( 2006). The parallax view. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
